Tuffrey M, Falder P, Taylor-Robinson D
Br J Exp Pathol. 1985 Aug;66(4):427-33.
Groups of progesterone-treated female CBA/nu mice were adoptively transferred with immune spleen cells or pooled antisera from congenic immunocompetent CBA donors that had been infected with a 'fast', human strain (SA-2f) of Chlamydia trachomatis. The spleen cells were given either intravenously (6.3 X 10(7) cells) or intraperitoneally (9.5 X 10(7) cells), and the antiserum (antibody titre 1:4096) was given intravenously. Strain SA-2f was introduced into the uterine cavity of these mice approximately 3 h after cell or antiserum transfer; antiserum was given also at intervals up to 23 days later. Untreated mice serving as controls were inoculated with chlamydiae in the same way. Subsequent recovery of chlamydiae from mice in the various groups indicated that transfer of cells or antiserum had not abrogated the chlamydial infections, despite high titres of chlamydial IgG antibody in the sera of all the recipient mice. These results confirm our earlier findings but are unlike those of some other investigators working with different mouse model systems. It seems that there are differences between systemic/respiratory immune mechanisms and those which operate locally in the uterus, which may be regarded as an immunologically privileged site.
用孕酮处理过的雌性CBA/nu小鼠被分成几组,分别接受来自同基因免疫活性CBA供体的免疫脾细胞或混合抗血清,这些供体曾感染过沙眼衣原体的一种“快速”人类菌株(SA-2f)。脾细胞通过静脉注射(6.3×10⁷个细胞)或腹腔注射(9.5×10⁷个细胞),抗血清(抗体效价为1:4096)则通过静脉注射。在细胞或抗血清转移后约3小时,将SA-2f菌株引入这些小鼠的子宫腔;抗血清在之后长达23天的时间里也会间隔给予。作为对照的未处理小鼠以相同方式接种衣原体。随后从各组小鼠中回收衣原体的情况表明,尽管所有受体小鼠血清中衣原体IgG抗体效价很高,但细胞或抗血清的转移并未消除衣原体感染。这些结果证实了我们早期的发现,但与其他一些使用不同小鼠模型系统的研究者的结果不同。似乎全身/呼吸道免疫机制与子宫局部起作用的免疫机制之间存在差异,子宫可被视为一个免疫特惠部位。