Feng Huan, Li YanJing, Wang QingChuan, Tao Ye, Wang ZhiHua
College of Physical Education, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
College of Physical Education, Jiangxi Normal University, Nanchang, China.
Front Public Health. 2025 Apr 9;13:1582923. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1582923. eCollection 2025.
To systematically evaluate the comparative effectiveness of traditional Chinese exercises (TCEs) and other interventions for managing anxiety and depression in adults using a network meta-analysis approach.
Systematic review and network meta-analysis.
Literature search was conducted in Embase, PubMed, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library from inception to December 31, 2024. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) involving TCEs for adults with anxiety or depression were included. Two reviewers independently screened studies, extracted data, and assessed risk of bias using the ROB2 tool. Bayesian network meta-analyses were performed to compare the effectiveness of interventions. The surface under the cumulative ranking area (SUCRA) was used to rank the interventions.
Embase, PubMed, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library.
RCTs involving adults aged 18 years and older, intervention groups engaging in TCEs, comparator groups with no intervention, routine treatment, or distinct interventions, reported outcomes related to anxiety or depression assessed using validated tools, and studies published in English or Chinese.
A total of 82 RCTs were included, with 4,501 participants. For anxiety, Liu Zi Jue (SUCRA = 99.5%), Tai Chi (SUCRA = 87.6%), and CBT (SUCRA = 75.3%) were the most effective interventions. For depression, Tai Chi (SUCRA = 95.5%), Yijinjing (SUCRA = 89.2%), and CBT (SUCRA = 83.6%) ranked as the most effective. TCEs demonstrated comparable or superior efficacy to well-established interventions like CBT. The study also found that TCEs have high adherence rates, low costs, and the potential for large-scale promotion and value.
This systematic review and network meta-analysis provides evidence for the efficacy of TCEs, particularly Tai Chi, Liu Zi Jue, and Yijinjing, in managing anxiety and depression in adults. Despite limitations such as heterogeneity in intervention protocols and study populations, the findings suggest that these exercises offer therapeutic benefits and may serve as accessible, cost-effective, and culturally-relevant treatment options. Further research is needed to establish optimal dosages, assess long-term effects, and evaluate generalizability across diverse contexts.
CRD42025637146.
采用网状Meta分析方法,系统评价传统中医功法(TCEs)与其他干预措施对成人焦虑和抑郁的比较疗效。
系统评价和网状Meta分析。
在Embase、PubMed、Web of Science和Cochrane图书馆中进行文献检索,检索时间从建库至2024年12月31日。纳入涉及TCEs治疗成人焦虑或抑郁的随机对照试验(RCTs)。两名研究者独立筛选研究、提取数据,并使用ROB2工具评估偏倚风险。进行贝叶斯网状Meta分析以比较干预措施的疗效。使用累积排序曲线下面积(SUCRA)对干预措施进行排序。
Embase、PubMed、Web of Science和Cochrane图书馆。
涉及18岁及以上成年人的RCTs,干预组进行TCEs,对照组为无干预、常规治疗或不同的干预措施,报告使用经过验证的工具评估的与焦虑或抑郁相关的结局,以及以英文或中文发表的研究。
共纳入82项RCTs,4501名参与者。对于焦虑,六字诀(SUCRA = 99.5%)、太极拳(SUCRA = 87.6%)和认知行为疗法(CBT,SUCRA = 75.3%)是最有效的干预措施。对于抑郁,太极拳(SUCRA = 95.5%)、易筋经(SUCRA = 89.2%)和CBT(SUCRA = 83.6%)排名最有效。TCEs显示出与CBT等成熟干预措施相当或更优的疗效。该研究还发现,TCEs具有高依从率、低成本以及大规模推广和价值潜力。
这项系统评价和网状Meta分析为TCEs,特别是太极拳、六字诀和易筋经在成人焦虑和抑郁管理中的疗效提供了证据。尽管存在干预方案和研究人群异质性等局限性,但研究结果表明这些功法具有治疗益处,可能是易于获得、具有成本效益且与文化相关的治疗选择。需要进一步研究以确定最佳剂量、评估长期效果并评估在不同背景下的可推广性。
CRD42025637146。