Gritsiuta Andrei I, Reep Gabriel, Parupudi Sreeram, Petrov Roman V
Division of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX, United States.
Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX, United States.
J Gastrointest Surg. 2025 Jul;29(7):102069. doi: 10.1016/j.gassur.2025.102069. Epub 2025 Apr 23.
Anastomotic leaks (ALs) after esophagectomy remain a major postoperative complication, leading to increased morbidity, prolonged hospital stays, and higher mortality. Despite advancements in surgical techniques and perioperative care, AL management lacks standardized protocols. This review aimed to evaluate current salvage strategies, including conservative, endoscopic, and surgical approaches, to optimize outcomes and reduce complications.
A comprehensive literature search was conducted using PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar databases to identify studies published between 2000 and 2025 on AL management after esophagectomy. Peer-reviewed clinical trials, guidelines, and expert consensus reports were reviewed, focusing on minimally invasive and surgical interventions, patient outcomes, and emerging treatment strategies.
AL management strategies were classified into 3 primary approaches. Conservative management includes nutritional support, antibiotic therapy, and percutaneous drainage, particularly for contained leaks. Endoscopic interventions, such as self-expanding metal stents and endoscopic vacuum-assisted closure, have shown high success rates, with vacuum-assisted closure achieving superior closure outcomes. Hybrid techniques, including stent-over-sponge and vacuum-assisted closure-stent, are emerging as promising alternatives. Surgical interventions remain the gold standard for severe or refractory leaks with options, including primary repair, esophageal diversion, and delayed conduit reconstruction.
A multidisciplinary approach is crucial for optimizing AL management, incorporating enhanced recovery protocols, early risk assessment, and individualized treatment plans. Endoscopic techniques have reduced the need for surgical revisions, but surgical intervention remains necessary for severe cases. Future research should focus on refining treatment algorithms, integrating novel technologies, and establishing standardized guidelines to improve patient survival and quality of life.
食管切除术后吻合口漏(ALs)仍然是主要的术后并发症,会导致发病率增加、住院时间延长和死亡率升高。尽管手术技术和围手术期护理有所进步,但AL的管理仍缺乏标准化方案。本综述旨在评估当前的挽救策略,包括保守、内镜和手术方法,以优化治疗效果并减少并发症。
使用PubMed、Scopus、Cochrane图书馆和谷歌学术数据库进行全面的文献检索,以识别2000年至2025年期间发表的关于食管切除术后AL管理的研究。对经过同行评审的临床试验、指南和专家共识报告进行了综述,重点关注微创和手术干预、患者结局以及新兴治疗策略。
AL管理策略分为3种主要方法。保守管理包括营养支持、抗生素治疗和经皮引流,特别是对于局限性漏。内镜干预,如自膨式金属支架和内镜真空辅助闭合,已显示出高成功率,其中真空辅助闭合取得了更好的闭合效果。包括支架-海绵联合和真空辅助闭合-支架在内的混合技术正在成为有前景的替代方法。手术干预仍然是严重或难治性漏的金标准,选择包括一期修复、食管改道和延迟管道重建。
多学科方法对于优化AL管理至关重要,包括强化康复方案、早期风险评估和个体化治疗计划。内镜技术减少了手术翻修的需求,但严重病例仍需要手术干预。未来的研究应专注于完善治疗算法、整合新技术并建立标准化指南,以提高患者生存率和生活质量。