Cui Chendi, Curry Laura, Singh Nisha, Rosenthal Ning An
Premier Applied Sciences, Premier Inc., Charlotte, NC, United States.
Bristol-Myers Squibb, Dallas-Fort Worth, TX, United States.
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2025 Apr 4;12:1522154. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2025.1522154. eCollection 2025.
Non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) significantly increases ischemic stroke and systemic embolism (SE) risks. Despite the proven efficacy of oral anticoagulants (OAC) in reducing these risks, their underutilization highlights a gap in clinical practice. This study examined OAC utilization patterns within the first year after NVAF diagnosis in patients without prior OAC use and the association between the timing of OAC initiation and the risk of all-cause and stroke/SE-specific hospitalizations.
A retrospective cohort study was conducted using data from the Premier Healthcare Database and linked claims from 1/1/2017-3/31/2021. Patients newly diagnosed with NVAF, without prior OAC use, were included.
Of 23,148 adults with newly diagnosed NVAF, 11,059 (47.8%) initiated OAC within one year. OAC users predominantly had cardiovascular disease and risk factors, whereas non-OAC users had higher rates of malignancy and dementia. Early OAC initiation (74.9% during the index visit) was linked to lower hospitalization risks compared to those initiating later (29.2% vs. 45.9% for all-cause, < 0.001 and 1.3% vs. 2.6% for stroke/SE-specific, < 0.001). Adjusted odds ratios for all-cause and stroke/SE hospitalization favored early initiation were 0.35 (95% CI: 0.32-0.39) and 0.34 (95% CI: 0.24-0.47), respectively.
This study highlights OAC underutilization in NVAF patients and suggests early initiation may lower hospitalization rates. The findings emphasize the need for further research into real-world compliance with OAC guidelines and call for further research to confirm the benefits of early initiation. Personalized management strategies that consider individual patient profiles are recommended.
非瓣膜性心房颤动(NVAF)显著增加缺血性卒中及全身性栓塞(SE)风险。尽管口服抗凝药(OAC)在降低这些风险方面的疗效已得到证实,但其使用不足凸显了临床实践中的差距。本研究调查了未使用过OAC的患者在NVAF诊断后第一年的OAC使用模式,以及OAC起始时间与全因住院和卒中/SE特异性住院风险之间的关联。
利用Premier Healthcare数据库的数据及2017年1月1日至2021年3月31日的关联索赔数据进行了一项回顾性队列研究。纳入新诊断为NVAF且未使用过OAC的患者。
在23148例新诊断为NVAF的成年人中,11059例(47.8%)在1年内开始使用OAC。OAC使用者主要患有心血管疾病及风险因素,而非OAC使用者的恶性肿瘤和痴呆发生率较高。与延迟起始OAC的患者相比,早期起始OAC(索引就诊期间为74.9%)与较低的住院风险相关(全因住院风险分别为29.2%和45.9%,P<0.001;卒中/SE特异性住院风险分别为1.3%和2.6%,P<0.001)。早期起始OAC的全因住院和卒中/SE住院的校正比值比分别为0.35(95%CI:0.32 - 0.39)和0.34(95%CI:0.24 - 0.47)。
本研究凸显了NVAF患者中OAC使用不足的情况,并表明早期起始可能降低住院率。研究结果强调需要进一步研究OAC指南在现实世界中的依从性,并呼吁进一步研究以证实早期起始的益处。建议采用考虑个体患者特征的个性化管理策略。