• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一种针对伤口护理患者的由护士主导的护理交付应用程序和远程医疗系统:混合方法实施与评估研究。

A Nurse-Led Care Delivery App and Telehealth System for Patients Requiring Wound Care: Mixed Methods Implementation and Evaluation Study.

作者信息

Brown-Johnson Cati G, Lessios Anna Sophia, Thomas Samuel, Kim Mirini, Fukaya Eri, Wu Siqi, Kling Samantha M R, Brown Gretchen, Winget Marcy

机构信息

Evaluation Sciences Unit, Division of Primary Care and Population Health, Department of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA, United States.

PocketRN, Palo Alto, CA, United States.

出版信息

JMIR Form Res. 2023 Aug 23;7:e43258. doi: 10.2196/43258.

DOI:10.2196/43258
PMID:37610798
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10483299/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Innovative solutions to nursing care are needed to address nurse, health system, patient, and caregiver concerns related to nursing wellness, work flexibility and control, workforce retention and pipeline, and access to patient care. One innovative approach includes a novel health care delivery model enabling nurse-led, off-hours wound care (PocketRN) to triage emergent concerns and provide additional patient health education via telehealth.

OBJECTIVE

This pilot study aimed to evaluate the implementation of PocketRN from the perspective of nurses and patients.

METHODS

Patients and part-time or per-diem, wound care-certified and generalist nurses were recruited through the Stanford Medicine Advanced Wound Care Center in 2021 and 2022. Qualitative data included semistructured interviews with nurses and patients and clinical documentation review. Quantitative data included app use and brief end-of-interaction in-app satisfaction surveys.

RESULTS

This pilot study suggests that an app-based nursing care delivery model is acceptable, clinically appropriate, and feasible. Low technology literacy had a modest effect on initial patient adoption; this barrier was addressed with built-in outreach and by simplifying the patient experience (eg, via phone instead of video calls). This approach was acceptable for users, despite total patient enrollment and use numbers being lower than anticipated (N=49; 17/49, 35% of patients used the app at least once beyond the orientation call). We interviewed 10 patients: 7 who had used the app were satisfied with it and reported that real-time advice after hours reduced anxiety, and 3 who had not used the app after enrollment reported having other resources for health care advice and noted their perception that this tool was meant for urgent issues, which did not occur for them. Interviewed nurses (n=10) appreciated working from home, and they reported comfort with the scope of practice and added quality of care facilitated by video capabilities; there was interest in additional wound care-specific training for nonspecialized nurses. Nurses were able to provide direct patient care over the web, including the few participating nurses who were unable to perform in-person care (n=2).

CONCLUSIONS

This evaluation provides insights into the integration of technology into standard health care services, such as in-clinic wound care. Using in-system nurses with access to electronic medical records and specialized knowledge facilitated app integration and continuity of care. This care delivery model satisfied nurse desires for flexible and remote work and reduced patient anxiety, potentially reducing postoperative wound care complications. Feasibility was negatively impacted by patients' technology literacy and few language options; additional patient training, education, and language support are needed to support equitable access. Adoption was impacted by a lack of perceived need for additional care; lower-touch or higher-acuity settings with a longer wait between visits could be a better fit for this type of nurse-led care.

摘要

背景

需要创新的护理解决方案,以解决护士、卫生系统、患者和护理人员在护理健康、工作灵活性与控制权、劳动力保留与人才输送以及获得患者护理方面的问题。一种创新方法包括一种新型医疗服务模式,即由护士主导的非工作时间伤口护理(PocketRN),用于对紧急问题进行分诊,并通过远程医疗提供额外的患者健康教育。

目的

本试点研究旨在从护士和患者的角度评估PocketRN的实施情况。

方法

2021年和2022年,通过斯坦福医学高级伤口护理中心招募了患者以及兼职或按日计酬、具有伤口护理认证的护士和普通护士。定性数据包括对护士和患者的半结构化访谈以及临床文档审查。定量数据包括应用程序使用情况和互动结束时简短的应用程序内满意度调查。

结果

本试点研究表明,基于应用程序的护理服务模式是可接受的、临床适用的且可行的。技术素养较低对患者最初采用该模式有一定影响;通过内置的宣传推广以及简化患者体验(如通过电话而非视频通话)解决了这一障碍。尽管患者登记和使用数量低于预期(N = 49;17/49,35%的患者在入职电话会议之外至少使用过一次该应用程序),但这种方法对用户来说是可接受的。我们采访了10名患者:7名使用过该应用程序的患者对其感到满意,并表示非工作时间的实时建议减轻了焦虑;3名登记后未使用该应用程序的患者表示有其他获取医疗保健建议的资源,并指出他们认为该工具适用于紧急问题,而他们并未遇到此类问题。接受采访的护士(n = 10)对在家工作表示满意,他们对实践范围以及视频功能带来的护理质量提升感到安心;他们对为非专科护士提供额外的伤口护理特定培训很感兴趣。护士能够通过网络直接为患者提供护理,包括少数无法进行面对面护理的参与护士(n = 2)。

