Suppr超能文献

与腹腔镜手术相比,机器人手术并不能消除减重手术中的第一助手。

Robotic approach does not eliminate first assistant in bariatric surgery compared to laparoscopy.

作者信息

Pina Luis, Eufemio Conor M, Dove James, Craig Wood G, Mahan Mark, Falvo Alexandra, Horsley Ryan, Mohammad Benefsha, Obradovic Vladan, Petrick Anthony T, Parker David M

机构信息

Division of Bariatric and Foregut Surgery and The Obesity Institute, Geisinger Health System, 100 N Academy Ave, Danville, PA, 17822, USA.

出版信息

Surg Endosc. 2025 Jun;39(6):3568-3575. doi: 10.1007/s00464-025-11719-z. Epub 2025 Apr 21.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy (LSG) and Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass (LRYGB) constitute the most commonly performed bariatric metabolic surgery (BMS) procedures in the USA. The number of robotic-assisted BMS cases remains low, primarily due to the increased cost and extended operative time associated with this technology. Our primary objective is to assess whether robotic platform reduces the need for a surgical first assistant (FA). Our secondary objective is to compare the utilization of skilled surgical assistants.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective analysis of the MBSAQIP Participant Use File cohort spanning from 2015 to 2019 to determine the prevalence of Attending Surgeon involvement in robotic-assisted, laparoscopic RYGB, and SG procedures, in comparison to non-physician surgical First Assistants. Cases involving medical trainees (residents and fellows) were excluded from the analysis. For each bariatric procedure, we established two distinct groups and employed propensity score matching to ensure patient comparability. A "good match" was defined as a standardized mean difference (SMD) of less than 0.10. All statistical analyses were two-sided, with a significance level set at P < 0.05.

RESULTS

A total of 113,682 patients underwent LRYGB, with 12,480 undergoing robotic RYGB (RRYGB). After a 1:1 match, attending-level FAs were involved in 25.9% of LRYGB cases, mid-level FAs in 55.6%, and no assistants in 18.5%. In contrast, RRYGB cases utilized attending-level FAs in 13.7% of cases, mid-level FAs in 68.4%, and had no assistants in 17.9% of cases (P < 0.0001). In LSG, attending-level FAs were present in 28.1% of cases, mid-level FAs in 51.6%, and no assistants in 20.3%. In comparison, robotic SG (RSG) cases had attending-level FAs in 16.1%, mid-level FAs in 55.6%, and no assistants in 28.3% of cases (P < 0.0001).

CONCLUSION

The robotic platform failed to show a reduction in the need for an assistant in Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass (RYGB) procedures but did lead to a decrease in the number of assistants required in sleeve gastrectomy (SG). Mid-level assistance was necessary for the majority of robotic and laparoscopic bariatric metabolic cases. The robotic platform was associated with an approximate 12% reduction in the requirement for attending-level assistance in robotic procedures.

摘要

引言

腹腔镜袖状胃切除术(LSG)和腹腔镜Roux-en-Y胃旁路术(LRYGB)是美国最常开展的减重代谢手术(BMS)术式。机器人辅助BMS病例数量仍然较少,主要是因为这项技术成本增加且手术时间延长。我们的主要目标是评估机器人平台是否减少了对手术第一助手(FA)的需求。我们的次要目标是比较熟练手术助手的使用情况。

方法

我们对2015年至2019年的MBSAQIP参与者使用文件队列进行了回顾性分析,以确定与非医师手术第一助手相比,主刀医生参与机器人辅助、腹腔镜RYGB和SG手术的比例。涉及医学实习生(住院医师和研究员)的病例被排除在分析之外。对于每种减重手术,我们建立了两个不同的组,并采用倾向得分匹配以确保患者的可比性。“良好匹配”定义为标准化均数差(SMD)小于0.10。所有统计分析均为双侧,显著性水平设定为P < 0.05。

结果

共有113,682例患者接受了LRYGB手术,其中12,480例接受了机器人辅助RYGB(RRYGB)手术。在1:1匹配后,主刀级FA参与了25.9%的LRYGB病例,中级FA参与了55.6%的病例,18.5%的病例没有助手。相比之下,RRYGB病例中13.7%的病例使用了主刀级FA,68.4%使用了中级FA,17.9%的病例没有助手(P < 0.0001)。在LSG中,28.1%的病例有主刀级FA,51.6%有中级FA,20.3%没有助手。相比之下,机器人辅助SG(RSG)病例中16.1%有主刀级FA,55.6%有中级FA,28.3%没有助手(P < 0.0001)。

结论

机器人平台在Roux-en-Y胃旁路术(RYGB)手术中未能显示出对助手需求的减少,但确实导致了袖状胃切除术(SG)所需助手数量的减少。大多数机器人和腹腔镜减重代谢病例需要中级助手。机器人平台使机器人手术中对主刀级助手的需求减少了约12%。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验