Khasawneh Mais, Mokhtare Marjan, Moayyedi Paul, Black Christopher J, Ford Alexander C
Leeds Gastroenterology Institute, St James's University Hospital, Leeds, UK; Leeds Institute of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine Colorectal Research Center, Iran; University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2025 Jun;10(6):537-549. doi: 10.1016/S2468-1253(25)00051-2. Epub 2025 Apr 18.
Gut-brain neuromodulators might be efficacious for irritable bowel syndrome (IBS), but there has been no synthesis of evidence from randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of some drug classes, and whether they have pain-modifying properties in IBS is unclear. We updated a previous systematic review and meta-analysis of RCTs examining these questions.
We searched MEDLINE (from Jan 1, 1946, to Jan 1, 2025), Embase and Embase Classic (from Jan 1, 1947, to Jan 1, 2025), and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (from database inception to Jan 1, 2025). Trials recruiting adults with IBS and that compared gut-brain neuromodulators versus placebo over at least 4 weeks of treatment were eligible. Dichotomous symptom data were pooled using a random effects model to obtain a relative risk (RR) of remaining symptomatic after therapy, with a 95% CI.
The search strategy identified 3625 citations. 28 RCTs were eligible containing 2475 patients. Ten RCTs were identified since our previous meta-analysis, containing 1348 patients. The RR of global IBS symptoms not improving with gut-brain neuromodulators versus placebo in 22 RCTs (2222 patients) was 0·77 (95% CI 0·69-0·87). The best evidence in terms of persistence of global IBS symptoms was for tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs) in 11 trials (1144 patients; RR 0·70, 0·62-0·80). The RR of abdominal pain not improving with gut-brain neuromodulators versus placebo in 19 RCTs (1792 patients) was 0·72 (95% CI 0·62-0·83). The best evidence was for TCAs in seven trials (708 patients; RR 0·69, 0·54-0·87), but there was also a benefit of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors in seven RCTs (324 patients; RR 0·74, 0·56-0·99), and serotonin and norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors in two trials (94 patients; RR 0·22, 0·08-0·59). Adverse events were not significantly more common with gut-brain neuromodulators, although rates of withdrawal due to adverse events were significantly higher. The certainty in the evidence for tricyclic antidepressants for global IBS symptoms was moderate, but it was low to very low for all other endpoints and drug classes studied.
Some gut-brain neuromodulators are efficacious in reducing global symptoms and abdominal pain in IBS. The findings support guidelines that recommend use of tricyclic antidepressants for ongoing global symptoms or abdominal pain but also highlight a potential for SSRIs to be modestly effective for abdominal pain. More data for SNRIs, azapirones, and tetracyclic antidepressants in IBS are required.
None.
肠脑神经调节剂可能对肠易激综合征(IBS)有效,但某些药物类别的随机对照试验(RCT)证据尚未进行综合分析,且它们在IBS中是否具有疼痛调节特性尚不清楚。我们更新了之前一项关于检验这些问题的RCT的系统评价和荟萃分析。
我们检索了MEDLINE(从1946年1月1日至2025年1月1日)、Embase和Embase Classic(从1947年1月1日至2025年1月1日)以及Cochrane对照试验中央注册库(从数据库建立至2025年1月1日)。纳入招募IBS成年患者且在至少4周治疗期间比较肠脑神经调节剂与安慰剂的试验。使用随机效应模型汇总二分类症状数据,以获得治疗后仍有症状的相对风险(RR)及95%置信区间(CI)。
检索策略共识别出3625条引文。28项RCT符合纳入标准,共2475例患者。自我们之前的荟萃分析以来,新识别出10项RCT,共1348例患者。在22项RCT(2222例患者)中,与安慰剂相比,肠脑神经调节剂未能改善整体IBS症状的RR为0.77(95%CI 0.69 - 0.87)。就整体IBS症状持续存在而言,最佳证据来自11项试验(1144例患者)中的三环类抗抑郁药(TCAs)(RR 0.70,0.62 - 0.80)。在19项RCT(1792例患者)中,与安慰剂相比,肠脑神经调节剂未能改善腹痛的RR为0.72(95%CI 0.62 - 0.83)。最佳证据来自7项试验(708例患者)中的TCAs(RR 0.69,0.54 - 0.87),但在7项RCT(324例患者)中选择性5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂(SSRIs)也有获益(RR 0.74,0.56 - 0.99),在2项试验(94例患者)中5-羟色胺和去甲肾上腺素再摄取抑制剂(SNRIs)也有获益(RR 0.22,0.08 - 0.59)。肠脑神经调节剂的不良事件并不显著更常见,尽管因不良事件导致的停药率显著更高。三环类抗抑郁药对整体IBS症状的证据确定性为中等,但对所有其他研究的终点和药物类别而言,证据确定性为低至极低。
一些肠脑神经调节剂在减轻IBS的整体症状和腹痛方面有效。这些发现支持推荐使用三环类抗抑郁药治疗持续存在的整体症状或腹痛的指南,但也凸显了SSRI对腹痛可能有一定疗效。IBS中关于SNRI、阿扎哌隆和四环类抗抑郁药还需要更多数据。
无。