Weissheimer Murillo, Foly João Carlos S N, Carvalho Fabíola G, Münchow Eliseu A
Graduate Program in Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre 90035-004, Brazil.
Graduate Program in Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Federal University of Juiz de Fora, Governador Valadares 35010-180, Brazil.
Dent J (Basel). 2025 Mar 31;13(4):155. doi: 10.3390/dj13040155.
This study tested a method for evaluating the internal fit of indirect resin-based composite (RBC) restorations, as well as the influence of different combinations of impression and die materials on the reproducibility of the topography of teeth prepared for indirect RBC restoration. Bovine incisors received flattened and cavitated areas at the cervical and middle thirds of the buccal surface, respectively. The samples were randomly assigned to two groups according to the material used for impression taking (n = 5): irreversible hydrocolloid and polyvinyl siloxane (PVS). Die replicas were obtained with Type IV gypsum or elastomeric material. RBC restorations were fabricated through an indirect technique (test) and a direct-indirect technique as the control. The internal fit of restorations was assessed by measuring the cementation line thickness with a digital caliper (simulated cementation protocol with ultra-light PVS) and validated using scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Surface topography (Sa, Sq, and Sz) was analyzed via optical profilometry, and wettability was assessed through the water contact angle method. The data were analyzed using -test, ANOVA, and Pearson correlation tests (α = 5%). The simulated cementation resulted in internal gap values positively correlated to the values from SEM (R = 0.958; = 0.0102). The internal gap of restorations was not significantly correlated with the discrepancies between the topography of the die and tooth substrate ( ≥ 0.067). The combination of irreversible hydrocolloid and gypsum resulted in restorations with the lowest cementation line thickness, although in terms of roughness, this combination was the only one that resulted in significant differences from the control ( ≤ 0.028). The internal mean gap values of restorations were significantly correlated to the cumulative wettability difference of materials used during impression taking, fabrication of die replica, and restoration build-up (R = 0.981; = 0.003). The reproducibility of topographical characteristics of the tooth in the die replica did not affect the internal adaptation of indirect RBC restorations, whereas surface wettability of materials presented a more relevant effect on the overall gap formation. The simulated cementation technique tested in the study shows potential as a simpler, cost-effective, and non-destructive method for evaluating the adaptation of indirect RBC restorations.
本研究测试了一种评估间接树脂基复合材料(RBC)修复体内部适合性的方法,以及不同印模材料和模型材料组合对为间接RBC修复体预备的牙齿外形再现性的影响。牛切牙在颊面的颈1/3和中1/3处分别制备了平坦区和洞型区。根据印模材料将样本随机分为两组(n = 5):不可逆水胶体和聚乙烯基硅氧烷(PVS)。用IV型石膏或弹性体材料制作模型复制体。通过间接技术(测试)和直接 - 间接技术(对照)制作RBC修复体。通过用数字卡尺测量粘结线厚度(使用超轻PVS的模拟粘结方案)评估修复体的内部适合性,并使用扫描电子显微镜(SEM)进行验证。通过光学轮廓仪分析表面形貌(Sa、Sq和Sz),并通过水接触角法评估润湿性。使用t检验、方差分析和Pearson相关检验(α = 5%)分析数据。模拟粘结产生的内部间隙值与SEM得到的值呈正相关(R = 0.958;P = 0.0102)。修复体的内部间隙与模型和牙齿基底外形之间的差异无显著相关性(P≥0.067)。不可逆水胶体和石膏的组合产生的修复体粘结线厚度最低,尽管就粗糙度而言,该组合是唯一与对照有显著差异的(P≤0.028)。修复体的内部平均间隙值与印模制取、模型复制体制作和修复体构建过程中所用材料的累积润湿性差异显著相关(R = 0.981;P = 0.003)。模型复制体中牙齿外形特征的再现性不影响间接RBC修复体的内部适应性,而材料的表面润湿性对整体间隙形成的影响更大。本研究中测试的模拟粘结技术显示出作为一种更简单、经济高效且非破坏性的评估间接RBC修复体适应性方法的潜力。