Krishnan Lakshmi, Commodore-Mensah Yvonne, Gleason Kelly T, Rastall David P W, Newman-Toker David E, McDonald Kathy
Department of Medicine, Georgetown University, Washington, District of Columbia, USA
Department of English, Georgetown University, Washington, District of Columbia, USA.
BMJ Open Qual. 2025 Apr 20;14(2):e003135. doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2024-003135.
Diagnostic disparities significantly impact health outcomes, with various factors influencing differential access and treatment across communities. This paper explores the complex landscape of diagnosis and of variable diagnostic journeys, focusing on the multifaceted nature of diagnostic inequities and proposing a socioecological model to understand and address these disparities.
The authors employed an interdisciplinary approach, synthesising insights from their respective knowledge domains. Through iterative discussions, visual diagramming and narrative development, a new framework was constructed to address the complexity of diagnostic inequities.
The 'diagnostic environment' model was developed, conceptualising diagnosis beyond the biomedical process to include three levels of influence: atmospheric (broad, pervasive societal factors), surface (direct healthcare interactions) and subterranean (underlying, often invisible societal norms and biases). This model integrates process, social phenomena and multilevel influences to more comprehensively address diagnostic disparities. Two additional frameworks: diagnostic journeys within this environment and issue constellations guiding navigation and intervention were developed.
Diagnostic processes are influenced by a range of factors from individual to systemic levels, often leading to significant disparities in health outcomes. The proposed model offers a framework for understanding these disparities and suggests targeted interventions to address them. By integrating diverse perspectives and focusing on multilevel influences, the framework aims to improve diagnostic equity.
This study highlights the need for a more holistic approach to diagnosis, acknowledging the complex interplay of factors that contribute to diagnostic disparities. The socioecological model provides a basis for future research and policy interventions aimed at reducing these disparities and improving overall diagnostic accuracy and equity.
诊断差异对健康结果有重大影响,多种因素影响着不同社区获得诊断和治疗的机会。本文探讨了诊断的复杂情况以及多样的诊断过程,重点关注诊断不平等的多方面性质,并提出一个社会生态模型来理解和解决这些差异。
作者采用跨学科方法,综合各自知识领域的见解。通过反复讨论、可视化绘图和叙述发展,构建了一个新框架来应对诊断不平等的复杂性。
开发了“诊断环境”模型,将诊断概念从生物医学过程扩展到包括三个影响层面:大气层面(广泛、普遍的社会因素)、表面层面(直接的医疗保健互动)和地下层面(潜在的、通常不可见的社会规范和偏见)。该模型整合了过程、社会现象和多层次影响,以更全面地解决诊断差异问题。还开发了另外两个框架:此环境中的诊断过程以及指导导航和干预的问题群组。
诊断过程受到从个体到系统层面的一系列因素影响,常常导致健康结果出现重大差异。所提出的模型提供了一个理解这些差异的框架,并建议了针对性的干预措施来解决这些差异。通过整合不同观点并关注多层次影响,该框架旨在提高诊断公平性。
本研究强调需要一种更全面的诊断方法,认识到导致诊断差异的因素之间复杂的相互作用。社会生态模型为未来旨在减少这些差异并提高整体诊断准确性和公平性的研究和政策干预提供了基础。