• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

口腔癌手术治疗患者的气道管理

Airway management in patients with surgical treatment of oral cavity carcinoma.

作者信息

Sturm Patrick, Gaessler Holger, Weiß Christel, Schramm Alexander, Wilde Frank, Ebeling Marcel, Sakkas Andreas

机构信息

Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University Hospital Ulm, Ulm, Germany.

Department of Anaesthesiology, Intensive Care Medicine, Emergency Medicine and Pain Therapy, Federal Armed Forces Hospital Ulm, Ulm, Germany.

出版信息

BMC Anesthesiol. 2025 Apr 23;25(1):195. doi: 10.1186/s12871-025-03048-4.

DOI:10.1186/s12871-025-03048-4
PMID:40269692
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12016132/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Local tumor-related anatomical changes can complicate the anesthetic airway management of patients with carcinoma of the oral cavity. The aim of this study was to investigate whether there are predictive factors for the occurrence of a difficult airway in this patient cohort and whether a difficult airway influences postoperative outcome. In addition, the influence of an intraoperative tracheostomy on postoperative outcome was to be analyzed.

METHODS

The treatment records of 201 patients with oral cavity carcinoma who underwent surgery between 2012 and 2023 in a single center were retrospectively analyzed. The definition of difficult airway corresponded to the current S1 guideline of the German Society of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine from 2015. An association between possible predictive factors and a difficult airway was investigated. The influence of BMI, Mallampati score and Cormack/Lehane score on the number of intubation attempts was analyzed separately. Furthermore, the influence of a difficult airway on the duration of intubation and the duration of the postoperative inpatient stay as well as the postoperative ICU stay was investigated. In addition, the association between an intraoperative tracheostomy and the duration of intubation as well as the duration of the postoperative inpatient stay was analyzed.

RESULTS

Difficult airway occurred in 15 patients (7,5%) and 136 (68%) underwent intraoperative tracheostomy. An indirect laryngoscopy was used in advance in 32,8% of the total patients and 45,4% of the patients undergoing revision surgery. Among the investigated variables, no predictive factors for a difficult airway could be identified. Regarding the number of intubation attempts required, a higher BMI and Mallampati score did not lead to increased number of intubation attempts; however, patients with a Cormack/Lehane score of 3 were significantly more likely to require 2 attempts than patients with a score of 1 or 2 (p = 0.0225). The success rate of first intubation attempt was 78% with videolaryngoscopy, compared to 95,5% when direct laryngoscopy was used (p = 0,0008). A difficult airway did not lead to prolonged postoperative ICU stay and total hospitalisation length. Patients with an intraoperative tracheostomy had a significantly longer mechanical ventilation and total hospitalisation length than patients without (p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSION

Within the limitations of this study, no patient-specific predictors for a difficult airway were identified in patients with oral cavity carcinoma. Videolaryngoscopy in advance did not increase the success rate of the first intubation attempt compared to direct laryngoscopy. Despite this, videolaryngoscopy may be a preferable approach in this population, especially in patients undergoing revision surgeries. The results highlight the importance of a careful preoperative assessment with clearly defined criteria for a difficult airway and appropriate anaesthesiological preparation to avoid complications during intubation.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Ethics committee of the University of Ulm, approval reference: 115/23, approval date: 08.05.2023.

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/508e/12016132/a2e60588cf2b/12871_2025_3048_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/508e/12016132/a2e60588cf2b/12871_2025_3048_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/508e/12016132/a2e60588cf2b/12871_2025_3048_Fig1_HTML.jpg
摘要

背景

局部肿瘤相关的解剖结构改变会使口腔癌患者的气道麻醉管理变得复杂。本研究的目的是调查该患者群体中是否存在困难气道发生的预测因素,以及困难气道是否会影响术后结局。此外,还将分析术中气管切开术对术后结局的影响。

