Jung Eric, Rachitskaya Aleksandra, Yonekawa Yoshihiro, Murray Timothy G
Cleveland Clinic, Cole Eye Institute, Cleveland, CA, USA.
Wills Eye Hospital, Mid Atlantic Retina, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
J Vitreoretin Dis. 2025 Apr 15:24741264251331647. doi: 10.1177/24741264251331647.
The thoughtful process of peer review allows for the vetting and improvement of scientific work that leads to quality research and, eventually, advancement of the field of retina. Progress in medicine would not occur without dedicated researchers, but just as important are the peer reviewers who take the time assess their work, weigh in on their validity, and help bring these papers to life. Here, we discuss how to effectively review a journal manuscript in a way that helps both the beginning reviewer and the seasoned expert develop a framework to provide meaningful peer review. Although this guide was specifically written with aims in mind, these suggestions can be broadly applied to the process of manuscript review in general.
同行评审的深思熟虑过程有助于对科学工作进行审查和改进,从而产生高质量的研究成果,并最终推动视网膜领域的发展。没有敬业的研究人员,医学就不会进步,但同样重要的是同行评审人员,他们花时间评估研究工作,权衡其有效性,并帮助这些论文得以发表。在此,我们讨论如何有效地评审期刊稿件,以帮助新手评审人员和经验丰富的专家都能建立一个框架,提供有意义的同行评审。虽然本指南是专门针对特定目标编写的,但这些建议一般可广泛应用于稿件评审过程。