Suppr超能文献

我们该停药还是继续用药?多发性硬化症药物停用的最新见解。

Should we stay or should we go? Recent insights on drug discontinuation in multiple sclerosis.

作者信息

Mrochen Anne, Meuth Sven G, Pfeuffer Steffen

机构信息

Department of Neurology, University Hospital Giessen and Marburg, Justus-Liebig-University Giessen, Klinikstr. 33, 35392, Giessen, Germany.

Department of Neurology, University Hospital Duesseldorf, Heinrich-Heine-University, Duesseldorf, Germany.

出版信息

Neurol Res Pract. 2025 Apr 21;7(1):25. doi: 10.1186/s42466-025-00379-y.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The decision to discontinue disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) in patients with multiple sclerosis (PwMS) is a critical clinical challenge. Historically, DMTs were discontinued due to side effects, treatment limitations, or progression to secondary progressive MS. However, advancements in MS therapies, particularly high-efficacy DMTs (HE-DMTs) and the increased knowledge on disease courses and phenotypes have resulted in more personalized treatment approaches and introduced discussion on scheduled DMT discontinuation. This review explores the current evidence on DMT discontinuation, focusing on its implications for aging populations and the interplay between cardiovascular diseases (CVD) and MS.

CURRENT EVIDENCE AND INTERPLAY WITH CVD

Randomized trials such as DISCOMS and DOT-MS have provided insights into discontinuing DMTs in stable patients. In summary, both randomized clinical trials highlight the risk of disease reactivation following treatment discontinuation. Due to the limited sample size, neither study was able to conduct subgroup analyses based on age groups. Additionally, DOT-MS was terminated prematurely, direct comparisons with other studies should be avoided. While older studies and observational data (e.g., OFSEP) have shown relapse risks associated with discontinuation, particularly for drugs like natalizumab and fingolimod, there is limited data on HE-DMT discontinuation outcomes. Comorbidities, particularly CVDs, further complicate decisions regarding the continuation of DMTs in older adults. MS patients bear a higher burden of CVD, which is also associated with unfavorable disease courses. While optimizing cardiovascular risk profiles appears advisable, it remains unclear whether DMTs themselves have a positive impact on CVDs.

CONCLUSION

Given the complexities associated with discontinuing DMTs in MS patients, it is essential to balance the avoidance of polypharmacy with the potential risks of disease reactivation and the impact of comorbidities, especially CVDs, on disease progression. The interplay between MS and CVD highlights the importance of a holistic risk assessment when considering DMT discontinuation.

摘要

背景

对于多发性硬化症患者(PwMS)而言,决定停用疾病修正疗法(DMTs)是一项关键的临床挑战。从历史上看,DMTs因副作用、治疗局限性或进展为继发进展型多发性硬化症而被停用。然而,多发性硬化症治疗方法的进步,尤其是高效DMTs(HE-DMTs),以及对疾病进程和表型认识的增加,导致了更个性化的治疗方法,并引发了关于定期停用DMTs的讨论。本综述探讨了目前关于停用DMTs的证据,重点关注其对老年人群的影响以及心血管疾病(CVD)与多发性硬化症之间的相互作用。

当前证据及与心血管疾病的相互作用

诸如DISCOMS和DOT-MS等随机试验为稳定患者停用DMTs提供了见解。总之,两项随机临床试验均强调了停药后疾病再激活的风险。由于样本量有限,两项研究均无法按年龄组进行亚组分析。此外,DOT-MS提前终止,应避免与其他研究进行直接比较。虽然早期研究和观察性数据(如OFSEP)显示了停药相关的复发风险,尤其是对于那他珠单抗和芬戈莫德等药物,但关于HE-DMTs停药结果的数据有限。合并症,尤其是心血管疾病,使老年人继续使用DMTs的决策更加复杂。多发性硬化症患者承受着更高的心血管疾病负担,这也与不良的疾病进程相关。虽然优化心血管风险状况似乎是可取的,但尚不清楚DMTs本身是否对心血管疾病有积极影响。

结论

鉴于多发性硬化症患者停用DMTs存在复杂性,必须在避免多重用药与疾病再激活的潜在风险以及合并症(尤其是心血管疾病)对疾病进展的影响之间取得平衡。多发性硬化症与心血管疾病之间的相互作用凸显了在考虑停用DMTs时进行全面风险评估的重要性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/94b7/12010584/f203387ee2dc/42466_2025_379_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验