结论

本评估为将技术整合到标准医疗服务(如门诊伤口护理)中提供了见解。使用能够访问电子病历并具备专业知识的系统内护士促进了应用程序的整合和护理的连续性。这种护理服务模式满足了护士对灵活和远程工作的需求,并减轻了患者的焦虑,可能减少术后伤口护理并发症。可行性受到患者技术素养和语言选项较少的负面影响;需要额外的患者培训、教育和语言支持以支持公平获取。采用率受到对额外护理需求认知不足的影响;就诊间隔时间较长且接触较少或病情较重的环境可能更适合这种由护士主导的护理模式。

相似文献

1
A Nurse-Led Care Delivery App and Telehealth System for Patients Requiring Wound Care: Mixed Methods Implementation and Evaluation Study.一种针对伤口护理患者的由护士主导的护理交付应用程序和远程医疗系统:混合方法实施与评估研究。
JMIR Form Res. 2023 Aug 23;7:e43258. doi: 10.2196/43258.
2
3
4
Feasibility and outcomes of paid undergraduate student nurse positions.本科护生带薪岗位的可行性与结果
Nurs Leadersh (Tor Ont). 2006 Sep;19(3):e1-14. doi: 10.12927/cjnl.2006.19032.
5
The Experience and Effectiveness of Nurse Practitioners in Orthopaedic Settings: A Comprehensive Systematic Review.执业护士在骨科环境中的经验与成效:一项全面的系统评价
JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2012;10(42 Suppl):1-22. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2012-249.
6
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
7
The effectiveness of internet-based e-learning on clinician behavior and patient outcomes: a systematic review protocol.基于互联网的电子学习对临床医生行为和患者结局的有效性:一项系统评价方案。
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):52-64. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1919.
8
Student and educator experiences of maternal-child simulation-based learning: a systematic review of qualitative evidence protocol.基于母婴模拟学习的学生和教育工作者体验:定性证据协议的系统评价
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):14-26. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1694.
9
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.超越黑木树:影响澳大利亚地区、农村和偏远地区的健康研究问题的快速综述。
Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881.
10

引用本文的文献

1
Integrating a High Blood Pressure Advisory Across a Primary Care Network.在初级保健网络中整合高血压咨询服务。
JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Apr 1;8(4):e257313. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.7313.

本文引用的文献

1
Effect of a Community Health Worker Intervention on Acute Care Use, Advance Care Planning, and Patient-Reported Outcomes Among Adults With Advanced Stages of Cancer: A Randomized Clinical Trial.社区卫生工作者干预对晚期癌症患者急性护理使用、预先护理计划和患者报告结果的影响:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA Oncol. 2022 Aug 1;8(8):1139-1148. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2022.1997.
2
Low-Tech High-Value(s) Care: No Patient Left Behind.低技术高价值医疗:不让任何患者掉队。
Perm J. 2021 Sep 21;25:21.083. doi: 10.7812/TPP/21.083.
3
The worldwide impact of telemedicine during COVID-19: current evidence and recommendations for the future.
COVID-19期间远程医疗的全球影响:当前证据及未来建议
Connect Health. 2022 Jan 4;1:7-35. doi: 10.20517/ch.2021.03.
4
Patient and surgeon experiences with video visits in plastic surgery-toward a data-informed scheduling triage tool.患者和外科医生在整形手术中使用视频访问的体验——开发数据驱动的预约分诊工具。
Surgery. 2021 Aug;170(2):587-595. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2021.03.029. Epub 2021 May 1.
5
Prevalence of and Factors Associated With Nurse Burnout in the US.美国护士职业倦怠的流行状况及相关因素。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Feb 1;4(2):e2036469. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.36469.
6
Implementation outcomes of Humanwide: integrated precision health in team-based family practice primary care.Humanwide:基于团队的家庭实践初级保健中的综合精准健康实施结果。
BMC Fam Pract. 2021 Feb 2;22(1):28. doi: 10.1186/s12875-021-01373-4.
7
Rapid Implementation of Video Visits in Neurology During COVID-19: Mixed Methods Evaluation.新冠疫情期间神经病学中视频就诊的快速实施:混合方法评估。
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Dec 9;22(12):e24328. doi: 10.2196/24328.
8
Rapid Deployment of Inpatient Telemedicine In Response to COVID-19 Across Three Health Systems.COVID-19 大流行期间,三家医疗系统快速部署住院患者远程医疗服务。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2020 Jul 1;27(7):1102-1109. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocaa077.
9
The Stanford Lightning Report Method: A comparison of rapid qualitative synthesis results across four implementation evaluations.斯坦福闪电报告法:四项实施评估中快速定性综合结果的比较
Learn Health Syst. 2019 Dec 21;4(2):e10210. doi: 10.1002/lrh2.10210. eCollection 2020 Apr.
10
Benefit of multidisciplinary wound care center on the volume and outcomes of a vascular surgery practice.多学科创面治疗中心对血管外科手术实践量和效果的益处。
J Vasc Surg. 2019 Nov;70(5):1612-1619. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2019.01.087. Epub 2019 May 29.