Cheng Adam, Calhoun Aaron, Reedy Gabriel
Departments of Pediatrics and Emergency Medicine, Alberta Children's Hospital, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, 28 Oki Drive NW, Calgary, Alberta, T3B 6A8, Canada.
University of Louisville School of Medicine and Norton Children's Medical Group, Louisville, KY, USA.
Adv Simul (Lond). 2025 Apr 18;10(1):22. doi: 10.1186/s41077-025-00350-6.
Generative artificial intelligence (AI) tools have been selectively adopted across the academic community to help researchers complete tasks in a more efficient manner. The widespread release of the Chat Generative Pre-trained Transformer (ChatGPT) platform in 2022 has made these tools more accessible to scholars around the world. Despite their tremendous potential, studies have uncovered that large language model (LLM)-based generative AI tools have issues with plagiarism, AI hallucinations, and inaccurate or fabricated references. This raises legitimate concern about the utility, accuracy, and integrity of AI when used to write academic manuscripts. Currently, there is little clear guidance for healthcare simulation scholars outlining the ways that generative AI could be used to legitimately support the production of academic literature. In this paper, we discuss how widely available, LLM-powered generative AI tools (e.g. ChatGPT) can help in the academic writing process. We first explore how academic publishers are positioning the use of generative AI tools and then describe potential issues with using these tools in the academic writing process. Finally, we discuss three categories of specific ways generative AI tools can be used in an ethically sound manner and offer four key principles that can help guide researchers to produce high-quality research outputs with the highest of academic integrity.
生成式人工智能(AI)工具已在学术界被有选择地采用,以帮助研究人员更高效地完成任务。2022年Chat生成式预训练变换器(ChatGPT)平台的广泛发布,使世界各地的学者更容易使用这些工具。尽管它们具有巨大潜力,但研究发现,基于大语言模型(LLM)的生成式AI工具存在抄袭、AI幻觉以及不准确或编造参考文献等问题。这引发了人们对使用AI撰写学术手稿时其效用、准确性和完整性的合理担忧。目前,对于医疗模拟领域的学者而言,几乎没有明确的指导方针来概述生成式AI可用于合法支持学术文献创作的方式。在本文中,我们将探讨广泛可用的、由LLM驱动的生成式AI工具(如ChatGPT)如何在学术写作过程中提供帮助。我们首先探讨学术出版商如何看待生成式AI工具的使用,然后描述在学术写作过程中使用这些工具可能存在的问题。最后,我们讨论生成式AI工具可以以符合道德规范的方式使用的三类具体方法,并提供四项关键原则,以帮助指导研究人员在保持最高学术诚信的前提下产出高质量的研究成果。
Adv Simul (Lond). 2025-4-18
J Infect Dev Ctries. 2023-9-30
Health Info Libr J. 2023-12
Medicine (Baltimore). 2024-10-4
J Nurs Educ. 2024-2-5
Adv Simul (Lond). 2025-6-2
Curr Osteoporos Rep. 2024-2
Nat Med. 2023-8
J Stomatol Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2023-10