Xiong Grace, Zhou Ted, Bose Reetesh, Li Monica, Ogunyemi Boluwaji, Abu-Hilal Mohannad
McMaster University Michael G DeGroote School of Medicine, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Department of Dermatology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
BMJ Lead. 2025 Apr 21. doi: 10.1136/leader-2024-001130.
BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: Medical leadership and education which reflects the diversity of patient populations are crucial to equitable healthcare experiences and outcomes. This study aims to assess the current landscape of diversity in dermatology leadership and educational curricula in Canada. We also sought to collect and summarise recommendations made by current dermatology leaders about how to improve diversity in the field.
This cross-sectional study assessed the self-reported racial/ethnic backgrounds and Fitzpatrick skin types of Canadian dermatology leaders. Individuals who held one or more leadership positions in the past 10 years were identified and sent an anonymous, online survey. Respondent's demographic information and perspectives on diversity in dermatology were analysed with proportions and thematic analysis, respectively.
The survey response rate was 50.0% (55/110). 65.5% (36/55) of respondents identified as White/Caucasian. More respondents identified as having Fitzpatrick skin types 1-2 (65.5%) compared with Fitzpatrick skin types 3-6 (34.5%). More respondents (68.9%) holding leadership positions in national, provincial or regional societies identified as White/Caucasian compared with leaders in academic or research roles (56.5%). Most respondents believed that Black, Indigenous and people of colour are not sufficiently represented in Canadian dermatology leadership and that skin of colour is not adequately represented in dermatology educational curricula.
Our study suggests a potential underrepresentation of racial and ethnic minorities in Canadian dermatologists in national, provincial and regional society leadership positions. Most Canadian dermatologists previously or currently holding leadership roles believe that further efforts are necessary to improve equity, diversity and inclusion in the field.
背景/目的:反映患者群体多样性的医学领导力和教育对于公平的医疗体验和结果至关重要。本研究旨在评估加拿大皮肤科领导力和教育课程中当前的多样性状况。我们还试图收集并总结当前皮肤科领导者提出的关于如何改善该领域多样性的建议。
这项横断面研究评估了加拿大皮肤科领导者自我报告的种族/族裔背景和菲茨帕特里克皮肤类型。确定了在过去10年中担任一个或多个领导职位的个人,并向他们发送了一份匿名在线调查问卷。分别用比例分析和主题分析来分析受访者的人口统计学信息和对皮肤科多样性的看法。
调查回复率为50.0%(55/110)。65.5%(36/55)的受访者认定为白人/高加索人。与菲茨帕特里克皮肤类型3 - 6(34.5%)相比,更多受访者认定为具有菲茨帕特里克皮肤类型1 - 2(65.5%)。在国家、省级或地区性学会担任领导职务的受访者中,认定为白人/高加索人的比例(68.9%)高于学术或研究岗位的领导者(56.5%)。大多数受访者认为,黑人、原住民和有色人种在加拿大皮肤科领导力中没有得到充分代表,并且有色人种皮肤在皮肤科教育课程中也没有得到充分体现。
我们的研究表明,在加拿大皮肤科医生中,少数族裔在国家、省级和地区性学会领导职位上可能代表性不足。大多数曾担任或现任领导职务的加拿大皮肤科医生认为,有必要进一步努力改善该领域的公平性、多样性和包容性。