Khan Abdullah, Raskin Daniel, Partovi Sasan, Kirksey Lee
Department of Vascular Surgery, Heart Vascular and Thoracic Institute, Cleveland Clinic, 9500 Euclid Ave, F30, Cleveland, OH, 44195, USA.
Department of Interventional Radiology, Imaging Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2025 Apr 24. doi: 10.1007/s10554-025-03356-3.
This review explores a range of imaging techniques used in the pre-surgical planning of vascular access, including duplex ultrasound (DUS), digital subtraction angiography (DSA), digital subtraction venography (DSV), CO2 Venography, magnetic resonance angiography (MRA), computed tomography angiography (CTA), and Intravascular ultrasound (IVUS). For each modality, we analyze its technical background, applications, advantages and disadvantages, and comparisons with alternative imaging options. DUS is the most widely used imaging modality in pre-surgical planning due to its low cost, non-invasiveness, absence of ionizing radiation and nephrotoxic contrast agents, and comparable accuracy in pre-access mapping with other methods. DSA and DSV have high sensitivity and specificity to visualize the arterial and venous system and are recommended when central vascular stenosis is suspected, or a simultaneous intervention is anticipated. However, their use is limited due to exposure to contrast agents and ionizing radiation. CO2-based contrast agents provide an alternative for end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients to preserve residual renal function. MRA provides a noninvasive option with no radiation exposure and superior image resolution, yet the high cost and limited availability restrict their widespread clinical use. CTA, with its short acquisition time and high-resolution imaging, is a vital modality in intricate cases. However, radiation and contrast exposure can pose challenges in this patient population. The newer IVUS modality has a superior ability to central venous outflow obstruction compared to DSA and provides more information regarding vascular geometry and anatomy. Each imaging modality has its unique advantages and disadvantages in this patient cohort. The decision to use a particular imaging must be made on a case-to-case basis. However, following KDOQI guidelines, a combination of a patient's medical history, physical examination, and DUS is a widely accepted standard practice in pre-surgical vascular access planning, with other imaging modalities reserved for selected patients.
本综述探讨了一系列用于血管通路术前规划的成像技术,包括双功超声(DUS)、数字减影血管造影(DSA)、数字减影静脉造影(DSV)、二氧化碳静脉造影、磁共振血管造影(MRA)、计算机断层血管造影(CTA)和血管内超声(IVUS)。对于每种成像方式,我们分析了其技术背景、应用、优缺点以及与其他成像选项的比较。由于成本低、无创、无电离辐射和肾毒性造影剂,且在通路术前映射方面与其他方法具有相当的准确性,DUS是术前规划中使用最广泛的成像方式。DSA和DSV对可视化动脉和静脉系统具有高灵敏度和特异性,当怀疑有中心血管狭窄或预期同时进行干预时推荐使用。然而,由于接触造影剂和电离辐射,其应用受到限制。基于二氧化碳的造影剂为终末期肾病(ESRD)患者提供了一种保留残余肾功能的替代方法。MRA提供了一种无辐射暴露且图像分辨率优越的无创选择,但高成本和可用性有限限制了其在临床中的广泛应用。CTA采集时间短且成像分辨率高,在复杂病例中是一种重要的成像方式。然而,辐射和造影剂暴露可能给这类患者带来挑战。与DSA相比,更新的IVUS成像方式在诊断中心静脉流出道梗阻方面具有更强的能力,并能提供更多关于血管几何形状和解剖结构的信息。在这一患者群体中,每种成像方式都有其独特的优缺点。必须根据具体情况决定使用哪种特定的成像方式。然而,遵循美国肾脏病改善全球结果(KDOQI)指南,结合患者病史、体格检查和DUS是术前血管通路规划中广泛接受的标准做法,其他成像方式则用于特定患者。