Olomi Gaudensia A, Manongi Rachel, Makasi Charles E, Woodworth Simon, Mlay Pendo, Yeates Karen, West Nicola, Hirst Jane E, Mahande Michael J, Mmbaga Blandina T, Cansdale Lottie G, Khashan Ali S
School of Medicine, KCMC University, Moshi, Tanzania.
Health Department, Kilimanjaro Regional Adminstrative Secretary's Office, Moshi, Tanzania.
PLoS One. 2025 Apr 24;20(4):e0319510. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0319510. eCollection 2025.
mobile Health (mHealth) refers to use of mobile wireless technologies for health. The potential for mHealth to enhance healthcare delivery is supported by near-universal availability of mobile phones and their expanding coverage in low- and middle-income countries. This systematic review analyses the available evidence on mHealth clinical decision-making tools in maternal and perinatal health, and whether they lead to improved maternal and perinatal health outcomes in Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA).
Eligibility criteria: Studies conducted in SSA describing mHealth tools piloted or used for clinical decision-making in maternal or perinatal healthcare. Exclusion criteria included mHealth tools used outside of maternal and perinatal healthcare, publications lacking sufficient detail (where information couldn't be obtained through contacting authors), articles where tools were used on a laptop or desktop computer, and articles not published in English. Data sources: PubMed, CINAHL, EMBASE, Global Health, and Web of Science were searched for relevant articles following a predetermined search strategy with no date restrictions. A limited grey literature search was conducted. Risk of bias: We assessed the quality of included studies using the Cochrane Risk of bias 2 tool, Newcastle- Ottawa scale and COREQ. This comprehensive approach ensured a rigorous evaluation of bias and validity in our systematic review. Data extraction and synthesis: Two independent reviewers screened articles and extracted data.
1119 records were screened, and 36 articles met the inclusion criteria. Fifteen mHealth tools were identified across 11 SSA countries.
mHealth tools for clinical decision-making in maternal and perinatal care were found to be feasible, usable, and acceptable. They demonstrated adequate user satisfaction, and some demonstrated improvement of pregnancy outcomes. However, technologies lack scalability, with only one scaled up nationally, and few tools interacted with existing health information systems or had plans for sustainability. This review will help establish best practice for developing and scaling up mHealth clinical decision-making tools, helping to improve maternal and perinatal healthcare in SSA.
移动健康(mHealth)是指利用移动无线技术促进健康。手机几乎无处不在,且在低收入和中等收入国家的覆盖范围不断扩大,这为移动健康改善医疗服务提供了潜力。本系统评价分析了移动健康临床决策工具在孕产妇和围产期健康方面的现有证据,以及这些工具是否能改善撒哈拉以南非洲(SSA)地区的孕产妇和围产期健康结局。
纳入标准:在撒哈拉以南非洲地区开展的描述用于孕产妇或围产期医疗临床决策的移动健康工具试点或应用情况的研究。排除标准包括:在孕产妇和围产期医疗之外使用的移动健康工具、缺乏足够细节的出版物(无法通过联系作者获取信息)、在笔记本电脑或台式计算机上使用工具的文章以及非英文发表的文章。数据来源:按照预定检索策略,在PubMed、CINAHL、EMBASE、Global Health和Web of Science中检索相关文章,无日期限制。进行了有限的灰色文献检索。偏倚风险:我们使用Cochrane偏倚风险2工具、纽卡斯尔-渥太华量表和COREQ评估纳入研究的质量。这种综合方法确保了在我们的系统评价中对偏倚和有效性进行严格评估。数据提取与综合:两名独立评审员筛选文章并提取数据。
共筛选1119条记录,36篇文章符合纳入标准。在11个撒哈拉以南非洲国家共识别出15种移动健康工具。
发现用于孕产妇和围产期护理临床决策的移动健康工具是可行、可用且可接受的。它们显示出足够的用户满意度,一些工具还显示出妊娠结局有所改善。然而,这些技术缺乏可扩展性,只有一项在全国范围内扩大了规模,很少有工具与现有的健康信息系统交互或有可持续发展计划。本综述将有助于确立开发和扩大移动健康临床决策工具的最佳实践,有助于改善撒哈拉以南非洲地区的孕产妇和围产期医疗服务。