• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

地区层面的社会经济劣势与初级医疗服务可及性:一项快速综述

Area-Level socioeconomic disadvantage and access to primary care: A rapid review.

作者信息

Staloff Jonathan A, Morenz Anna M, Hayes Sophia A, Bhatia-Lin Ananya L, Liao Joshua M

机构信息

Department of Family Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, United States.

Department of Medicine, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85724, United States.

出版信息

Health Aff Sch. 2025 Apr 2;3(4):qxaf066. doi: 10.1093/haschl/qxaf066. eCollection 2025 Apr.

DOI:10.1093/haschl/qxaf066
PMID:40264703
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12013819/
Abstract

Social drivers of health aggregate geographically, contributing to health inequities that primary care access may mitigate. Two area-level measures of social disadvantage are the Area Deprivation Index and Social Vulnerability Index. This rapid review aimed to assess the association between these measures and primary care access. We conducted a rapid review of US studies published through February 11, 2025. Included studies were categorized as defining primary care access by self-reported access to primary care, geographic accessibility, or utilization. We analyzed 31 studies, of which 68% ( = 9/13 Area Deprivation Index, = 12/18 Social Vulnerability Index) found that greater area-level social disadvantage was consistently associated with reduced primary care access. This association was most consistently observed in studies measuring primary care access via self-report ( = 2/2), vaccine uptake ( = 5/7), and via a higher odds of using telephone vs audio-visual or in-person primary care in areas of high socioeconomic disadvantage ( = 5/5). These findings have implications for telemedicine payment policy and care redesign. The possible expiration of Medicare's expanded telemedicine reimbursement may disproportionately reduce access points to primary care for individuals living in high socioeconomic disadvantage areas. These findings also support the need for community-level interventions to increase access to primary care administered vaccines.

摘要

健康的社会驱动因素在地理上呈现聚集性,导致了健康不平等现象,而初级保健服务的可及性或许能够缓解这种不平等。社会劣势的两个区域层面衡量指标是区域贫困指数和社会脆弱性指数。本快速综述旨在评估这些指标与初级保健服务可及性之间的关联。我们对截至2025年2月11日发表的美国研究进行了快速综述。纳入的研究被分类为通过自我报告的初级保健服务可及性、地理可及性或利用率来定义初级保健服务可及性。我们分析了31项研究,其中68%(区域贫困指数研究中9/13,社会脆弱性指数研究中12/18)发现,区域层面更大的社会劣势与初级保健服务可及性降低始终相关。这种关联在通过自我报告衡量初级保健服务可及性的研究中(2/2)、疫苗接种情况的研究中(5/7)以及在社会经济劣势较高地区使用电话而非视听或面对面初级保健服务的几率更高的研究中(5/5)最为一致地被观察到。这些发现对远程医疗支付政策和医疗服务重新设计具有启示意义。医疗保险扩大的远程医疗报销可能到期,这可能会不成比例地减少生活在社会经济劣势较高地区的个人获得初级保健服务的途径。这些发现还支持开展社区层面干预措施的必要性,以增加获得初级保健管理疫苗的机会。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8dd7/12013819/c9af3917f686/qxaf066f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8dd7/12013819/676b872af50f/qxaf066f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8dd7/12013819/c9af3917f686/qxaf066f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8dd7/12013819/676b872af50f/qxaf066f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8dd7/12013819/c9af3917f686/qxaf066f2.jpg

