Suppr超能文献

在初级保健网络中整合高血压咨询服务。

Integrating a High Blood Pressure Advisory Across a Primary Care Network.

作者信息

Phadke Anuradha, Weng Yingjie, Johnson Cati Brown, Winget Marcy, Mahoney Megan, Sharp Christopher, Sattler Amelia, Shah Shreya, Desai Manisha, Ng Stanley, Shaw Jonathan G

机构信息

Division of Primary Care and Population Health, Department of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California.

Quantitative Sciences Unit, Department of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California.

出版信息

JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Apr 1;8(4):e257313. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.7313.

Abstract

IMPORTANCE

Leveraging technology to prompt team-based care might improve ambulatory hypertension care.

OBJECTIVE

To assess whether an electronic medical record (EMR) high blood pressure (BP) advisory improves hypertension control.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This quality improvement study assessed hypertension control in patients presenting to primary care office visits from March 2018 to February 2020. Data were included from 28 primary care clinics (8 clinics contributed data toward the primary objective and 28 contributed data toward secondary objectives) in a single academic health system in California before and after intervention and concurrent care team observations and interviews assessing implementation. Data were analyzed from November 2019 to October 2020.

INTERVENTION

An EMR high BP advisory combined with team training, audit, and feedback. EMR entry of elevated BP (systolic BP ≥140 mm Hg or diastolic BP ≥90 mm Hg) prompted an interruptive medical assistant-facing advisory to recheck BP. Persistently elevated BP prompted a second interruptive clinician-facing advisory with order panel link.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

The primary outcome was BP lower than 140 mm Hg systolic and lower than 90 mm Hg diastolic during an office visit within 6 months of an initial primary care visit. Secondary outcomes included BP recheck after initial elevated value, antihypertensive medication change, and new hypertension diagnoses. Qualitative outcomes focused on implementation barriers and facilitators.

RESULTS

The primary outcome assessed 2760 control patients and 3018 intervention patients with preexisting hypertension (mean [SD] age, 66.5 [14.4] years; 2847 [49.2%] women, 1746 [30.2%] Asian, 619 [10.7%] Hispanic, and 2407 [41.7%] White). The likelihood of hypertension control increased 18.3% per month on average (odds ratio [OR], 1.18; 95% CI, 1.10-1.27; P < .001) in the intervention vs control groups. Modeled rates of adjusted hypertension control over 6 months increased from 82.3% to 92.3% for the intervention cohort and decreased from 71.5% to 70.3% for the control (preintervention) cohort. BP recheck rate increased (from 37.6% to 77.9%; OR, 4.76; 95% CI, 4.45-5.10; P < .001), while ordered antihypertensive medications was unchanged. New hypertension diagnosis increased from 12.1% to 20.6% (OR, 1.34; 95% CI, 1.13-1.58; P = .01). In interviews of 34 care team members (clinicians, medical assistants, and managers) from 6 clinics, implementation barriers included competing priorities and time for BP rechecks, order panel complexity, and mixed clinician engagement; facilitators included intervention visibility, EMR integration, and team-based approach.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

This quality improvement study of an EMR high BP advisory intervention found significantly improved primary care hypertension control and diagnosis due to the combination of team-based care and technology.

摘要

重要性

利用技术促进团队协作式护理可能会改善门诊高血压护理。

目的

评估电子病历(EMR)高血压咨询服务是否能改善高血压控制情况。

设计、背景和参与者:这项质量改进研究评估了2018年3月至2020年2月到初级保健门诊就诊的患者的高血压控制情况。数据来自加利福尼亚州一个学术健康系统中的28家初级保健诊所(8家诊所提供了主要目标数据,28家提供了次要目标数据),涵盖干预前后阶段,并对护理团队进行了同期观察和访谈以评估实施情况。数据于2019年11月至2020年10月进行分析。

干预措施

电子病历高血压咨询服务结合团队培训、审核及反馈。电子病历中记录到血压升高(收缩压≥140毫米汞柱或舒张压≥90毫米汞柱)时,会向面向医疗助理的界面弹出提示性咨询信息以重新测量血压。若血压持续升高,则会向面向临床医生的界面弹出第二条提示性咨询信息,并带有医嘱面板链接。

主要结局和衡量指标

主要结局是在初次初级保健就诊后6个月内的门诊就诊期间,收缩压低于140毫米汞柱且舒张压低于90毫米汞柱。次要结局包括初次血压升高后再次测量血压、抗高血压药物变更以及新的高血压诊断。定性结局聚焦于实施障碍和促进因素。

结果

主要结局评估了2760名对照患者和3018名已有高血压的干预组患者(平均[标准差]年龄为66.5[14.4]岁;女性2847名[49.2%],亚洲人1746名[30.2%],西班牙裔619名[10.7%],白人2407名[41.7%])。与对照组相比,干预组高血压得到控制的可能性平均每月增加18.3%(优势比[OR]为1.18;95%置信区间为1.10 - 1.27;P < 0.001)。干预队列经过调整的6个月高血压控制模拟率从82.3%增至92.3%,而对照(干预前)队列则从71.5%降至70.3%。血压复查率提高(从37.6%升至77.9%;OR为4.76;95%置信区间为4.45 - 5.10;P < 0.001),而开出的抗高血压药物未变。新的高血压诊断率从12.1%增至20.6%(OR为1.34;95%置信区间为1.13 - 1.58;P = 0.01)。在对6家诊所的34名护理团队成员(临床医生、医疗助理和管理人员)进行的访谈中,实施障碍包括相互竞争的优先事项和血压复查时间、医嘱面板复杂性以及临床医生参与度不一;促进因素包括干预的可见性、电子病历整合以及团队协作方法。

结论及意义

这项关于电子病历高血压咨询干预的质量改进研究发现,基于团队的护理与技术相结合显著改善了初级保健中的高血压控制和诊断情况。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a70c/12032570/132a9625b301/jamanetwopen-e257313-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验