Lince Kimberly C, Patel Devki, Patel Vaishnavi J, Son Young, DeMario Virgil, Sar Sara, Sussman David
Department of Clinically Applied Science Education, University of the Incarnate Word School of Osteopathic Medicine, San Antonio, USA.
Office of Research and Innovation, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center Paul L. Foster School of Medicine, Lubbock, USA.
Cureus. 2025 Mar 24;17(3):e81112. doi: 10.7759/cureus.81112. eCollection 2025 Mar.
Introduction Pelvic organ prolapse (POP) is a very common concern for women that can often necessitate surgical intervention, including sacral colpopexy. There are multiple surgical approaches, including vaginal, extraperitoneal, and intraperitoneal. This study aims to identify predictors of the outcomes with the different surgical approaches. Methods This retrospective study utilized data from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) gynecologic-specific database for those who underwent sacral colpopexy for POP. The group was subdivided into surgical approaches that included abdominal, vaginal extraperitoneal, and vaginal intraperitoneal. ANOVA analysis was performed between the three groups, and a multivariate logistic regression was performed to determine the 30-day complication rate. Results Among the 1,275 cases analyzed, 326 (25.6%) utilized an abdominal approach, 425 (33.3%) utilized a vaginal approach, and 524 (41.1%) utilized an extraperitoneal approach. The mean age was significantly higher for patients undergoing a vaginal extraperitoneal (64.5 years) compared to abdominal (62.1 years) and vaginal intraperitoneal (61.6 years). There was no difference in the 30-day complication rate between the surgical approaches on adjusted analysis; however, the vaginal extraperitoneal approach had the longest hospital stay, days from operation to discharge, and total operation time. Conclusion A variety of surgical approaches for sacral colpopexy can be employed. In our study, we show that the 30-day complication rate was similar between the three approaches; however, the complications were only significant with the abdominal approach showing an increased occurrence of bleeding transfusions when compared to the extraperitoneal approach.
引言
盆腔器官脱垂(POP)是女性非常常见的问题,通常需要手术干预,包括骶骨阴道固定术。有多种手术方法,包括经阴道、腹膜外和腹腔内手术。本研究旨在确定不同手术方法的预后预测因素。
方法
这项回顾性研究使用了美国外科医师学会国家外科质量改进计划(NSQIP)妇科特定数据库中因盆腔器官脱垂接受骶骨阴道固定术患者的数据。该组被细分为包括腹部、经阴道腹膜外和经阴道腹腔内的手术方法。对三组进行方差分析,并进行多因素逻辑回归以确定30天并发症发生率。
结果
在分析的1275例病例中,326例(25.6%)采用腹部手术方法,425例(33.3%)采用经阴道手术方法,524例(41.1%)采用腹膜外手术方法。与腹部手术(62.1岁)和经阴道腹腔内手术(61.6岁)相比,接受经阴道腹膜外手术的患者平均年龄显著更高(64.5岁)。经校正分析,不同手术方法之间的30天并发症发生率没有差异;然而,经阴道腹膜外手术方法的住院时间、从手术到出院的天数和总手术时间最长。
结论
骶骨阴道固定术可以采用多种手术方法。在我们的研究中,我们表明三种手术方法之间的30天并发症发生率相似;然而,与腹膜外手术方法相比,腹部手术方法的并发症仅在出血输血发生率增加方面较为显著。