• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

中国腹部脓毒症外科患者院内死亡的危险因素:一项巢式病例对照研究

Risk factors for in-hospital mortality in surgical patients with abdominal sepsis in China: a nested case-control study.

作者信息

Shi Yue, Tao Tianzhu, Ye Xiaofei, Ye Bo, Mi Weidong, Lou Jingsheng

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology, Air Force Medical Center, Beijing, China.

China Medical University, Shenyang, Liaoning, China.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2025 Apr 25;15(4):e092310. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-092310.

DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2024-092310
PMID:40280608
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12035482/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To delineate the clinical characteristics and investigate the determinants that may affect the prognosis of surgical patients with abdominal sepsis.

DESIGN

A case-control study was nested in a cohort of surgical patients with abdominal sepsis between 2008 and 2022. We extracted patient' medical records to execute descriptive statistical analyses. Multiple logistic regression models and subgroup analysis were employed to elucidate the risk factors of in-hospital mortality.

SETTING

Two tertiary hospitals in China.

PARTICIPANTS

476 surgical patients diagnosed with abdominal sepsis between 2008 and 2022 were analysed.

INTERVENTIONS

None.

OUTCOME MEASURES

Descriptive statistics were used to examine pertinent patient information, including demographic details, laboratory findings, surgical interventions and anaesthetic records. Multivariate logistic regression was used to identify independent risk factors for in-hospital mortality. Subgroup analyses were conducted to explore the impact of specific clinical characteristics on outcomes.

RESULTS

476 patients diagnosed with abdominal sepsis were analysed, exhibiting an in-hospital mortality rate of 7.56%. Advanced age (OR 6.77, 95% CI 2.46 to 18.66, p<0.001), the presence of diabetes (OR 2.61, 95% CI 1.04 to 6.56, p=0.041) and higher preoperative Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score (OR 3.48, 95% CI 1.16 to 10.43, p=0.026) were identified as significant predictors of increased in-hospital mortality risk through a multinomial logistic regression model. Conversely, individuals afflicted with biliary diseases (OR 0.15, 95% CI 0.04 to 0.64, p=0.010) demonstrated a reduced risk of in-hospital mortality. Subgroup analysis revealed that low serum albumin levels emerged as a risk factor for in-hospital mortality in the patients with gastrointestinal diseases (OR 20.23, 95% CI 2.21 to 184.84, p=0.008) or advanced age (OR 10.52, 95% CI 2.29 to 48.31, p=0.002) through multinomial logistic regression analysis.

CONCLUSION

In this retrospective analysis, we delineated the clinical characteristics of surgical patients with abdominal sepsis and pinpointed risk factors associated with in-hospital mortality. These findings underscore the necessity for more tailored perioperative management strategies for patients with sepsis characterised by advanced age, diabetes, higher preoperative SOFA score and reduced preoperative albumin levels. Clinicians should prioritise early recognition and aggressive management of these high-risk individuals, including timely surgical intervention, optimisation of nutritional status and vigilant monitoring of organ function. These insights underscore the critical role of individualised care in enhancing the prognosis of surgical patients with abdominal sepsis.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

ChiCTR2400081823.

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/be98/12035482/cddaa8b56266/bmjopen-15-4-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/be98/12035482/216bb2eabab2/bmjopen-15-4-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/be98/12035482/cddaa8b56266/bmjopen-15-4-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/be98/12035482/216bb2eabab2/bmjopen-15-4-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/be98/12035482/cddaa8b56266/bmjopen-15-4-g002.jpg
摘要

目的

描述腹部脓毒症手术患者的临床特征,并研究可能影响其预后的决定因素。

设计

一项病例对照研究嵌套于2008年至2022年间腹部脓毒症手术患者队列中。我们提取患者病历以进行描述性统计分析。采用多重逻辑回归模型和亚组分析来阐明院内死亡的危险因素。

