Pavone Matteo, Baby Britty, Carles Emma, Innocenzi Chiara, Baroni Alessandro, Arboit Lorenzo, Murali Aditya, Rosati Andrea, Iacobelli Valentina, Fagotti Anna, Fanfani Francesco, Akladios Cherif, Querleu Denis, Bizzarri Nicolò, Lecointre Lise, Mascagni Pietro, Padoy Nicolas, Scambia Giovanni
IHU Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France; UOC Ginecologia Oncologica, Dipartimento di Scienze per la salute della Donna e del Bambino e di Sanità Pubblica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy; University of Strasbourg, UMR 7357 CNRS, ICube, Strasbourg, France; IRCAD Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France.
IHU Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France; University of Strasbourg, UMR 7357 CNRS, ICube, Strasbourg, France.
Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2025 May;35(5):101789. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgc.2025.101789. Epub 2025 Mar 27.
This study aims to evaluate the feasibility of video-based assessment rate of Critical Views of Safety criteria for sentinel lymph node dissection in endometrial and cervical cancer. Goal of these Critical Views of Safety is to help standardize the evaluation of surgical quality, improve the precision of sentinel lymph node identification, and lead to better patient outcomes.
This international multi-center observational prospective study was conducted from April to September 2024. Surgical videos from patients with cervical and endometrial carcinoma undergoing minimally invasive sentinel lymph node dissection were collected. A total of 3 Critical Views of Safety criteria (lateral pararectal space, lateral paravesical space, internal iliac artery) were proposed based on the anatomical structures defined as mandatory to be identified before sentinel node dissection, according to previously published expert consensus. A total of 3 independent surgeons, blinded to each other's assessments, evaluated whether the proposed criteria were identifiable in the endoscopic surgical video to establish applicability (content validity) and inter-rater agreement (reliability).
A total of 80 patients were enrolled, of these, 71 cases (88.8%) had videos suitable for annotation, 64 (90.1%) underwent sentinel lymph node dissection for endometrial cancer, and 7 (9.9%) for cervical cancer; the median age was 52 years (IQR 34-71) and median body mass index was 28.8 kg/m (IQR 23.7-32.17). The lateral pararectal space was identified in 62% of videos, the lateral paravesical space in 94%, and the internal iliac artery in the 32%. Inter-rater reliability was high for the lateral pararectal and paravesical spaces (Fleiss κ of 0.90) and moderate for the internal iliac artery (Fleiss κ of 0.73).
The low assessment rate of the internal iliac artery criteria should raise concerns about missing sentinel lymph nodes in the internal iliac and pre-sacral area. The assessment of such standardized safety criteria could potentially standardize the procedures, thereby improving adherence to guidelines. The introduction of the video assessment of these criteria lays the foundation for exploring the feasibility of artificial intelligence algorithms to automatically assess and document the Critical Views of Safety in surgical videos.
本研究旨在评估基于视频的子宫内膜癌和宫颈癌前哨淋巴结清扫安全关键视野评估率的可行性。这些安全关键视野的目标是帮助规范手术质量评估,提高前哨淋巴结识别的准确性,并带来更好的患者预后。
这项国际多中心观察性前瞻性研究于2024年4月至9月进行。收集了接受微创前哨淋巴结清扫的宫颈癌和子宫内膜癌患者的手术视频。根据先前发表的专家共识,基于在前哨淋巴结清扫前必须识别的解剖结构,共提出了3项安全关键视野标准(直肠旁外侧间隙、膀胱旁外侧间隙、髂内动脉)。共有3名相互不知情的独立外科医生评估所提出的标准在内镜手术视频中是否可识别,以确定其适用性(内容效度)和评分者间一致性(信度)。
共纳入80例患者,其中71例(88.8%)有适合标注的视频,64例(90.1%)接受了子宫内膜癌前哨淋巴结清扫,7例(9.9%)接受了宫颈癌前哨淋巴结清扫;中位年龄为52岁(四分位间距34 - 71岁),中位体重指数为28.8 kg/m²(四分位间距23.7 - 32.17)。62%的视频中可识别直肠旁外侧间隙,94%的视频中可识别膀胱旁外侧间隙,32%的视频中可识别髂内动脉。直肠旁外侧间隙和膀胱旁外侧间隙的评分者间信度较高(Fleiss κ为0.90),髂内动脉的评分者间信度中等(Fleiss κ为0.73)。
髂内动脉标准的低评估率应引起对髂内和骶前区域前哨淋巴结遗漏的关注。对这类标准化安全标准的评估可能会规范手术程序,从而提高对指南的依从性。引入这些标准的视频评估为探索人工智能算法自动评估和记录手术视频中安全关键视野的可行性奠定了基础。