Zhang Xu, Zhang Liwei, Geng Ziyi, Shang Meimei, Wang Aijun, Zheng Xing, Li Chao, Zhang Tingting, Yang Hailing, Chen Yuanyuan
School of Nursing and Rehabilitation, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, 250012, China.
Qilu Hospital of Shandong University, Jinan, 250012, China.
BMC Cancer. 2025 Apr 21;25(1):740. doi: 10.1186/s12885-025-14076-1.
Financial Toxicity (FT) is prevalent among lung cancer patients. Identifying high-risk groups and implementing comprehensive, targeted interventions can alleviate FT and improve patients' quality of life. Hence, the objective of this study was to analyze the status and potential profiles of FT in lung cancer patients and explore the related factors of FT levels in different categories of lung cancer patients.
A cross-sectional design was used in this study. A total of 421 patients with lung cancer hospitalized in the oncology department of a Grade A general hospital and a provincial oncology hospital in Shandong Province from October to December 2023 were selected by convenience sampling. General data questionnaires, FT scale for reported outcomes of cancer patients, Chinese version of the Quality of Life Scale for lung cancer patients, Social Support Rating Scale and simplified version of the Mental Resilience Scale were used. Potential profile analysis of FT levels in lung cancer patients was performed, and multiple logistic regression was used to analyze the related factors of FT levels in different categories.
Among 421 lung cancer patients, the median FT (FT) score was 16 (IQR: 9-24). Latent profile analysis identified four distinct FT patterns: mild (19.5%), moderate resource-deficient (7.8%), moderate balanced (35.6%), and severe (37.1%). Multivariate analysis revealed significant associations between FT severity and hospitalization frequency, lifestyle modifications, employment status, insurance coverage, education level, social support, emotional distress, family resilience, problem-solving capacity, and social resource utilization.
FT demonstrates high prevalence and substantial heterogeneity in lung cancer patients, with over 70% experiencing moderate-to-severe levels. Clinical interventions should prioritize early screening and stratified management through psychological support, financial navigation programs, cost-containment strategies, and enhanced health literacy to alleviate economic burdens and optimize treatment outcomes.
经济毒性(FT)在肺癌患者中普遍存在。识别高危人群并实施全面、有针对性的干预措施可以减轻经济毒性并提高患者的生活质量。因此,本研究的目的是分析肺癌患者经济毒性的现状和潜在特征,并探讨不同类别肺癌患者经济毒性水平的相关因素。
本研究采用横断面设计。通过便利抽样选取了2023年10月至12月在山东省一家三甲综合医院和一家省级肿瘤医院肿瘤科住院的421例肺癌患者。使用了一般数据问卷、癌症患者报告结局的经济毒性量表、中文版肺癌患者生活质量量表、社会支持评定量表和心理弹性量表简化版。对肺癌患者的经济毒性水平进行潜在特征分析,并采用多因素逻辑回归分析不同类别经济毒性水平的相关因素。
在421例肺癌患者中,经济毒性(FT)得分中位数为16(四分位间距:9 - 24)。潜在特征分析确定了四种不同的经济毒性模式:轻度(19.5%)、中度资源缺乏型(7.8%)、中度平衡型(35.6%)和重度(