地点

中国的两家三级医院。

参与者

分析了2008年至2022年间476例诊断为腹部脓毒症的手术患者。

干预措施

无。

观察指标

采用描述性统计分析相关患者信息,包括人口统计学细节、实验室检查结果、手术干预和麻醉记录。使用多变量逻辑回归确定院内死亡的独立危险因素。进行亚组分析以探讨特定临床特征对结局的影响。

结果

分析了476例诊断为腹部脓毒症的患者,院内死亡率为7.56%。通过多项逻辑回归模型确定,高龄(比值比6.77,95%置信区间2.46至18.66,p<0.001)、糖尿病(比值比2.61,95%置信区间1.04至6.56,p=0.041)和术前序贯器官衰竭评估(SOFA)评分较高(比值比3.48,95%置信区间1.16至10.43,p=0.026)是院内死亡风险增加的显著预测因素。相反,患有胆道疾病的个体(比值比0.15,95%置信区间0.04至0.64,p=0.010)院内死亡风险降低。亚组分析显示,通过多项逻辑回归分析,低血清白蛋白水平是胃肠道疾病患者(比值比20.23,95%置信区间2.21至184.84,p=0.008)或高龄患者(比值比10.52,95%置信区间2.29至48.31,p=0.002)院内死亡的危险因素。

结论

在这项回顾性分析中,我们描述了腹部脓毒症手术患者的临床特征,并确定了与院内死亡相关的危险因素。这些发现强调了针对高龄、糖尿病、术前SOFA评分较高和术前白蛋白水平降低的脓毒症患者制定更具针对性的围手术期管理策略的必要性。临床医生应优先对这些高危个体进行早期识别和积极管理,包括及时的手术干预、营养状况的优化和器官功能的密切监测。这些见解强调了个体化护理在改善腹部脓毒症手术患者预后中的关键作用。

试验注册号

ChiCTR2400081823。

相似文献

1
Risk factors for in-hospital mortality in surgical patients with abdominal sepsis in China: a nested case-control study.中国腹部脓毒症外科患者院内死亡的危险因素:一项巢式病例对照研究
BMJ Open. 2025 Apr 25;15(4):e092310. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-092310.
2
[A multicenter clinical study of critically ill patients with sepsis complicated with acute kidney injury in Beijing: incidence, clinical characteristics and outcomes].北京地区脓毒症合并急性肾损伤危重症患者的多中心临床研究:发病率、临床特征及预后
Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2024 Jun;36(6):567-573. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn121430-20240210-00124.
3
Validation of prognostic accuracy of the SOFA score, SIRS criteria, and qSOFA score for in-hospital mortality among cardiac-, thoracic-, and vascular-surgery patients admitted to a cardiothoracic intensive care unit.入住心胸重症监护病房的心脏、胸科和血管手术患者中,序贯器官衰竭评估(SOFA)评分、全身炎症反应综合征(SIRS)标准及快速序贯器官衰竭评估(qSOFA)评分对院内死亡率预后准确性的验证。
J Card Surg. 2020 Jan;35(1):118-127. doi: 10.1111/jocs.14331. Epub 2019 Nov 11.
4
Platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio as a prognostic predictor of mortality for sepsis: interaction effect with disease severity-a retrospective study.血小板与淋巴细胞比值作为脓毒症死亡率的预后预测指标:与疾病严重程度的交互作用-一项回顾性研究。
BMJ Open. 2019 Jan 25;9(1):e022896. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-022896.
5
[Clinical characteristics of elderly patients with sepsis and development and evaluation of death risk assessment scale].[老年脓毒症患者的临床特征及死亡风险评估量表的研制与评价]
Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2025 Jan;37(1):17-22. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn121430-20240103-00009.
6
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
7
Sequential Organ Failure Assessment Component Score Prediction of In-hospital Mortality From Sepsis.序贯器官衰竭评估组件评分预测脓毒症患者住院死亡率。
J Intensive Care Med. 2020 Aug;35(8):810-817. doi: 10.1177/0885066618795400. Epub 2018 Aug 30.
8
Predictive Value of Serum Albumin Level for the Prognosis of Severe Sepsis Without Exogenous Human Albumin Administration: A Prospective Cohort Study.血清白蛋白水平对未使用外源性人白蛋白的严重脓毒症患者预后的预测价值:一项前瞻性队列研究。
J Intensive Care Med. 2018 Dec;33(12):687-694. doi: 10.1177/0885066616685300. Epub 2016 Dec 26.
9
Prognostic Accuracy of the SOFA Score, SIRS Criteria, and qSOFA Score for In-Hospital Mortality Among Adults With Suspected Infection Admitted to the Intensive Care Unit.SOFA 评分、SIRS 标准和 qSOFA 评分对 ICU 收治的疑似感染成人院内死亡率的预后准确性。
JAMA. 2017 Jan 17;317(3):290-300. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.20328.
10
Assessment of Clinical Criteria for Sepsis: For the Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3).脓毒症临床标准评估:针对《脓毒症及脓毒性休克第三次国际共识定义》(Sepsis-3)。
JAMA. 2016 Feb 23;315(8):762-74. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.0288.

