• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

单孔脐部腹腔镜子宫切除术与经阴道自然腔道内镜手术的比较结果

Comparative outcomes of hysterectomy using single-port umbilical laparoscopy versus vaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery.

作者信息

Güngördük Kemal, Şahin Uyar Berican, Gülseren Varol

机构信息

Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Muğla Sıtkı Koçman University, Muğla, Turkey.

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Muğla Sıtkı Koçman University, Muğla, Turkey.

出版信息

Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol. 2025 Aug;34(4):318-323. doi: 10.1080/13645706.2025.2490080. Epub 2025 Apr 18.

DOI:10.1080/13645706.2025.2490080
PMID:40249605
Abstract

BACKGROUND

This study compared two minimally invasive hysterectomy techniques-single-port umbilical laparoscopy (SPLS) and vaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (vNOTES)-in terms of operating time, blood loss, postoperative pain, and hospitalization duration.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed patients who underwent hysterectomy SPLS or vNOTES. Inclusion criteria were patients who had a hysterectomy with bilateral salpingectomy, with additional procedures such as salpingo-oophorectomy or sentinel lymph node dissection as indicated.

RESULTS

Among the 121 patients studied, 63 underwent SPLS and 58 underwent vNOTES. The mean operative time was 67.3 ± 15.9 min for vNOTES and 75.7 ± 12.1 min for SPLS. Six patients (9.5%) in the SPLS group and four (6.9%) in the vNOTES group underwent sentinel lymph node biopsies for endometrial cancer. Pain assessment at six, 12, and 24 h after surgery indicated lower visual analog scale (VAS) scores in the vNOTES group. Notably, patients in that group reported reduced shoulder and umbilical pain at 24 h postoperatively. Those patients also showed improved sexual function index scores and reduced dyspareunia, although the differences were not statistically significant.

CONCLUSIONS

The vNOTES approach to hysterectomy is a viable alternative, characterized by shorter operative times and decreased postoperative pain without increasing complication rates.

摘要

背景

本研究比较了两种微创子宫切除术技术——单孔脐部腹腔镜手术(SPLS)和经阴道自然腔道内镜手术(vNOTES)在手术时间、失血量、术后疼痛及住院时间方面的差异。

方法

我们回顾性分析了接受SPLS或vNOTES子宫切除术的患者。纳入标准为接受子宫切除术并双侧输卵管切除术的患者,必要时可进行输卵管卵巢切除术或前哨淋巴结清扫等额外手术。

结果

在121例研究患者中,63例行SPLS,58例行vNOTES。vNOTES组的平均手术时间为67.3±15.9分钟,SPLS组为75.7±12.1分钟。SPLS组有6例(9.5%)患者和vNOTES组有4例(6.9%)患者因子宫内膜癌接受了前哨淋巴结活检。术后6、12和24小时的疼痛评估显示,vNOTES组的视觉模拟评分(VAS)较低。值得注意的是,该组患者术后24小时肩部和脐部疼痛减轻。这些患者的性功能指数评分也有所改善,性交困难减少,尽管差异无统计学意义。

结论

vNOTES子宫切除术是一种可行的替代方法,其特点是手术时间较短,术后疼痛减轻,且不增加并发症发生率。

相似文献

1
Comparative outcomes of hysterectomy using single-port umbilical laparoscopy versus vaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery.单孔脐部腹腔镜子宫切除术与经阴道自然腔道内镜手术的比较结果
Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol. 2025 Aug;34(4):318-323. doi: 10.1080/13645706.2025.2490080. Epub 2025 Apr 18.
2
Can vaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery hysterectomy be performed in patients with an enlarged uterus?子宫增大的患者可以进行经阴道自然腔道内镜手术子宫切除术吗?
J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2025 Jun;51(6):e16345. doi: 10.1111/jog.16345.
3
Robotic single port versus robotic multiple port transvaginal orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery hysterectomy: a comparison of surgical outcomes.机器人单孔与机器人多孔经阴道自然腔道内镜手术子宫切除术:手术结果比较
J Robot Surg. 2025 Jul 21;19(1):410. doi: 10.1007/s11701-025-02593-x.
4
Vaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery for gender affirmation.用于性别确认的经阴道自然腔道内镜手术。
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2025 Jul 13. doi: 10.1002/ijgo.70342.
5
The feasibility and surgical outcomes of robotic vaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic single port hysterectomy for benign gynecologic diseases: a systematic review and meta-analysis.机器人经阴道自然腔道内镜单孔子宫切除术治疗良性妇科疾病的可行性及手术效果:一项系统评价与Meta分析
AJOG Glob Rep. 2025 May 14;5(3):100512. doi: 10.1016/j.xagr.2025.100512. eCollection 2025 Aug.
6
Clinical application of vaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery in hysterectomy.经阴道自然腔道内镜手术在子宫切除术中的临床应用
Afr J Reprod Health. 2025 Jun 26;29(6):49-57. doi: 10.29063/ajrh2025/v29i6.5.
7
Is single-port laparoscopy or vaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery the better option for salpingo-oophorectomy?经阴道自然腔道内镜手术与单孔腹腔镜手术用于输卵管卵巢切除术,哪一种更好?
J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2024 Nov;50(11):2147-2152. doi: 10.1111/jog.16112. Epub 2024 Oct 1.
8
vNOTES hysterectomy versus laparoscopic hysterectomy: experiences and outcomes in a tertiary center.经阴道自然腔道内镜手术子宫切除术与腹腔镜子宫切除术:三级中心的经验与结果
Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol. 2025 Aug;34(4):297-302. doi: 10.1080/13645706.2025.2500097. Epub 2025 May 4.
9
Perioperative outcomes of transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery and transumbilical laparoendoscopic single-site surgery in hysterectomy: A comparative study.经阴道自然腔道内镜手术与经脐腹腔镜单部位手术治疗子宫切除术的围手术期结局比较:一项对照研究。
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2024 Jun;165(3):1151-1157. doi: 10.1002/ijgo.15323. Epub 2023 Dec 22.
10
Early experience with the gasless vNOTES technique for adnexal surgery.无气单孔腹腔镜附件手术的早期经验。
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2025 Jun;169(3):1232-1238. doi: 10.1002/ijgo.16136. Epub 2025 Feb 14.

引用本文的文献

1
TUSILS-SRA: A Modified Way of Costal Cartilage Harvest for Rhinoplasty.TUSILS-SRA:一种用于隆鼻术的改良肋软骨获取方法。
Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2025 Aug 11. doi: 10.1007/s00266-025-05009-1.