Origo Daniele, Dal Farra Fulvio, Tramontano Marco
Research Department, SOMA Osteopathic Institute Milan, 20126, Milan, Italy.
Department of Information Engineering, University of Brescia, 25123, Brescia, Italy.
Int Urol Nephrol. 2025 Apr 25. doi: 10.1007/s11255-025-04521-2.
This study examines the prevalence of abnormal palpatory findings (APFs) in the different pelvic areas among individuals with chronic pelvic pain syndrome (CPP-CPPS) and assesses correlations between APFs and clinical and psychosocial symptoms.
In this cross-sectional study, 326 participants (162 CPP-CPPS patients, 164 controls) underwent a standardized palpatory assessment of the sacroiliac, sacrococcygeal, and pelvic floor regions. The manual procedure was performed by two expert physiotherapists with a certification in osteopathic manipulation, following a consensus training. We assessed symptom severity and psychosocial variables using the NIH Chronic Prostatitis Symptom Index (NIH-CPSI), the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), and the Fear Avoidance Belief Questionnaire (FABQ). Correlation analyses explored relationships between APFs, the presence of pain, and psychosocial variables.
APFs were significantly associated with CPP/CPPS, particularly in the sacrococcygeal (r = 0.609, p < 0.01) and pelvic floor (r = 0.620, p < 0.01) regions, indicating a moderate-to-strong correlation. The multivariate analysis confirmed that sacrococcygeal APFs (OR 3.02, 95% CI 1.96-4.65, p < 0.001) and pelvic floor APFs (OR 2.99, 95% CI 1.87-4.78, p < 0.001) were independently associated with CPP/CPPS, whereas sacroiliac findings showed a weak correlation. The correlations between APFs and psychosocial issues (anxiety, depression, fear-avoidance) were weak (r = 0.25).
Sacrococcygeal and pelvic floor APFs appear to be important clinical markers of CPP/CPPS. Their presence may help identify patients who could benefit from targeted manual therapy as part of multimodal management. Further research should evaluate the prognostic value of these findings.
本研究调查慢性盆腔疼痛综合征(CPP - CPPS)患者不同盆腔区域触诊异常发现(APF)的患病率,并评估APF与临床及心理社会症状之间的相关性。
在这项横断面研究中,326名参与者(162名CPP - CPPS患者,164名对照)接受了骶髂、骶尾和盆底区域的标准化触诊评估。由两名具有整骨手法操作认证的专家物理治疗师在经过共识培训后进行手动操作。我们使用美国国立卫生研究院慢性前列腺炎症状指数(NIH - CPSI)、医院焦虑抑郁量表(HADS)和恐惧回避信念问卷(FABQ)评估症状严重程度和心理社会变量。相关性分析探讨了APF、疼痛存在与心理社会变量之间的关系。
APF与CPP/CPPS显著相关,尤其是在骶尾(r = 0.609,p < 0.01)和盆底(r = 0.620,p < 0.01)区域,表明存在中度至强相关性。多变量分析证实,骶尾APF(比值比3.02,95%置信区间1.96 - 4.65,p < 0.001)和盆底APF(比值比2.99,95%置信区间1.87 - 4.78,p < 0.001)与CPP/CPPS独立相关,而骶髂检查结果显示相关性较弱。APF与心理社会问题(焦虑、抑郁、恐惧回避)之间的相关性较弱(r = 0.25)。
骶尾和盆底APF似乎是CPP/CPPS的重要临床标志物。它们的存在可能有助于识别那些可从作为多模式管理一部分的针对性手法治疗中获益的患者。进一步的研究应评估这些发现的预后价值。