本文引用的文献

1
Influence of gender on age-associated in-hospital mortality in patients with sepsis and septic shock: a prospective nationwide multicenter cohort study.性别对脓毒症和脓毒性休克患者与年龄相关的院内死亡率的影响:一项前瞻性全国多中心队列研究。
Crit Care. 2023 Jun 11;27(1):229. doi: 10.1186/s13054-023-04515-5.
2
Association between the timing of ICU admission and mortality in patients with hospital-onset sepsis: a nationwide prospective cohort study.医院获得性脓毒症患者入住重症监护病房的时间与死亡率之间的关联:一项全国性前瞻性队列研究。
J Intensive Care. 2023 Apr 21;11(1):16. doi: 10.1186/s40560-023-00663-6.
3
Different Concentrations of Albumin Versus Crystalloid in Patients with Sepsis and Septic Shock: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials.
不同浓度白蛋白与晶体液在脓毒症和感染性休克患者中的应用:随机临床试验的荟萃分析。
J Intensive Care Med. 2023 Aug;38(8):679-689. doi: 10.1177/08850666231170778. Epub 2023 Apr 20.
4
The systemic immune-inflammation index in predicting sepsis mortality.全身免疫炎症指数在预测脓毒症死亡率中的作用
Postgrad Med. 2023 May;135(4):345-351. doi: 10.1080/00325481.2022.2140535. Epub 2022 Nov 8.
5
Dexmedetomidine and Propofol Sedation in Critically Ill Patients and Dose-associated 90-Day Mortality: A Secondary Cohort Analysis of a Randomized Controlled Trial (SPICE III).右美托咪定和丙泊酚镇静在危重症患者中的应用及与剂量相关的 90 天死亡率:一项随机对照试验(SPICE III)的二次队列分析。
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2023 Apr 1;207(7):876-886. doi: 10.1164/rccm.202206-1208OC.
6
Diabetes mellitus and perioperative outcomes: a scoping review of the literature.糖尿病与围手术期结局:文献综述
Br J Anaesth. 2022 May;128(5):817-828. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2022.02.013. Epub 2022 Mar 14.
7
Intra-abdominal Infections.腹腔内感染
Semin Respir Crit Care Med. 2022 Feb;43(1):10-27. doi: 10.1055/s-0041-1741053. Epub 2022 Feb 16.
8
Surviving sepsis campaign: international guidelines for management of sepsis and septic shock 2021.拯救脓毒症运动:2021年脓毒症和脓毒性休克国际管理指南
Intensive Care Med. 2021 Nov;47(11):1181-1247. doi: 10.1007/s00134-021-06506-y. Epub 2021 Oct 2.
9
Blood lactate levels in sepsis: in 8 questions.脓毒症患者的血乳酸水平:8 个问题。
Curr Opin Crit Care. 2021 Jun 1;27(3):298-302. doi: 10.1097/MCC.0000000000000824.
10
Pathophysiology of sepsis-induced cardiomyopathy.脓毒症性心肌病的病理生理学。
Nat Rev Cardiol. 2021 Jun;18(6):424-434. doi: 10.1038/s41569-020-00492-2. Epub 2021 Jan 20.