方法

回顾性分析了2012年至2023年在单中心接受手术的201例口腔癌患者的治疗记录。困难气道的定义符合德国麻醉与重症医学学会2015年的现行S1指南。研究了可能的预测因素与困难气道之间的关联。分别分析了体重指数(BMI)、马兰帕蒂评分和科马克/莱汉内评分对插管尝试次数的影响。此外,还研究了困难气道对插管持续时间、术后住院时间以及术后重症监护病房(ICU)住院时间的影响。另外,分析了术中气管切开术与插管持续时间以及术后住院时间之间的关联。

结果

15例患者(7.5%)出现困难气道,136例(68%)接受了术中气管切开术。32.8%的患者和45.4%的再次手术患者提前进行了间接喉镜检查。在所研究的变量中,未发现困难气道的预测因素。关于所需的插管尝试次数,较高的BMI和马兰帕蒂评分并未导致插管尝试次数增加;然而,科马克/莱汉内评分为3分的患者比评分为1分或2分的患者需要进行2次尝试的可能性显著更高(p = 0.0225)。视频喉镜检查首次插管尝试的成功率为78%,而直接喉镜检查时为95.5%(p = 0.0008)。困难气道并未导致术后ICU住院时间和总住院时间延长。接受术中气管切开术的患者机械通气时间和总住院时间显著长于未接受气管切开术的患者(p < 0.0001)。

结论

在本研究的局限性内,未在口腔癌患者中确定困难气道的患者特异性预测因素。与直接喉镜检查相比,提前进行视频喉镜检查并未提高首次插管尝试的成功率。尽管如此,视频喉镜检查可能是该人群中更可取的方法,尤其是在再次手术的患者中。结果强调了进行仔细的术前评估以及制定明确的困难气道标准和适当的麻醉准备以避免插管期间并发症的重要性。

试验注册

乌尔姆大学伦理委员会,批准编号:115/23,批准日期:2023年5月8日。

相似文献

1
Airway management in patients with surgical treatment of oral cavity carcinoma.口腔癌手术治疗患者的气道管理
BMC Anesthesiol. 2025 Apr 23;25(1):195. doi: 10.1186/s12871-025-03048-4.
2
The evaluation of maximum condyle-tragus distance can predict difficult airway management without exposing upper respiratory tract; a prospective observational study.最大髁突-耳垂距离评估可预测无需暴露上呼吸道的困难气道管理;一项前瞻性观察研究。
BMC Anesthesiol. 2021 Jan 25;21(1):28. doi: 10.1186/s12871-021-01253-5.
3
C-MAC videolaryngoscope compared with direct laryngoscopy for rapid sequence intubation in an emergency department: A randomised clinical trial.急诊室中C-MAC视频喉镜与直接喉镜用于快速顺序插管的比较:一项随机临床试验。
Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2016 Dec;33(12):943-948. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0000000000000525.
4
Videolaryngoscopy versus direct laryngoscopy for adults undergoing tracheal intubation.视频喉镜与直接喉镜用于成人气管插管。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Apr 4;4(4):CD011136. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011136.pub3.
5
Airway Management in Microvascular Reconstruction of the Oral Cavity: Is Immediate Extubation Possible?口腔微血管重建中的气道管理:能否立即拔管?
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2025 Feb;83(2):222-230. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2024.10.014. Epub 2024 Oct 31.
6
ASSESSMENT OF STANDARD ANTHROPOMETRIC AIRWAY CHARACTERISTICS RELEVANT FOR AIRWAY MANAGEMENT OF PATIENTS WITH OBSTRUCTIVE SLEEP APNEA SYNDROME DURING SLEEP BREATHING DISORDER SURGERY: A RETROSPECTIVE, SINGLE CENTER STUDY.评估阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停综合征患者睡眠呼吸障碍手术中气道管理相关的标准人体测量气道特征:一项回顾性、单中心研究。
Acta Clin Croat. 2023 Apr;62(Suppl1):21-28. doi: 10.20471/acc.2023.62.s1.02.
7
Videolaryngoscopy versus direct laryngoscopy for tracheal intubation in children (excluding neonates).儿童(不包括新生儿)气管插管时视频喉镜与直接喉镜的比较。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 May 24;5(5):CD011413. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011413.pub2.
8
Comparative effectiveness of the C-MAC video laryngoscope versus direct laryngoscopy in the setting of the predicted difficult airway.预测困难气道中 C-MAC 视频喉镜与直接喉镜的比较效果。
Anesthesiology. 2012 Mar;116(3):629-36. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e318246ea34.
9
Videolaryngoscopy versus direct laryngoscopy for nasotracheal intubation: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.视频喉镜与直接喉镜用于经鼻气管插管的比较:系统评价和随机对照试验的荟萃分析。
J Clin Anesth. 2019 Feb;52:6-16. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2018.08.029. Epub 2018 Aug 25.
10
A data review of airway management in patients with oral cavity or oropharyngeal cancer: a single-institution experience.口腔或口咽癌患者气道管理的数据回顾:单机构经验。
BMC Anesthesiol. 2019 Jun 1;19(1):92. doi: 10.1186/s12871-019-0770-2.

