• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于胱抑素C和肌酐的估计肾小球滤过率差异与脑小血管病的关联:一项大型前瞻性队列研究。

Association of the difference between cystatin C- and creatinine-based estimated glomerular filtration rate with cerebral small vessel disease: A large prospective cohort study.

作者信息

Li Zhiming, Wang Fei, Liu Jincheng, Xiong Benbo, Wang Han, Wang Zijie, Hu Xiao, Li Qi

机构信息

Department of Neurology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China.

Department of Neurology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China; Department of Neurology, Xiangyang Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Xiangyang, Hubei, China.

出版信息

J Prev Alzheimers Dis. 2025 Aug;12(7):100190. doi: 10.1016/j.tjpad.2025.100190. Epub 2025 Apr 24.

DOI:10.1016/j.tjpad.2025.100190
PMID:40280803
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12321633/
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

It remains unclear whether the difference between the estimated glomerular filtration rate based on cystatin C and creatinine (eGFRdiff) is associated with cerebral small vessel disease (CSVD). We investigated the correlation of eGFRdiff with SCVD and further evaluated the mediating role of blood pressure.

METHODS

This prospective cohort study included 35,590 neurologically healthy participants at baseline (2006 to 2010) from the UK Biobank. eGFRdiff is divided into two indicators: absolute difference (eGFRabdiff) and ratio (eGFRrediff) based on the calculation between cystatin C and creatinine. CSVD was assessed by calculating white matter hyperintensity volume (WMHV) from T2-FLAIR brain MRI scans (conducted between 2014 and 2021), with values normalized to intracranial volume and log-transformed. Multiple linear regression models and mediation analysis was used to evaluate the associations of eGFRdiff with WMHV.

RESULTS

Participants with negative eGFRabdiff had higher WMHV (β = 0.07, 95 % confidence interval [CL] = 0.04 ∼ 0.10), while participants with positive eGFRabdiff had smaller WMHV (β = -0.05, 95 %CL = -0.09 ∼ -0.02), compared to midrange eGFRabdiff group. Meanwhile, participants with eGFRrediff ≤ 0.7 had higher WMHV compared with participants with eGFRrediff > 0.7 (β = 0.08, 95 %CL = 0.01∼ 0.15) .In addition, hypertension mediated the associations between eGFRdiff and WMHV (12.6 % ∼13.2 %).

CONCLUSION

eGFRdiff was independently associated with WMHV. Our findings suggested that monitoring eGFRdiff has potential benefits in identifying the burden of CSVD in the general population in future.

摘要

背景与目的

基于胱抑素C和肌酐的估计肾小球滤过率差异(eGFRdiff)与脑小血管病(CSVD)之间是否存在关联尚不清楚。我们研究了eGFRdiff与CSVD的相关性,并进一步评估了血压的中介作用。

方法

这项前瞻性队列研究纳入了英国生物银行中35590名基线时(2006年至2010年)神经系统健康的参与者。根据胱抑素C和肌酐之间的计算,eGFRdiff分为两个指标:绝对差值(eGFRabdiff)和比值(eGFRrediff)。通过计算T2-FLAIR脑MRI扫描(2014年至2021年进行)中的白质高信号体积(WMHV)来评估CSVD,其值经颅内体积标准化并进行对数转换。使用多元线性回归模型和中介分析来评估eGFRdiff与WMHV的关联。

结果

与中等范围eGFRabdiff组相比,eGFRabdiff为负的参与者WMHV更高(β = 0.07,95%置信区间[CI] = 0.04 ∼ 0.10),而eGFRabdiff为正的参与者WMHV更小(β = -0.05,95%CI = -0.09 ∼ -0.02)。同时,与eGFRrediff > 0.7的参与者相比,eGFRrediff ≤ 0.7的参与者WMHV更高(β = 0.08,95%CI = 0.01 ∼ 0.15)。此外,高血压介导了eGFRdiff与WMHV之间的关联(12.6% ∼ 13.2%)。

结论

eGFRdiff与WMHV独立相关。我们的研究结果表明,监测eGFRdiff在未来识别普通人群中CSVD负担方面具有潜在益处。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c8e4/12321633/edc1f1cf60e3/gr4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c8e4/12321633/be17090c4a86/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c8e4/12321633/2117cbc0a4eb/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c8e4/12321633/21dba509295d/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c8e4/12321633/edc1f1cf60e3/gr4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c8e4/12321633/be17090c4a86/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c8e4/12321633/2117cbc0a4eb/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c8e4/12321633/21dba509295d/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c8e4/12321633/edc1f1cf60e3/gr4.jpg

