Suppr超能文献

经颅直流电刺激(tDCS)治疗强迫症(OCD)患者的疗效与安全性:一项随机对照试验的系统评价与荟萃分析

Efficacy and safety of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) in patients with obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD): A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

作者信息

Moshfeghinia Reza, Najibi Amirhossein, Golabi Fahimeh, Moradi Mehrnaz, Malekpour Mahdi, Abdollahifard Saeed, Slavin Konstantin, Razmkon Ali

机构信息

Student Research Committee, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran; Research Center for Neuromodulation and Pain, 4th floor, Boghrat building, Zand Street, Shiraz, Iran; Research Center for Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.

Research Center for Neuromodulation and Pain, 4th floor, Boghrat building, Zand Street, Shiraz, Iran; Fasa Neuroscience Circle (FNC), Student Research Committee, Fasa University of Medical Sciences, Fasa, Iran.

出版信息

Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2025 Jun;173:106171. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2025.106171. Epub 2025 Apr 21.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is gaining traction for treating obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD), but its effectiveness and safety remain uncertain. A systematic review of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) will assess its clinical benefits for symptom reduction.

METHODS

Six databases-Scopus, PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane, PsycINFO, and Cochrane Central-were searched to identify relevant studies. The included studies were RCTs that assessed the effects of tDCS on OCD symptoms, as well as its impact on anxiety and depression, while also evaluating adverse events (AEs). The risk of bias (ROB) was analyzed using the ROB-2 tool. A meta-analysis was performed utilizing Stata-17 software.

RESULTS

Immediately following treatment, the analysis revealed that tDCS significantly reduced the Y-BOCS score (SMD = -0.56 [-0.87, -0.26]), anxiety scores (SMD = -1.11 [-1.85, -0.37]), and depression scores (SMD = -1.57 [-2.64, -0.50]), while increasing CGI-S scores (SMD = 0.40 [0.08, 0.72]) in OCD patients compared to the sham group. During the follow-up period (1-2 months post-treatment), tDCS continued to decrease the Y-BOCS score (SMD = -0.69 [-1.22, -0.17]), anxiety scores (SMD = -1.13 [-3.05, -0.78]), and depression scores (SMD = -2.02 [-3.00, -1.04]), but showed no effect on CGI-S scores when compared to the sham group. Additionally, the analysis indicated no significant differences in AEs between active tDCS and the sham group (OR: 1.20 [0.86, 1.68]).

CONCLUSIONS

This review suggests that tDCS may effectively alleviate OCD symptoms, along with related depression and anxiety, both acute and at follow-up, while causing minimal AEs.

摘要

背景

经颅直流电刺激(tDCS)在治疗强迫症(OCD)方面越来越受到关注,但其有效性和安全性仍不确定。一项对随机对照试验(RCT)的系统评价将评估其在减轻症状方面的临床益处。

方法

检索了六个数据库——Scopus、PubMed、科学网、考克兰图书馆、PsycINFO和考克兰中心对照试验注册库,以识别相关研究。纳入的研究为评估tDCS对OCD症状的影响及其对焦虑和抑郁的影响,同时还评估不良事件(AE)的RCT。使用ROB-2工具分析偏倚风险(ROB)。利用Stata-17软件进行荟萃分析。

结果

治疗后立即分析显示,与假刺激组相比,tDCS显著降低了OCD患者的耶鲁布朗强迫症量表(Y-BOCS)评分(标准化均数差[SMD]=-0.56[-0.87,-0.26])、焦虑评分(SMD=-1.11[-1.85,-0.37])和抑郁评分(SMD=-1.57[-2.64,-0.50]),同时提高了临床总体印象量表严重程度(CGI-S)评分(SMD=0.40[0.08,0.72])。在随访期(治疗后1-2个月),tDCS继续降低Y-BOCS评分(SMD=-0.69[-1.22,-0.17])、焦虑评分(SMD=-1.13[-3.05,-0.78])和抑郁评分(SMD=-2.02[-3.00,-1.04]),但与假刺激组相比,对CGI-S评分无影响。此外,分析表明,活性tDCS与假刺激组之间的AE无显著差异(比值比:1.20[0.86,1.68])。

结论

本综述表明,tDCS可能有效缓解OCD症状以及相关的抑郁和焦虑,无论是在急性期还是随访期,同时引起的AE最少。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验