Suppr超能文献

多方面干预措施与内科护理人员开具不必要实验室检查医嘱之间的关联。

Association of a Multifaceted Intervention With Ordering of Unnecessary Laboratory Tests Among Caregivers in Internal Medicine Departments.

机构信息

Section of Acute Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

Department of Clinical Chemistry and Hematology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands.

出版信息

JAMA Netw Open. 2019 Jul 3;2(7):e197577. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.7577.

Abstract

IMPORTANCE

Inappropriate use of laboratory testing is a challenging problem. Estimated overuse rates of approximately 20% have been reported. Effective, sustainable solutions to stimulate optimal use are needed.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the association of a multifaceted intervention with laboratory test volume.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: A before-after quality improvement study was performed between August 1, 2016, and April 30, 2018, in the internal medicine departments of 4 teaching hospitals in the Netherlands. Data on laboratory order volumes from 19 comparable hospitals were used as controls. The participants were clinicians ordering laboratory tests.

INTERVENTIONS

The intervention included creating awareness through education and feedback, intensified supervision of residents, and changes in order entry systems. Interventions were performed by local project teams and guided by a central project team during a 6-month period. Sustainability was investigated during an 8-month follow-up period.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

The primary outcome was the change in slope for laboratory test volume. Secondary outcomes were change in slope for laboratory expenditure, order volumes and expenditure for other diagnostic procedures, and clinical outcomes. Data were collected on duration of hospital stay, rate of repeated outpatient visits, 30-day readmission rate, and rate of unexpected prolonged duration of hospital stay for patients admitted for pneumonia.

RESULTS

The numbers of internists and residents ordering tests in hospitals 1 to 4 were 16 and 30, 18 and 20, 13 and 17, and 21 and 60, respectively. Statistically significant changes in slope for laboratory test volume per patient contact were found at hospital 1 (change in slope, -1.55; 95% CI, -1.98 to -1.11; P < .001), hospital 3 (change in slope, -0.74; 95% CI, -1.42 to -0.07; P = .03), and hospital 4 (change in slope, -2.18; 95% CI, -3.27 to -1.08; P < .001). At hospital 2, the change in slope was not statistically significant (-0.34; 95% CI, -2.27 to 1.58; P = .73). Laboratory test volume per patient contact decreased by 11.4%, whereas the volume increased by 2.4% in 19 comparable hospitals. Statistically significant changes in slopes for laboratory costs and volumes and costs for other diagnostic procedures were also observed. Clinical outcomes were not associated with negative changes. Important facilitators were education, continuous attention for overuse, feedback, and residents' involvement. Important barriers were difficulties in data retrieval, difficulty in incorporation of principles in daily practice, and high resident turnover.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

A set of interventions aimed at changing caregivers' mindset was associated with a reduction in the laboratory test volume in all departments, whereas the volume increased in comparable hospitals in the Netherlands. This study provides a framework for nationwide implementation of interventions to reduce unnecessary laboratory testing.

摘要

重要性

实验室检测的不当使用是一个具有挑战性的问题。据估计,大约有 20%的检测被过度使用。需要有效的、可持续的解决方案来刺激最佳的使用。

目的

确定多方面干预与实验室检测量的关联。

设计、设置和参与者:这是一项在 2016 年 8 月 1 日至 2018 年 4 月 30 日期间在荷兰 4 所教学医院的内科部门进行的前后质量改进研究。使用来自 19 所可比医院的实验室订单量数据作为对照。参与者是开实验室检测的临床医生。

干预措施

干预措施包括通过教育和反馈来提高认识、加强对住院医师的监督,以及改变医嘱录入系统。干预措施由当地项目团队实施,并在 6 个月的时间内由中央项目团队进行指导。在 8 个月的随访期间对可持续性进行了调查。

主要结果和措施

主要结果是实验室检测量的斜率变化。次要结果是实验室支出、其他诊断程序的订单量和支出以及临床结果的斜率变化。收集的数据包括住院时间、门诊复诊率、30 天再入院率以及因肺炎入院的患者意外延长住院时间的比率。

结果

医院 1 至 4 的开检测的内科医生和住院医师人数分别为 16 人和 30 人、18 人和 20 人、13 人和 17 人以及 21 人和 60 人。在医院 1(斜率变化,-1.55;95%置信区间,-1.98 至-1.11;P<.001)、医院 3(斜率变化,-0.74;95%置信区间,-1.42 至-0.07;P=.03)和医院 4(斜率变化,-2.18;95%置信区间,-3.27 至-1.08;P<.001)发现实验室检测量与患者接触的斜率有统计学意义的变化。在医院 2,斜率变化无统计学意义(-0.34;95%置信区间,-2.27 至 1.58;P=.73)。与 19 所可比医院相比,每位患者的实验室检测量减少了 11.4%,而检测量增加了 2.4%。还观察到实验室成本和数量以及其他诊断程序成本的斜率有统计学意义的变化。临床结果与负面变化无关。重要的促进因素是教育、对过度使用的持续关注、反馈和住院医师的参与。重要的障碍是数据检索困难、将原则纳入日常实践困难以及住院医师更替率高。

结论和相关性

一套旨在改变护理人员思维模式的干预措施与所有科室的实验室检测量减少有关,而荷兰可比医院的检测量则有所增加。本研究为在全国范围内实施减少不必要的实验室检测的干预措施提供了框架。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b455/6659142/2a0f04af307b/jamanetwopen-2-e197577-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验