Crowley Christopher J, Shinder Iosif I, Moldover Michael R, Boyd Joey T, Filla B James, Johnson Aaron N
National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD 20899, United States of America.
Metrologia. 2025;62(2). doi: 10.1088/1681-7575/adac64.
Laser Doppler anemometers (LDAs) use scattered light to determine velocity components of a flowing fluid. The operating principal of LDAs is simple conceptually; however, it is impractical to trace the LDA-determined velocities to the SI by characterizing the LDA's subsystems that generate, detect, and process optical signals because these subsystems are complex and include proprietary features. To circumvent this, we calibrated the complete LDA systems utilizing an optical chopper blade as an accurate, SI-traceable velocity standard. The calibrations achieved the expanded velocity uncertainty 0.094% at a 95% confidence level. We calibrated two LDAs that differed in manufacturer, focal length (in the ratio 3.3:1), sensing volume (in the ratio 100:1), and orientation (vertical and horizontal bisectors of the LDA's crossing beams). To compare the calibrations, we measured airspeeds in NIST's wind tunnel using both LDAs. The results differed from each other by, at most, 0.2% throughout the airspeed range (0.5-30) m s.
激光多普勒风速仪(LDA)利用散射光来确定流动流体的速度分量。LDA的工作原理在概念上很简单;然而,通过对LDA中产生、检测和处理光信号的子系统进行特性描述,将LDA确定的速度追溯到国际单位制(SI)是不切实际的,因为这些子系统很复杂且包含专有特性。为了规避这一问题,我们使用光学斩波器叶片作为准确的、可追溯到SI的速度标准,对完整的LDA系统进行了校准。校准在95%的置信水平下实现了0.094%的扩展速度不确定度。我们校准了两台LDA,它们在制造商、焦距(比例为3.3:1)、传感体积(比例为100:1)和方向(LDA交叉光束的垂直和水平平分线)方面存在差异。为了比较校准结果,我们使用这两台LDA在国家标准与技术研究院(NIST)的风洞中测量了风速。在整个风速范围(0.5 - 30)m/s内,结果彼此之间的差异最大为0.2%。