本文引用的文献

1
Video Laryngoscopy vs Direct Laryngoscopy for Endotracheal Intubation in the Operating Room: A Cluster Randomized Clinical Trial.视频喉镜与直接喉镜在手术室经口气管插管的比较:一项整群随机临床试验。
JAMA. 2024 Apr 16;331(15):1279-1286. doi: 10.1001/jama.2024.0762.
2
Prevalence and risk factors of difficult mask ventilation: A systematic review and meta-analysis.困难面罩通气的患病率和危险因素:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Clin Anesth. 2023 Nov;90:111197. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2023.111197. Epub 2023 Jul 4.
3
Video versus Direct Laryngoscopy for Tracheal Intubation of Critically Ill Adults.
视频喉镜与直接喉镜在危重症成人气管插管中的比较。
N Engl J Med. 2023 Aug 3;389(5):418-429. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2301601. Epub 2023 Jun 16.
4
A multicentre randomised controlled trial of the McGrath™ Mac videolaryngoscope versus conventional laryngoscopy.一项 McGrath™ Mac 视频喉镜与传统喉镜的多中心随机对照试验。
Anaesthesia. 2023 Jun;78(6):722-729. doi: 10.1111/anae.15985. Epub 2023 Mar 16.
5
A systematic review and meta-analysis of risk factors for intensive care unit acquired weakness.重症监护病房获得性肌无力的危险因素的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2022 Oct 28;101(43):e31405. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000031405.
6
PREDICTION OF DIFFICULT INTUBATION BY USING UPPER LIP BITE, THYROMENTAL DISTANCE AND MALLAMPATI SCORE IN COMPARISON TO CORMACK AND LEHANE CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM.通过比较上唇咬、甲状软骨切迹距离和 Mallampati 评分与 Cormack 和 Lehane 分类系统,预测困难插管。
Wiad Lek. 2021;74(9 pt 2):2305-2314.
7
Identification of patients for a delayed extubation strategy versus elective tracheostomy for postoperative airway management in major oral cancer surgery: A prospective observational study in seven hundred and twenty patients.在大型口腔癌手术后的气道管理中,比较延迟拔管策略与选择性气管切开术用于患者的选择:一项七百二十例患者前瞻性观察研究。
Oral Oncol. 2021 Oct;121:105502. doi: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2021.105502. Epub 2021 Aug 24.
8
Management of the Difficult Airway.困难气道的管理
N Engl J Med. 2021 May 13;384(19):1836-1847. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra1916801.
9
Patient and surgery factors associated with the incidence of failed and difficult intubation.与插管失败和困难相关的患者和手术因素。
Anaesthesia. 2020 Jun;75(6):756-766. doi: 10.1111/anae.14997. Epub 2020 Mar 31.
10
A study of factors related to patients' length of stay using data mining techniques in a general hospital in southern Iran.利用数据挖掘技术对伊朗南部一家综合医院患者住院时间相关因素的研究。
Health Inf Sci Syst. 2020 Feb 1;8(1):9. doi: 10.1007/s13755-020-0099-8. eCollection 2020 Dec.