Suppr超能文献

腹腔镜保留肾包膜切除术与肾部分切除术治疗肾血管平滑肌脂肪瘤的围手术期疗效及适应证比较:一项长达十年的回顾性研究

Comparison of perioperative efficacy and indications between laparoscopic capsule-preserving resection and partial nephrectomy for renal angiomyolipoma: a decade-long retrospective study.

作者信息

Zhang Haipeng, Yang Guangcan, Tian Changxiu, Song Wei, Zhang Houliang, Ni Jinliang, Jiang Ziming, Wang Keyi, Peng Bo

机构信息

Department of Urology, Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai, 200072, China.

Department of Urology, Affiliated Zhongda Hospital of Southeast University, Nanjing, China.

出版信息

World J Surg Oncol. 2025 Apr 21;23(1):151. doi: 10.1186/s12957-025-03764-8.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

This study aims to compare and evaluate the clinical efficacy of laparoscopic capsule-preserving resection (LCPR) and laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (LPN) in the treatment of renal angiomyolipoma (RAML). Multivariate regression analysis was employed to identify patient characteristics that are most suited for LCPR.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of 209 patients diagnosed with RAML and treated surgically at our hospital between January 2010 and December 2023. The patients were divided into two groups: 102 in the LCPR group and 109 in the LPN group. Preoperative factors (e.g., age, sex, glomerular filtration rate (GFR), and tumor location), intraoperative factors (e.g., ischemia time and blood loss), and postoperative outcomes (e.g., extubation time, hospitalization duration, and renal function) were recorded. Chi-square tests, independent sample t-tests, and rank-sum tests were applied where appropriate. Logistic regression analysis was used to identify patient characteristics associated with suitability for LCPR.

RESULTS

No significant differences were observed in the preoperative baseline characteristics (age, sex, or tumor size) between the two groups (P > 0.05). All surgeries in the LCPR group were successfully completed, and no patients required conversion to open surgery. The average operation time was 118.56 ± 44.49 min, the warm ischemia time was 17.40 ± 7.51 min, and the intraoperative blood loss was 197.35 ± 282.64 ml, all of which were significantly lower than in the LPN group (P < 0.05). The incidence of postoperative complications in the LCPR group was 21.6% for Clavien-Dindo grade I and 2.9% for higher-grade complications, significantly lower than the LPN group (33.6% and 8.4%, respectively; P = 0.02). The average postoperative hospital stay in the LCPR group was 6.42 ± 3.01 days, significantly shorter than in the LPN group (9.27 ± 3.24 days; P < 0.001). The average GFR 1-3 days after surgery and the renal function grade 3 months post-surgery were significantly better in the LCPR group compared to the LPN group (P = 0.001). Multivariate regression analysis identified that patients with low preoperative serum creatinine levels, mild clinical symptoms, tumors smaller than 6 cm, and tumors located near the middle of the kidney were more likely to undergo LCPR (P < 0.05). These patients also experienced less renal function deterioration post-surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

Laparoscopic capsule-preserving tumor resection offers significant clinical advantages in treating renal angiomyolipoma. Compared to traditional laparoscopic partial nephrectomy, LCPR results in less intraoperative blood loss, shorter warm ischemia times, lower complication rates, and faster postoperative recovery. Patients with mild clinical symptoms, small tumors, or tumors located in complex regions such as the renal hilum are more suitable for this surgical approach, making it a promising technique for broader clinical application.

摘要

背景

本研究旨在比较和评估腹腔镜保留肾包膜切除术(LCPR)与腹腔镜部分肾切除术(LPN)治疗肾血管平滑肌脂肪瘤(RAML)的临床疗效。采用多因素回归分析确定最适合LCPR的患者特征。

方法

回顾性分析2010年1月至2023年12月在我院确诊为RAML并接受手术治疗的209例患者的临床资料。患者分为两组:LCPR组102例,LPN组109例。记录术前因素(如年龄、性别、肾小球滤过率(GFR)和肿瘤位置)、术中因素(如缺血时间和失血量)及术后结果(如拔管时间、住院时间和肾功能)。在适当情况下应用卡方检验、独立样本t检验和秩和检验。采用逻辑回归分析确定与LCPR适用性相关的患者特征。

结果

两组术前基线特征(年龄、性别或肿瘤大小)无显著差异(P>0.05)。LCPR组所有手术均顺利完成,无患者需要转为开放手术。LCPR组平均手术时间为118.56±44.49分钟,热缺血时间为17.40±7.51分钟,术中失血量为197.35±282.64毫升,均显著低于LPN组(P<0.05)。LCPR组术后Clavien-Dindo I级并发症发生率为21.6%,高级别并发症发生率为2.9%,显著低于LPN组(分别为33.6%和8.4%;P=0.02)。LCPR组术后平均住院时间为6.42±3.01天,显著短于LPN组(9.27±3.24天;P<0.001)。与LPN组相比,LCPR组术后1-3天的平均GFR及术后3个月的肾功能分级明显更好(P=0.001)。多因素回归分析确定,术前血清肌酐水平低、临床症状轻、肿瘤小于6厘米且位于肾中部附近的患者更有可能接受LCPR(P<0.05)。这些患者术后肾功能恶化也较少。

结论

腹腔镜保留肿瘤包膜切除术在治疗肾血管平滑肌脂肪瘤方面具有显著的临床优势。与传统腹腔镜部分肾切除术相比,LCPR术中失血量更少、热缺血时间更短、并发症发生率更低且术后恢复更快。临床症状轻、肿瘤小或位于肾门等复杂区域的肿瘤患者更适合这种手术方式,使其成为一种有广阔临床应用前景的技术。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6c37/12012939/f1d38f054ea6/12957_2025_3764_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验