Tidus Kaela M, Williford Amanda P
Center for Advanced Study of Teaching and Learning, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA.
Infant Ment Health J. 2025 Apr 23. doi: 10.1002/imhj.70014.
This study explores readiness for change (RFC) in infant and early childhood education through the perspectives of infant and early childhood mental health (IECMH) consultants and social-emotional (SEL) coaches. Specifically, this research examines how these professionals perceive educators' RFC, identify barriers and facilitators to engagement, and implement strategies to tailor intervention efforts based on educators' individual levels of readiness. Semi-structured qualitative interviews were conducted with 13 IECMH consultants and SEL coaches in the southeastern United States, with demographic data indicating a predominantly female sample, diverse in racial backgrounds and professional experience. Thematic analysis identified key themes, including the importance of individualized approaches, supportive relationships, and the influence of both structural and internal barriers on educators' RFC. Findings underscore the need for validated measures of RFC and suggest that enhancing RFC may strengthen the impact of IECMHC and practice-based coaching interventions. These insights contribute to a deeper understanding of the complexities involved in fostering RFC and offer practical implications for practitioners, researchers, and policymakers.
本研究通过婴幼儿心理健康(IECMH)顾问和社会情感(SEL)教练的视角,探讨婴幼儿教育中的变革准备度(RFC)。具体而言,本研究考察了这些专业人员如何看待教育工作者的变革准备度,确定参与的障碍和促进因素,并根据教育工作者的个人准备水平实施定制干预措施的策略。对美国东南部的13名IECMH顾问和SEL教练进行了半结构化定性访谈,人口统计数据显示样本以女性为主,种族背景和专业经验多样。主题分析确定了关键主题,包括个性化方法的重要性、支持性的关系以及结构和内部障碍对教育工作者变革准备度的影响。研究结果强调了对变革准备度进行有效测量的必要性,并表明提高变革准备度可能会增强婴幼儿心理健康咨询和基于实践的教练干预的效果。这些见解有助于更深入地理解培养变革准备度所涉及的复杂性,并为从业者、研究人员和政策制定者提供实际启示。