Etoumbe Robert Maurice, Fortin Carole, Dieterlen Éloi, Marteau Étienne, Duclos Cyril
School of Rehabilitation, Faculty of Medicine, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Canada.
Centre de Recherche Azrieli du CHU Sainte-Justine, Montreal, Canada.
Exp Brain Res. 2025 Apr 21;243(5):124. doi: 10.1007/s00221-025-07069-w.
The present study aimed to investigate whether proprioceptive stimulation by means of multiple muscle vibration (MV) can induce perceptual and actual trunk responses that may differ according to the stability of the body position during stimulation. Fifteen healthy young adults (25.2 ± 4.3 years old) were recruited. Muscle vibration at 80 Hz was applied to multiple abdominal and spinal muscles in sitting and standing positions with the eyes closed in order to see whether position could affect trunk responses. Perceptions and actual trunk movements were assessed using a numeric rating scale (0: no movement perception - 10: vivid movement perception) and a 3D movement analysis system (VICON), respectively. Statistical tests were used to compare different MV conditions in sitting and standing positions and correlations between outcomes. MV induced perceptions of trunk movements, with same median scores (inter-quartile range) of 5.5(3.5)/10 in both sitting and standing positions. Perception of movement in most MV conditions was mostly (37.5-75%) directed toward the direction of concentric contraction of the stimulated muscles, contrary to what is usually expected. The actual movement direction of the trunk aligned with the perceived movement, with average amplitudes in sitting and standing positions between 1.0 and 5.0° depending on the planes of movement and conditions. Amplitude of actual movement and perception scores were moderately correlated, in sitting and standing positions (ρ = 0.38, p < 0.001, both). Findings confirm that MV can temporarily modify the perception and the actual trunk posture in healthy individuals and warrant further investigation in individuals with altered trunk postures.
本研究旨在探讨通过多肌肉振动(MV)进行本体感觉刺激是否能诱发感知性和实际的躯干反应,这些反应可能会因刺激过程中身体姿势的稳定性而有所不同。招募了15名健康的年轻成年人(25.2±4.3岁)。在闭眼的坐姿和站姿下,对多块腹部和脊柱肌肉施加80Hz的肌肉振动,以观察姿势是否会影响躯干反应。分别使用数字评分量表(0:无运动感知 - 10:清晰的运动感知)和3D运动分析系统(VICON)评估感知和实际的躯干运动。使用统计检验比较坐姿和站姿下不同的MV条件以及结果之间的相关性。MV诱发了躯干运动的感知,坐姿和站姿下的中位数得分(四分位间距)均为5.5(3.5)/10。在大多数MV条件下,运动感知大多(37.5 - 75%)指向受刺激肌肉的向心收缩方向,这与通常的预期相反。躯干的实际运动方向与感知运动一致,坐姿和站姿下的平均幅度在1.0至5.0°之间,具体取决于运动平面和条件。实际运动幅度和感知得分在坐姿和站姿下均呈中度相关(ρ = 0.38,p < 0.001)。研究结果证实,MV可以暂时改变健康个体的感知和实际躯干姿势,并且有必要对躯干姿势改变的个体进行进一步研究。