Dierssen-Sotos Trinidad, Gómez-Acebo Inés, Alonso-Molero Jéssica, Pérez-Gómez Beatriz, Guevara Marcela, Amiano Pilar, Castaño-Vinyals Gemma, Marcos-Delgado Alba, Mirones Mónica, Obón-Santacana Mireia, Fernández-Tardón Guillermo, Molina-Barceló Ana, Bayo Juan, Sanvisens Arantza, Fernández-Ortiz María, Fernández-Villa Tania, Espinosa Ana, Aizpurua Amaia, Ardanaz Eva, Aragonés Nuria, Kogevinas Manolis, Pollán Marina, Llorca Javier
Universidad de Cantabria, Santander, Spain.
CIBER Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP), Madrid, Spain.
Sci Rep. 2025 Apr 23;15(1):14129. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-98469-z.
Socio-economic status (SES) is related to breast cancer diagnosis and prognosis. We study if SES is related to the adequacy of the treatment according to Saint Gallen consensus in Spanish women with incident breast cancer. Breast cancer cohort was assembled from incident cases from MCC-Spain and prospective followed-up afterwards. Participants were then classified according to the Saint-Gallen consensus in three categories (In Saint-Gallen, who received therapy accorded by Saint Gallen; Over Saint-Gallen, who received some additional therapy; or Under Saint-Gallen, who did not receive the complete therapy). Association between SES and Saint-Gallen fulfilment was analyzed using multinomial logistic regression, adjusting for clinicopathological and patient-related variables. 1115 patients in stages I and II were included. Women with university education were 58% more likely to receive over Saint-Gallen therapies (RRR = 1.68; 95%CI 0.84-3.33). In the simplified SES score, women with higher SES were over Saint-Gallen 52% more than those with lower SES (RRR = 1.52; 95%CI 0.88-2.64). Women with higher SES more often received over Saint-Gallen therapies. Further analyses are needed to understand the influence of these differences on the overall survival as well as its potential unwanted side effects.
社会经济地位(SES)与乳腺癌的诊断和预后相关。我们研究在西班牙新发乳腺癌女性中,SES是否与根据圣加仑共识进行的治疗充分性相关。乳腺癌队列由西班牙MCC的新发病例组成,并在之后进行前瞻性随访。然后根据圣加仑共识将参与者分为三类(在圣加仑组,接受符合圣加仑共识的治疗;超圣加仑组,接受一些额外治疗;或低于圣加仑组,未接受完整治疗)。使用多项逻辑回归分析SES与圣加仑共识达成情况之间的关联,并对临床病理和患者相关变量进行调整。纳入了1115例I期和II期患者。受过大学教育的女性接受超圣加仑治疗的可能性高58%(相对风险比RRR = 1.68;95%置信区间CI 0.84 - 3.33)。在简化的SES评分中,SES较高的女性接受超圣加仑治疗的比例比SES较低的女性高52%(RRR = 1.52;95%CI 0.88 - 2.64)。SES较高的女性更常接受超圣加仑治疗。需要进一步分析以了解这些差异对总生存的影响及其潜在的不良副作用。