Zhang Zhou, Xiong Weizhi, Liu Heng
BAYI Orthopedic Hospital, China RongTong Medical Healthcare Group Co. Ltd., Chengdu, China.
School of Physical Education, Chengdu Sport University, Chengdu, China.
Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2025 Apr 3;13:1525000. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2025.1525000. eCollection 2025.
This study aimed to investigate the effects of combined elastic band resistance training (EBRT) and whole-body vibration training (WBVT) on lower limb isokinetic muscle strength, balance and physical performance in older women with history of falls.
A total of 102 older women with a history of falls was randomly assigned to the elastic band group ( = 28), vibration group ( = 28), elastic band plus vibration group ( = 28) and control group ( = 28) for a 12-week program. All groups performed identical exercises (half squats, static squats, left/right lunges) thrice weekly. The control group trained on a flat ground without elastic bands or vibration; the elastic band group used elastic bands on the flat ground, while the vibration and combined groups exercised on a vibration platform. Training parameters included 3 sets × 10 repetitions with 20-s rest intervals.
Post-intervention, knee flexion peak torque increased by 9.7% ( < 0.05). Total length (TL), elliptical area (EA), total offset index (TAI), timed up and go test (TUG) and five times sit-to-stand test (FTSST) decreased by 16.2%, 14.2%, 21.9%, 16.9% and 14.0%, respectively; and modified fall efficacy scale (MFES) increased by 17.6% ( < 0.01) in the elastic band group. Knee extension peak torque increased by 16.3% ( < 0.05). TL, EA, TAI, TUG and FTSST decreased by 14.8%, 12.2%, 18.9%, 12.3% and 11.5%, respectively; and MFES increased by 16.2% in the vibration group ( < 0.01). Hip and knee flexion and knee and ankle extension peak torque increased by 19.5%, 18.8%, 30.2% and 30.1% ( < 0.01), respectively, in the elastic band plus vibration group. TAI, TL, EA, TUG and FTSST decreased by 28.5%, 24.6%, 38.3%, 22.4% and 29.0%, respectively, and MFES increased by 42.1% in the elastic band plus vibration group ( < 0.01). The elastic band plus vibration group demonstrated greater improvements in knee and ankle strength compared to single interventions, while the elastic band and vibration groups showed smaller changes ( < 0.05). Additionally TL, EA, TAI, TUG, and FTSST all decreased, while MFES increased ( < 0.05).
The combined EBRT and WBVT can enhance knee and ankle isokinetic muscle strength, improve balance ability and physical performance and reduce fear of falls by a greater degree than single interventions. EBRT and WBVT had limited effects on improving lower limb isokinetic muscle strength but enhanced balance ability, physical performance, and reduced fear of falls in older women with a history of falls. Both training modalities showed similar effects.
本研究旨在探讨弹力带抗阻训练(EBRT)与全身振动训练(WBVT)相结合对有跌倒史老年女性下肢等速肌力、平衡能力及身体功能的影响。
将102名有跌倒史的老年女性随机分为弹力带组(n = 28)、振动组(n = 28)、弹力带加振动组(n = 28)和对照组(n = 28),进行为期12周的训练。所有组每周进行三次相同的运动(半蹲、静蹲、左右弓步蹲)。对照组在平地上训练,不使用弹力带或振动;弹力带组在平地上使用弹力带,而振动组和联合组在振动平台上进行运动。训练参数包括3组×10次重复,每次间歇20秒。
干预后,弹力带组膝关节屈曲峰值扭矩增加了9.7%(P < 0.05)。总长度(TL)、椭圆面积(EA)、总偏移指数(TAI)、计时起立行走测试(TUG)和五次坐立测试(FTSST)分别下降了16.2%、14.2%、21.9%、16.9%和14.0%;改良跌倒效能量表(MFES)增加了17.6%(P < 0.01)。振动组膝关节伸展峰值扭矩增加了16.3%(P < 0.05)。TL、EA、TAI、TUG和FTSST分别下降了14.8%、12.2%、18.9%、12.3%和11.5%;MFES增加了16.2%(P < 0.01)。弹力带加振动组髋关节和膝关节屈曲以及膝关节和踝关节伸展峰值扭矩分别增加了19.5%、18.8%、30.2%和30.1%(P < 0.01)。弹力带加振动组TAI、TL、EA、TUG和FTSST分别下降了28.5%、24.6%、38.3%、22.4%和29.0%,MFES增加了42.1%(P < 0.01)。与单一干预相比,弹力带加振动组在膝关节和踝关节力量方面有更大改善,而弹力带组和振动组变化较小(P < 0.05)。此外,TL、EA、TAI、TUG和FTSST均下降,而MFES增加(P < 0.05)。
EBRT与WBVT相结合比单一干预能更大程度地增强膝关节和踝关节等速肌力,改善平衡能力和身体功能,并降低跌倒恐惧。EBRT和WBVT对提高有跌倒史老年女性下肢等速肌力作用有限,但能增强平衡能力、身体功能并降低跌倒恐惧。两种训练方式效果相似。