Rodrigues-Gomes Ricardo Miguel, Prieto Campo Ángela, Martinez Rolán Rosa, Gelabert-González Miguel
Facultade de Medicina, Santiago de Compostela University, Santiago de Compostela, Spain.
Galicia Sur Health Research Institute (IIS Galicia Sur), SERGAS-UVIGO, Vigo, Spain.
Crit Care. 2025 Apr 23;29(1):159. doi: 10.1186/s13054-025-05405-8.
Some studies refer to the increase in intracranial pressure (ICP) with chest physiotherapy techniques but without any randomized controlled trials that evaluate the safety of the manual rapid chest compression technique in patients with severe acute brain injuries on invasive mechanical ventilation. Our research question examines whether intracranial and cerebral perfusion pressures significantly change during rapid chest compression technique.
A prospective, randomized, single-blinded controlled trial of acute neurocritical patients under mechanical ventilation was performed. The intervention group was subjected to rapid chest compression, and the control group received mechanical passive inferior limbs mobilization. The outcomes were intracranial pressure, cerebral perfusion pressure, blood partial pressure of oxygen and carbon dioxide, and inspiratory and expiratory peak flows.
Between May 2021 and December 2023, 50 patients (aged 56.3 years), 66% females, were randomized into two groups (25 controls and 25 interventions). The ICP and cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP) did not significantly differ between the groups at any of the studied times. Intragroup analysis revealed significant decreases in the ICP and CPP in the intervention group, with posterior recovery in both groups. The CPP significantly decreased in the control group but did not reach the preintervention values at the last measurement time. PaCO was significantly lower in the intervention group than in the control group at the end of the study.
The rapid chest compression technique did not increase the ICP during its application or even 30 min after it. The ICP showed a slight significant decrease during the application of the rapid chest compression technique but reached the previous values in the posterior 30 min. CPP had a similar behavior but did not completely recover in both groups.
NCT03609866. Registered on 08/01/2018.
一些研究提到胸部物理治疗技术会使颅内压(ICP)升高,但尚无随机对照试验评估在有创机械通气的重症急性脑损伤患者中手动快速胸部按压技术的安全性。我们的研究问题是探究快速胸部按压技术过程中颅内压和脑灌注压是否会发生显著变化。
对接受机械通气的急性神经重症患者进行了一项前瞻性、随机、单盲对照试验。干预组接受快速胸部按压,对照组接受机械性被动下肢活动。观察指标包括颅内压、脑灌注压、血氧和二氧化碳分压以及吸气和呼气峰值流速。
在2021年5月至2023年12月期间,50例患者(年龄56.3岁),66%为女性,被随机分为两组(25例对照组和25例干预组)。在任何研究时间点,两组之间的颅内压和脑灌注压(CPP)均无显著差异。组内分析显示,干预组的颅内压和CPP显著降低,两组随后均有所恢复。对照组的CPP显著降低,但在最后测量时间未恢复到干预前的值。在研究结束时,干预组的动脉血二氧化碳分压(PaCO)显著低于对照组。
快速胸部按压技术在应用过程中甚至应用后30分钟内均未使颅内压升高。在快速胸部按压技术应用期间,颅内压略有显著下降,但在随后的30分钟内恢复到先前值。CPP有类似表现,但两组均未完全恢复。
NCT03609866。于2018年1月8日注册。