Nichter L S, Haines P C
Am J Surg. 1985 Aug;150(2):191-6. doi: 10.1016/0002-9610(85)90117-5.
The results of our experiment prove that arterialized venous perfusion is a viable means of nourishing complex composite tissue without using the arterial tree. Previous laboratory findings, coupled with the results of this experiment, demonstrate that as long as proximal arterial inflow is ensured, both the arterial and venous trees need not be intact to keep tissue alive. Rather, it seems that the prerequisites for tissue survival are that at least one of the two systems be intact and that there be sufficient inflow and outflow channels available. Whether these channels are arteries or veins is probably not important. The use of properly placed efferent or afferent arteriovenous fistulas allows one system to provide both physiologic functions. Whether the efferent arterial anastomosis stays open over the long term appears to be inconsequential. Survival is ensured by either direct perfusion with oxygen delivery through the venous tree or through the eventual ingrowth of recipient vessels into the flap by way of the delay phenomena. This perfusion technique is ideally suited for tissue with an inadequate arterial tree but with an intact venous system devoid of venous valves (most veins less than 1.5 mm in diameter). A well-vascularized recipient bed capable of providing vessel ingrowth into transferred tissue may be important in the case of delayed arteriovenous fistula occlusion secondary to intimal hyperplasia; therefore, further experimental study of these flaps must be undertaken before arterialized venous flaps can be recommended for placement in recipient sites compromised due to radiation, ischemia, diabetes, or other causes of small vessel disease in the recipient bed. Although efferent arteriovenous fistulas are currently used to provide arterialized venous perfusion in selected cases of end stage arterial occlusive and vasospastic disease, perhaps their greatest role is in the management of tissue transfer with an inadequate arterial tree. Much knowledge must be gained to understand the physiologic principles and requirements for optimal perfusion. Many questions are left unanswered. For example, in those arteriovenous fistulas that narrow or occlude secondary to neointimal hyperplasia or other causes, which channels (veins or arteries?) are used for perfusion during recipient vessel growth? Can intimal hyperplasia be reversed or prevented by drug therapy and would this be advantageous? Can venous valves be made incompetent so that this technique can be used for larger vessels?(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)
我们的实验结果证明,动脉化静脉灌注是在不使用动脉血管树的情况下滋养复杂复合组织的一种可行方法。先前的实验室研究结果,再加上本实验的结果,表明只要确保近端动脉血流,动脉和静脉血管树不完整也能维持组织存活。相反,组织存活的前提似乎是两个系统中至少有一个完整,并且有足够的流入和流出通道。这些通道是动脉还是静脉可能并不重要。使用放置恰当的动静脉内瘘,一个系统就能提供两种生理功能。传出动脉吻合口能否长期保持开放似乎并不重要。通过静脉血管树直接进行氧气输送灌注,或者通过延迟现象使受区血管最终长入皮瓣,都能确保组织存活。这种灌注技术非常适合动脉血管树不完整但静脉系统完整且无静脉瓣(大多数直径小于1.5毫米的静脉)的组织。对于因内膜增生导致动静脉内瘘闭塞延迟的情况,一个血管丰富的能使血管长入移植组织的受区床可能很重要;因此,在推荐将动脉化静脉皮瓣放置于因放疗、缺血、糖尿病或受区床其他小血管疾病原因而受损的受区之前,必须对这些皮瓣进行进一步的实验研究。尽管目前传出动静脉内瘘用于在选定的终末期动脉闭塞和血管痉挛性疾病病例中提供动脉化静脉灌注,但它们最大的作用可能在于处理动脉血管树不完整的组织移植。必须获取更多知识以了解最佳灌注的生理原理和要求。许多问题仍未得到解答。例如,在那些因新生内膜增生或其他原因而狭窄或闭塞的动静脉内瘘中,在受区血管生长期间哪些通道(静脉还是动脉?)用于灌注?药物治疗能否逆转或预防内膜增生,这是否有益?能否使静脉瓣失去功能,以便该技术可用于更大的血管?(摘要截于400字)