Högberg Björn
Department of Social Work, Umeå University, Umeå, SE-901 87, Sweden.
Centre for Demographic and Ageing Research, Umeå University, Umeå, SE-901 87, Sweden.
BMC Psychiatry. 2025 Apr 22;25(1):413. doi: 10.1186/s12888-025-06829-w.
A recent review of research on the association between school-related stress and internalizing problems found growing scholarly interest in the topic, but also raised questions concerning the quality and reliability of the existing knowledge base. The aim of this study was to investigate how robust the association between school-related stress and internalizing problems is to differences in model specifications.
Longitudinal survey data from between 2,991 and 4,845 Swedish adolescent students aged 13-16 years were used. A total of 57,322 different models were estimated, varying the choice of sample, measure of internalizing problems, functional form, statistical method, and combinations of included control variables. The results were summarized using specification curve analysis.
Most estimates of the association between school-related stress and internalizing problems were statistically significant at the 5% level. The choice of sample, outcome, functional form, and control variables had a limited influence on the size and significance of the estimates, but the estimates were markedly smaller and mostly non-significant in models investigating lagged effects.
This study showed that school-related stress is a robust predictor of internalizing problems as long as the association is assumed to be contemporaneous, while evidence for lagged effects was weaker. A key conclusion is that the choice of whether to estimate lagged or contemporaneous effects may be the most consequential in studies on school-related stress and internalizing problems or similar topics.
最近一项关于学校相关压力与内化问题之间关联的研究综述发现,学术界对该主题的兴趣日益浓厚,但也对现有知识库的质量和可靠性提出了质疑。本研究的目的是调查学校相关压力与内化问题之间的关联对于模型规格差异的稳健程度。
使用了来自2991至4845名13 - 16岁瑞典青少年学生的纵向调查数据。共估计了57322个不同的模型,样本选择、内化问题的测量、函数形式、统计方法以及纳入的控制变量组合各不相同。结果使用规格曲线分析进行总结。
学校相关压力与内化问题之间关联的大多数估计在5%的水平上具有统计学意义。样本、结果、函数形式和控制变量的选择对估计的大小和显著性影响有限,但在研究滞后效应的模型中,估计值明显较小且大多无统计学意义。
本研究表明,只要假定关联是同期的,学校相关压力就是内化问题的一个稳健预测因素,而滞后效应的证据则较弱。一个关键结论是,在关于学校相关压力与内化问题或类似主题的研究中,选择估计滞后效应还是同期效应可能是最为重要的。