J Oral Facial Pain Headache. 2017;31(2):152-158. doi: 10.11607/ofph.1730.
To quantify the practice patterns of Japanese dentists in the management of pain related to temporomandibular disorders (TMD) and to identify specific characteristics that are significantly associated with the decision to perform occlusal adjustment for TMD-related pain.
A cross-sectional study was conducted consisting of a questionnaire survey of dentists affiliated with the Dental Practice-Based Research Network Japan (JDPBRN) (n = 148). Participants were asked how they diagnosed and treated TMD-related pain. Associations between dentist characteristics and the decision to perform occlusal adjustment were analyzed via multiple logistic regression.
A total of 113 clinicians responded to the questionnaire (76% response rate), and 81% of them (n = 89) had treated TMD during the previous year. Dentists treated an average of 1.9 ± 1.8 (mean ± SD) patients with TMD-related pain per month. Most JDPBRN dentists used similar diagnostic protocols, including questions and examinations. The most frequent treatments were splints or mouthguards (96.5%), medications (84.7%), and self-care (69.4%). Occlusal adjustment for TMD-related pain was performed by 58% of the participants. Multiple logistic regression analysis identified two factors significantly associated with the decision to perform occlusal adjustment: dentist lack of confidence in curing TMD-related acute pain (odds ratio [OR] 5.60; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.260 to 24.861) and proportion of patients with severe TMD-related pain (OR 0.95; 95% CI 0.909 to 0.999).
The most common treatments for TMD-related pain were reversible treatments; however, over half of the dentists performed occlusal adjustment for TMD-related pain. The results of this study suggest that an evidence-practice gap exists for occlusal adjustment for TMD-related pain.
定量日本牙医在管理颞下颌关节紊乱(TMD)相关疼痛方面的实践模式,并确定与决定对 TMD 相关疼痛进行咬合调整具有显著相关性的特定特征。
进行了一项横断面研究,对隶属于日本牙科实践基础研究网络(JDPBRN)的牙医(n=148)进行了问卷调查。参与者被问及他们如何诊断和治疗 TMD 相关疼痛。通过多因素逻辑回归分析了牙医特征与进行咬合调整决定之间的关联。
共有 113 名临床医生回答了问卷(86%的回复率),其中 81%(n=89)在过去一年中治疗过 TMD。牙医每月平均治疗 1.9±1.8(均值±标准差)例 TMD 相关疼痛患者。大多数 JDPBRN 牙医使用类似的诊断方案,包括询问和检查。最常见的治疗方法是夹板或护齿套(96.5%)、药物(84.7%)和自我保健(69.4%)。58%的参与者对 TMD 相关疼痛进行了咬合调整。多因素逻辑回归分析确定了两个与决定进行咬合调整显著相关的因素:牙医对治愈 TMD 相关急性疼痛缺乏信心(比值比[OR]5.60;95%置信区间[CI]1.260 至 24.861)和 TMD 相关疼痛严重程度的患者比例(OR 0.95;95%CI 0.909 至 0.999)。
TMD 相关疼痛的最常见治疗方法是可逆治疗;然而,超过一半的牙医对 TMD 相关疼痛进行了咬合调整。本研究结果表明,在 TMD 相关疼痛的咬合调整方面存在证据与实践之间的差距。