Chen Peng, Zhang Xiao, Zheng Xinzhe, Tang Yang, Song Yongxiang, Xu Gang, Ke Xixian, Chen Cheng
Department of Thoracic Surgery, Affiliated Hospital of Zunyi Medical University, Zunyi, Guizhou, China.
Front Surg. 2025 Apr 7;12:1553699. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2025.1553699. eCollection 2025.
Antifungal therapy is a common treatment option for pulmonary aspergillosis, but its use to prevent recurrence and relieve symptoms in patients with pulmonary aspergillosis remains controversial. This study aimed to explore the short-term efficacy and cost of itraconazole vs. voriconazole in the treatment of pulmonary aspergillosis during the perioperative period.
We retrospectively collected the clinical data of 55 patients with pulmonary aspergillosis who underwent surgery and received itraconazole or voriconazole as antifungal therapy between January 1, 2016, and October 31, 2022, at the Department of Thoracic Surgery, Affiliated Hospital of Zunyi Medical University. We analyzed the effects of different antifungal therapies on the incidence of adverse events, short-term efficacy, and cost-effectiveness of pulmonary aspergillosis treatment.
Except for the younger average age of patients in the itraconazole group, there were no significant differences in baseline characteristics such as sex, BMI, underlying lung disease, accompanying symptoms, and lesion location between the voriconazole and itraconazole groups. There was no significant difference in the incidence of adverse events or short-term efficacy, including recovery, symptom improvement, and recurrence rates, during the administration of the antifungal regimens between the two groups. Regarding economic cost efficiency, there was no significant difference in the median hospitalization costs between the two groups. However, despite the longer antifungal treatment duration in the itraconazole group, the cost of itraconazole was significantly lower than that of voriconazole.
Both itraconazole and voriconazole effectively prevented the recurrence of pulmonary aspergillosis. They are similar in terms of the incidence of adverse events and short-term efficacy; however, itraconazole is more economical.
抗真菌治疗是肺曲霉病的常见治疗选择,但其用于预防肺曲霉病患者复发和缓解症状仍存在争议。本研究旨在探讨围手术期伊曲康唑与伏立康唑治疗肺曲霉病的短期疗效和成本。
我们回顾性收集了2016年1月1日至2022年10月31日期间在遵义医科大学附属医院胸外科接受手术并接受伊曲康唑或伏立康唑作为抗真菌治疗的55例肺曲霉病患者的临床资料。我们分析了不同抗真菌治疗对不良事件发生率、短期疗效以及肺曲霉病治疗成本效益的影响。
除伊曲康唑组患者的平均年龄较小外,伏立康唑组和伊曲康唑组在性别、BMI、基础肺部疾病、伴随症状和病变部位等基线特征方面无显著差异。两组在抗真菌治疗方案给药期间,不良事件发生率或短期疗效(包括恢复、症状改善和复发率)无显著差异。在经济成本效益方面,两组的中位住院费用无显著差异。然而,尽管伊曲康唑组的抗真菌治疗时间较长,但其成本显著低于伏立康唑。
伊曲康唑和伏立康唑均能有效预防肺曲霉病的复发。它们在不良事件发生率和短期疗效方面相似;然而,伊曲康唑更经济。