Suppr超能文献

同行评审要点:评审稿件以用于…… (原文此处不完整)

Peer-Review Essentials: Reviewing Manuscripts for the .

作者信息

Jung Eric, Rachitskaya Aleksandra, Yonekawa Yoshihiro, Murray Timothy G

机构信息

Cleveland Clinic, Cole Eye Institute, Cleveland, CA, USA.

Wills Eye Hospital, Mid Atlantic Retina, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA.

出版信息

J Vitreoretin Dis. 2025 Apr 15:24741264251331647. doi: 10.1177/24741264251331647.

Abstract

The thoughtful process of peer review allows for the vetting and improvement of scientific work that leads to quality research and, eventually, advancement of the field of retina. Progress in medicine would not occur without dedicated researchers, but just as important are the peer reviewers who take the time assess their work, weigh in on their validity, and help bring these papers to life. Here, we discuss how to effectively review a journal manuscript in a way that helps both the beginning reviewer and the seasoned expert develop a framework to provide meaningful peer review. Although this guide was specifically written with aims in mind, these suggestions can be broadly applied to the process of manuscript review in general.

摘要

同行评审的深思熟虑过程有助于对科学工作进行审查和改进,从而产生高质量的研究成果,并最终推动视网膜领域的发展。没有敬业的研究人员,医学就不会进步,但同样重要的是同行评审人员,他们花时间评估研究工作,权衡其有效性,并帮助这些论文得以发表。在此,我们讨论如何有效地评审期刊稿件,以帮助新手评审人员和经验丰富的专家都能建立一个框架,提供有意义的同行评审。虽然本指南是专门针对特定目标编写的,但这些建议一般可广泛应用于稿件评审过程。

相似文献

1
Peer-Review Essentials: Reviewing Manuscripts for the .
J Vitreoretin Dis. 2025 Apr 15:24741264251331647. doi: 10.1177/24741264251331647.
2
Reviewer training for improving grant and journal peer review.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Nov 28;11(11):MR000056. doi: 10.1002/14651858.MR000056.pub2.
3
The effect of peer review on the improvement of rejected manuscripts.
Account Res. 2021 Nov;28(8):517-527. doi: 10.1080/08989621.2020.1869547. Epub 2021 Jan 8.
4
A primer: peer review process for .
Adv Physiol Educ. 2024 Dec 1;48(4):932-935. doi: 10.1152/advan.00127.2024. Epub 2024 Sep 5.
5
Statistical reviewers improve reporting in biomedical articles: a randomized trial.
PLoS One. 2007 Mar 28;2(3):e332. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0000332.
7
Reviewing manuscripts for peer-review journals: a primer for novice and seasoned reviewers.
Ann Behav Med. 2011 Aug;42(1):1-13. doi: 10.1007/s12160-011-9269-x.
8
How to be a good reviewer: A step-by-step guide for approaching peer review of a scientific manuscript.
Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol. 2024 Jun 4;9(3):e1266. doi: 10.1002/lio2.1266. eCollection 2024 Jun.
10
Student peer review decisions on submitted manuscripts are as stringent as faculty peer reviewers.
Adv Physiol Educ. 2010 Dec;34(4):170-3. doi: 10.1152/advan.00046.2010.

本文引用的文献

1
Characteristics of Design and Analysis of Ophthalmic Randomized Controlled Trials: A Review of Ophthalmic Papers 2020-2021.
Ophthalmol Sci. 2022 Dec 31;3(2):100266. doi: 10.1016/j.xops.2022.100266. eCollection 2023 Jun.
2
Guidelines for Reporting Outcomes in Trial Reports: The CONSORT-Outcomes 2022 Extension.
JAMA. 2022 Dec 13;328(22):2252-2264. doi: 10.1001/jama.2022.21022.
3
Selection of appropriate statistical methods for data analysis.
Ann Card Anaesth. 2019 Jul-Sep;22(3):297-301. doi: 10.4103/aca.ACA_248_18.
4
Eyes or subjects: are ophthalmic randomized controlled trials properly designed and analyzed?
Ophthalmology. 2012 Apr;119(4):869-72. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2011.09.025. Epub 2012 Jan 9.
5
How to review journal manuscripts.
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2010 Apr;142(4):472-86. doi: 10.1016/j.otohns.2010.02.010.
6
Study designs in epidemiology and levels of evidence.
Am J Ophthalmol. 2010 Mar;149(3):367-70. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2009.08.001.
7
Uniform format for disclosure of competing interests in ICMJE journals.
JAMA. 2010 Jan 6;303(1):75-6. doi: 10.1001/jama.2009.1542. Epub 2009 Oct 13.
8
Research status of case reports for medical school institutional review boards.
JAMA. 2007 Sep 19;298(11):1277-8. doi: 10.1001/jama.298.11.1277.
9
Safe and effective.
Ophthalmology. 2003 Nov;110(11):2073-4. doi: 10.1016/S0161-6420(03)01004-2.
10
What constitutes a great review?
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2003 Oct 1;42(7):1314-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2003.08.020.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验