Suppr超能文献

帕博利珠单抗联合化疗作为晚期胆管癌一线治疗的成本效益分析:来自美国和中国支付方的观点

Cost-effectiveness analysis of pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy as first-line treatment for advanced biliary tract cancer: perspectives from US and Chinese payers.

作者信息

Jiang Can, Zhou Kexun, Shu Pei

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.

Department of Cardiology, Chengdu Shang Jin Nan Fu Hospital, Chengdu, China.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2025 Apr 23;15(4):e094047. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-094047.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The KEYNOTE-966 study demonstrated that pembrolizumab combined with chemotherapy is more effective than chemotherapy alone as first-line treatment for patients with advanced biliary tract cancer (BTC). However, the cost-effectiveness of pembrolizumab combined with chemotherapy in the USA and China remains uncertain.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy compared with placebo plus chemotherapy from the perspective of US and Chinese payers.

DESIGN

Markov models with three health states were developed to simulate the process of advanced BTC. Cost data were obtained from available databases and published literature in the US scenario, and from local institutions from the China scenario. Utility values were derived from previous studies.

OUTCOME MEASURES

Primary outcomes included quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs).

RESULTS

In the US scenario, pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy increased costs by US$97,222.13, compared with chemotherapy alone, with a gain of 0.12 QALYs, resulting in an ICER of US$810 184.42 per QALY. In the China scenario, the ICER was $360 933.50 per QALY. Sensitivity analyses indicated the costs of pembrolizumab had the greatest impact on the model in both scenarios. Further analyses suggested that the optimal price of pembrolizumab in the USA would be nearly US$10.33 /mg, while a price reduction of over 90% would be required for the combined therapy to be cost-effective for patients in China.

CONCLUSION

Based on the willingness-to-pay threshold set at three times the gross domestic product per capita, pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy is not a cost-effective option for patients with advanced BTC in either the USA or China. Significant price reduction for pembrolizumab may be necessary to achieve an acceptable ICER.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT04003636; postresults.

摘要

背景

KEYNOTE-966研究表明,帕博利珠单抗联合化疗作为晚期胆管癌(BTC)患者的一线治疗方案,比单纯化疗更有效。然而,帕博利珠单抗联合化疗在美国和中国的成本效益仍不确定。

目的

本研究旨在从美国和中国医保支付方的角度,评估帕博利珠单抗联合化疗与安慰剂联合化疗相比的成本效益。

设计

建立了具有三种健康状态的马尔可夫模型,以模拟晚期BTC的病程。成本数据在美国情景下从可用数据库和已发表文献中获取,在中国情景下从当地机构获取。效用值来自先前的研究。

观察指标

主要结局包括质量调整生命年(QALY)和增量成本效益比(ICER)。

结果

在美国情景下,与单纯化疗相比,帕博利珠单抗联合化疗使成本增加97,222.13美元,QALY增加0.12,导致ICER为每QALY 810,184.42美元。在中国情景下,ICER为每QALY 360,933.50美元。敏感性分析表明,在两种情景下,帕博利珠单抗的成本对模型影响最大。进一步分析表明,帕博利珠单抗在美国的最优价格约为10.33美元/毫克,而在中国,联合治疗要对患者具有成本效益,价格需降低90%以上。

结论

基于设定为人均国内生产总值三倍的支付意愿阈值,帕博利珠单抗联合化疗对美国或中国的晚期BTC患者而言都不是具有成本效益的选择。可能需要大幅降低帕博利珠单抗的价格才能实现可接受的ICER。

试验注册号

NCT04003636;结果公布后。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4827/12020752/74a0dfe1eab7/bmjopen-15-4-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验