相似文献

1
Area-Level socioeconomic disadvantage and access to primary care: A rapid review.地区层面的社会经济劣势与初级医疗服务可及性:一项快速综述
Health Aff Sch. 2025 Apr 2;3(4):qxaf066. doi: 10.1093/haschl/qxaf066. eCollection 2025 Apr.
2
Community-level social determinants of health and pregestational and gestational diabetes.社区层面的健康社会决定因素与孕前和妊娠期糖尿病。
Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM. 2024 Feb;6(2):101249. doi: 10.1016/j.ajogmf.2023.101249. Epub 2023 Dec 7.
3
Assessing the Relationship Between Neighborhood Socioeconomic Disadvantage and Telemedicine Use Among Patients With Breast Cancer and Examining Differential Provisions of Oncology Services Between Telehealth and In-Person Visits: Quantitative Study.评估社区社会经济劣势与乳腺癌患者使用远程医疗之间的关系,并研究远程医疗与面对面就诊之间肿瘤服务的差异提供情况:定量研究。
JMIR Cancer. 2024 Jul 18;10:e55438. doi: 10.2196/55438.
4
Area Socioeconomic Status, Vaccination Access, and Female Human Papillomavirus Vaccination.地区社会经济地位、疫苗接种可及性与女性人乳头瘤病毒疫苗接种
JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Mar 3;8(3):e250747. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.0747.
5
Area-Level Socioeconomic Disadvantage and Health Care Spending: A Systematic Review.区域层面的社会经济劣势与医疗保健支出:系统综述。
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Feb 5;7(2):e2356121. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.56121.
6
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
7
Intersecting factors of disadvantage and discrimination and their effect on daily life during the coronavirus pandemic: the CICADA-ME mixed-methods study.新冠疫情期间不利因素与歧视的交叉影响及其对日常生活的作用:CICADA-ME混合方法研究
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2025 Feb;13(2):1-185. doi: 10.3310/KYTF4381.
8
Assessment of Population-Level Disadvantage Indices to Inform Equitable Health Policy.评估人口劣势指数,为公平健康政策提供信息。
Milbank Q. 2022 Dec;100(4):1028-1075. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.12588. Epub 2022 Dec 1.
9
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.超越黑木树:影响澳大利亚地区、农村和偏远地区的健康研究问题的快速综述。
Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881.
10
Disparities in Digital Health Care Use in 2022.2022年数字医疗保健使用方面的差异。
JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Apr 1;8(4):e255359. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.5359.

本文引用的文献

1
Individual and community socioeconomic status and receipt of influenza vaccines among adult primary care patients in a large academic health system: 2017-2019.大型学术医疗系统中成年初级保健患者的个人及社区社会经济状况与流感疫苗接种情况:2017 - 2019年
Heliyon. 2024 Nov 16;10(23):e40476. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e40476. eCollection 2024 Dec 15.
2
Disparities in Vaccination Amongst Socially Vulnerable Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease.炎症性肠病社会弱势群体患者的疫苗接种差异
Dig Dis Sci. 2025 Jan;70(1):136-145. doi: 10.1007/s10620-024-08733-x. Epub 2024 Nov 15.
3
Mobile health clinics for distribution of vaccinations to underserved communities during health emergencies: A COVID-19 case study.
在卫生紧急情况期间为服务不足社区分发疫苗的移动健康诊所:一项新冠肺炎案例研究。
Public Health Pract (Oxf). 2024 Sep 27;8:100550. doi: 10.1016/j.puhip.2024.100550. eCollection 2024 Dec.
4
Association of US county-level social vulnerability index with breast, colorectal, and lung cancer screening, incidence, and mortality rates across US counties.美国县级社会脆弱性指数与美国各县乳腺癌、结直肠癌和肺癌筛查、发病率及死亡率的关联
Front Oncol. 2024 Aug 7;14:1422475. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1422475. eCollection 2024.
5
Factors Associated With Mailed Fecal Immunochemical Test Completion in an Integrated Academic-Community Healthcare System.与综合学术-社区医疗保健系统中邮寄粪便免疫化学检测完成相关的因素。
Clin Transl Gastroenterol. 2024 Oct 1;15(10):e1. doi: 10.14309/ctg.0000000000000757.
6
Spatial Accessibility and Uptake of Pediatric COVID-19 Vaccinations by Social Vulnerability.社会脆弱性视角下的儿童 COVID-19 疫苗接种的可达性和接受度。
Pediatrics. 2024 Aug 1;154(2). doi: 10.1542/peds.2024-065938.
7
Identifying Patterns of Primary Care In-Person and Telemedicine Use in the Veterans Health Administration: A Latent Class Analysis.在退伍军人健康管理局中识别初级保健门诊和远程医疗使用的模式:潜在类别分析。
J Gen Intern Med. 2024 Sep;39(12):2241-2248. doi: 10.1007/s11606-024-08751-5. Epub 2024 Apr 15.
8
Area-Level Socioeconomic Disadvantage and Health Care Spending: A Systematic Review.区域层面的社会经济劣势与医疗保健支出:系统综述。
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Feb 5;7(2):e2356121. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.56121.
9
Updated recommendations for the Cochrane rapid review methods guidance for rapid reviews of effectiveness.Cochrane有效性快速综述方法指南的更新建议。
BMJ. 2024 Feb 6;384:e076335. doi: 10.1136/bmj-2023-076335.
10
Vulnerability and Colorectal screening during the pandemic.疫情期间的易感性与结直肠癌筛查
Prev Med Rep. 2023 Dec 21;37:102570. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2023.102570. eCollection 2024 Jan.