Sexual dysfunctions in patients with well-compensated chronic liver disease: role of etiology, Mediterranean diet and quality of life in an observational cross-sectional study.

BACKGROUND

Sexual dysfunctions (SD) are highly prevalent in Chronic Liver Diseases (CLD). Whether Metabolic dysfunction-Associated Steatotic Liver Disease (MASLD) carries a higher risk of SD is unknown as is the role of dietary patterns or quality of Life (QoL).

AIM

to assess (1) prevalence of SD in CLD; (2) whether MASLD is a risk factor for SD; (3) the role of adherence to Mediterranean Diet (MD) or QoL.

METHODS

Observational, cross-sectional study, 207 CLD patients (84 females and 123 males), median age 57 years (IQR:46-63); 96 (46.4%) MASLD; and 111 (53.6%) nonMASLD.

OUTCOMES

SD were assessed through Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) and International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) questionnaires. Adherence to MD was evaluated by the MD Score, QoL by SFHS-12 questionnaire evaluating physical [(ie, Physical Component Summary (PCS)] and mental [(ie, Mental Component Summary (MCS)] health. Multivariate analysis identified predictors of SD.

RESULTS

(1) SD prevalence in CLD was 157/207 (75.8%); 80.9% females were at risk for SD, altered sexual desire/arousal and dyspareunia being the most common complaints, whereas 72.3% males had erectile dysfunction (ED); (2) prevalence of SD was higher in MASLD (89%) than in nonMASLD (64%) ( < 0.001); (3) in females, at univariate analysis, a negative correlation was found between FSFI and age, hypertension, or MASLD; (4) in males, at univariate analysis, IIEF-ED negatively correlated with age, DM2, or MASLD, whereas positively correlated with PCS and MCS; (5) in females, at multivariate analysis BMI (OR = 0.779,CI 95% = 0.640-0.948) and MCS (OR = 0.840,CI 95% = 0.741-0.953) were protective against SD, whereas age (OR = 1.115,CI 95% = 1.040-1.263) and DM2 (OR = 120.894,CI 95% = 1.396-10 741) were predictive of SD; (6) in males, at multivariate analysis, age (OR = 1088,CI 95% = 1032-1.148) and MASLD (OR = 4.075,CI 95% = 1.120-14.828) were risk factors for, whereas PCS (OR = 0,928,CI 95% = 0,865-0,995), and disease duration (OR = 0.393,CI 95% = 0.187-0.822) were protective against SD; 7) MD adherence, while higher in nonMASLD vs MASLD ( 0.004), was not an independent protective factor against SD.

CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS

SD should not be underestimated in CLD patients, in particular those with MASLD.

STRENGTHS AND LIMITATIONS

Comprehensive study evaluating SD in a large cohort of CLD patients of both sexes, comparing MASLD vs nonMASLD. Due to its cross-sectional design, no conclusions can be drawn about cause and effect.

CONCLUSIONS

(1) CLD, in particular MASLD, have a high prevalence of SD which is not affected by MD adherence, whereas QoL seems to play a role; (2) CLD patients should be evaluated for SD, for early diagnosis and treatment.