Mathura Pamela, Grasdal Mark, Marini Sandra, Podder Mohua, Kassam Narmin
University of Alberta, Department of Medicine, Edmonton, AB, Canada.
Alberta Health Services, Edmonton, AB, Canada.
J Gen Intern Med. 2025 Apr 24. doi: 10.1007/s11606-025-09513-7.
Overuse of hospital laboratory testing has been identified as a priority for quality improvement (QI). A multifaceted initiative to reduce blood urea nitrogen (BUN) ordering was implemented in hospitals across one Canadian province, preceded by either a system-focused (SF) [electronic medical record (EMR)], person-focused (PF) [performance audit and education], or no intervention.
The purpose of this study was to demonstrate the impact of sequencing and combining interventions on Medicine physician BUN test ordering practice beyond a single hospital context.
An interrupted time series with segmented regression analysis was completed. The total monthly BUN count for six hospital Medicine programs located in three different health zones in Alberta for a period of 6 and 7 years were grouped into EMR hospitals (n = 3) and non-EMR hospitals (n = 3) post-QI initiative participation.
Monthly BUN test order count.
Monthly BUN test ordering for each hospital medicine program resulted in a cumulative reduction of 51 to 95%, respectively. The highest reduction (95%, slope p < 0.001) occurred with the intervention sequence of PF followed by SF, with EMR implementation. A similar reduction (93%, slope p = 0.095) was observed when PF and SF were implemented concurrently, followed by an additional PF intervention. Hospitals with EMR implementation showed less data variability month-to-month compared to non-EMR hospitals. Lower reductions occurred with PF followed by another PF intervention (57%, slope p = 0.33) and a single PF intervention without follow-up (51%, slope p = 0.62).
Reviewing total monthly BUN ordering over several years revealed that no intervention sequence or combination was similar; however, all (urban and rural) hospitals had continued reductions. An intervention applying the sequence of PF, SF, with EMR implementation while incorporating other influential factors is essential for sustained behavioral change. Effective implementation may require consideration of hospital workflows, practitioner norms, costs, and policy changes for broader adaptability.
医院实验室检测的过度使用已被确定为质量改进(QI)的一个重点。在加拿大的一个省份,多家医院实施了一项多方面的举措来减少血尿素氮(BUN)检测的开具,在此之前分别进行了以系统为重点(SF)[电子病历(EMR)]、以人员为重点(PF)[绩效审计和教育]或不进行干预。
本研究的目的是证明在单一医院背景之外,干预措施的排序和组合对内科医生BUN检测开具行为的影响。
完成了一项带有分段回归分析的中断时间序列研究。在质量改进举措实施后,将位于艾伯塔省三个不同健康区域的六家医院内科项目在6年和7年期间的每月BUN检测总数,分为实施EMR的医院(n = 3)和未实施EMR的医院(n = 3)。
每月BUN检测开具数量。
每个医院内科项目的每月BUN检测开具数量分别累计减少了51%至95%。干预措施顺序为PF后接SF并实施EMR时,减少幅度最大(95%,斜率p < 0.001)。当PF和SF同时实施,随后再进行一次PF干预时,观察到类似的减少幅度(93%,斜率p = 0.095)。与未实施EMR的医院相比,实施EMR的医院每月的数据变异性较小。PF后接另一项PF干预时减少幅度较小(57%,斜率p = 0.33),而单独进行一次PF干预且无后续措施时减少幅度最小(51%,斜率p = 0.62)。
对数年的每月BUN检测开具总量进行审查发现,没有一种干预措施顺序或组合是相似的;然而,所有(城市和农村)医院的开具量都持续减少。采用PF、SF顺序并实施EMR,同时纳入其他影响因素的干预措施对于持续的行为改变至关重要。有效的实施可能需要考虑医院工作流程、从业者规范、成本和政策变化,以实现更广泛的适应性。