Gonzalez Wendy, Sari Eny Kurnia, Sutrisna Aang, Félix Zineb, Ernada Nabila, Dibyareswati Adhika D, Taillie Lindsey Smith
The Global Alliance for Improved Nutrition, Geneva, Switzerland.
The Global Alliance for Improved Nutrition, Jakarta, Indonesia.
Curr Dev Nutr. 2025 Mar 8;9(4):104586. doi: 10.1016/j.cdnut.2025.104586. eCollection 2025 Apr.
Unhealthy snacking among Indonesian adolescents is common and contributes to rising rates of overweight and obesity. With the growing availability and marketing of ultraprocessed snacks, front-of-package labels (FOPLs) have emerged as a promising tool to help adolescents make healthier snack purchases.
This study aims to explore Indonesian adolescents' drivers of snack purchase, perceptions of different FOPLs, and views on design features that could influence the impact of FOPLs.
We employed a mixed-method design, incorporating both focus group discussions (FDGs) and an online survey. Eight FDGs were conducted with 46 participants aged 12-18, of different socioeconomic status from Jakarta metropolitan areas. Three FOPLs, a warning label, traffic light label (TLL), and "healthier choice" label, were tested both independently and as part of snack packages. The Pan American Health Organization nutrient profile and the UK nutrient profile were used for the warning label and TLL, respectively. Participants completed a demographics questionnaire, then an online assessment and discussion that encompassed food purchasing decisions, reactions to each of the FOPLs, comparison of FOPLs, and comparing alternative label designs for each FOPL type. Thematic analysis and the Likert scale were used for quantitative and qualitative analysis, respectively.
Although adolescents preferred the TLL, finding them informative, attractive, and believable, the information conveyed by the TLL was not well understood, particularly by participants with low socioeconomic status. In contrast, although warning labels were less well-liked, they were better understood, grabbed their attention, and were perceived as most likely to discourage them from buying unhealthy foods. The healthier choice label was perceived as least likely to discourage purchases of unhealthy foods.
Although TLLs are best liked among Indonesian adolescents, warning labels are perceived as most likely to help adolescents identify unhealthy foods and discourage their purchases.
印度尼西亚青少年不健康的零食消费现象普遍,这导致超重和肥胖率不断上升。随着超加工零食的供应和市场推广日益增加,包装正面标签(FOPL)已成为帮助青少年购买更健康零食的一种有前景的工具。
本研究旨在探讨印度尼西亚青少年购买零食的驱动因素、对不同包装正面标签的认知以及对可能影响包装正面标签效果的设计特征的看法。
我们采用了混合方法设计,包括焦点小组讨论(FDG)和在线调查。对来自雅加达都会区不同社会经济地位的46名12 - 18岁参与者进行了8次焦点小组讨论。测试了三种包装正面标签,即警告标签、红绿灯标签(TLL)和“更健康选择”标签,这些标签既单独测试,也作为零食包装的一部分进行测试。泛美卫生组织的营养成分表和英国的营养成分表分别用于警告标签和红绿灯标签。参与者完成一份人口统计学问卷,然后进行一项在线评估和讨论,内容包括食品购买决策、对每种包装正面标签的反应、包装正面标签的比较以及每种标签类型的替代标签设计比较。分别使用主题分析和李克特量表进行定量和定性分析。
尽管青少年更喜欢红绿灯标签,认为其信息丰富、有吸引力且可信,但红绿灯标签所传达的信息并未被很好地理解,尤其是社会经济地位较低的参与者。相比之下,尽管警告标签不太受欢迎,但它们更容易被理解,能吸引注意力,并且被认为最有可能阻止他们购买不健康食品。“更健康选择”标签被认为最不可能阻止购买不健康食品。
尽管红绿灯标签在印度尼西亚青少年中最受欢迎,但警告标签被认为最有可能帮助青少年识别不健康食品并阻止他们购买。