相似文献

1
Association of the difference between cystatin C- and creatinine-based estimated glomerular filtration rate with cerebral small vessel disease: A large prospective cohort study.基于胱抑素C和肌酐的估计肾小球滤过率差异与脑小血管病的关联:一项大型前瞻性队列研究。
J Prev Alzheimers Dis. 2025 Aug;12(7):100190. doi: 10.1016/j.tjpad.2025.100190. Epub 2025 Apr 24.
2
Difference between estimated glomerular filtration rate based on cystatin c versus creatinine and risk of hypertension: a prospective cohort study.基于胱抑素C与肌酐的估计肾小球滤过率差异与高血压风险:一项前瞻性队列研究。
Eur J Med Res. 2025 Aug 4;30(1):705. doi: 10.1186/s40001-025-02988-4.
3
Complex Etiologies of the Discordance Between Cystatin C- and Creatinine-Based Estimated GFR and Its Adverse Associations: Findings From the CRIC Study.基于胱抑素C和肌酐的估算肾小球滤过率不一致的复杂病因及其不良关联:慢性肾脏疾病队列研究(CRIC研究)的结果
Am J Kidney Dis. 2025 Aug;86(2):192-201. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2025.03.018. Epub 2025 May 13.
4
Difference between cystatin C- and creatinine-based estimated glomerular filtration rate, diabetes status, and incident peripheral artery disease: A population-based cohort study.基于胱抑素C和肌酐的估计肾小球滤过率、糖尿病状态与外周动脉疾病发病率之间的差异:一项基于人群的队列研究。
Atherosclerosis. 2025 Sep;408:120452. doi: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2025.120452. Epub 2025 Jul 17.
5
Association of Differences in Cystatin C- and Creatinine-Based Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate With Prevalence and Incidence of Stroke.基于胱抑素C和肌酐的估计肾小球滤过率差异与中风患病率和发病率的关联
J Am Heart Assoc. 2025 Jun 3;14(11):e039185. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.124.039185. Epub 2025 May 23.
6
Association of Difference Between eGFR From Cystatin C and Creatinine and Serum GDF-15 With Adverse Outcomes in Diabetes Mellitus.基于胱抑素C和肌酐的估算肾小球滤过率差值及血清生长分化因子-15与糖尿病不良结局的关联
J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle. 2025 Aug;16(4):e70011. doi: 10.1002/jcsm.70011.
7
Difference between cystatin C- and creatinine-based estimated glomerular filtration rate and risk of frailty: Mediating role of high-sensitivity C-reaction protein in older adults.基于胱抑素C和肌酐的估计肾小球滤过率差异与衰弱风险:高敏C反应蛋白在老年人中的中介作用
Clin Nutr ESPEN. 2025 Jul 26;69:375-383. doi: 10.1016/j.clnesp.2025.07.1112.
8
Cerebral small vessel disease and effects of intensive versus standard blood pressure treatment on cardiovascular outcomes and adverse events.脑小血管病以及强化与标准血压治疗对心血管结局和不良事件的影响。
J Hypertens. 2025 Jun 27. doi: 10.1097/HJH.0000000000004093.
9
Association of Differences in Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate by Cystatin C versus Creatinine with Adverse Events in Adults Undergoing Major Surgery: A Multicenter Cohort Study.基于胱抑素C与肌酐评估的肾小球滤过率差异与接受大手术的成人不良事件的关联:一项多中心队列研究
Am J Nephrol. 2025 Jun 11:1-11. doi: 10.1159/000545915.
10
Osteopontin Is Associated with Dementia in the Presence of Cerebral Small Vessel Disease.骨桥蛋白与脑小血管病相关的痴呆有关。
Cerebrovasc Dis. 2024;53(4):495-500. doi: 10.1159/000533953. Epub 2023 Sep 6.

引用本文的文献

1
Sarcopenia index based on serum creatinine and cystatin C is associated with the risk of stroke in middle-aged and older adults in Chinese: a prospective cohort study from the China health and retirement longitudinal study.基于血清肌酐和胱抑素C的肌少症指数与中国中老年人群的中风风险相关:一项来自中国健康与养老追踪调查的前瞻性队列研究
BMC Neurol. 2025 Sep 1;25(1):371. doi: 10.1186/s12883-025-04327-w.

本文引用的文献

1
Associations of Cerebral Small Vessel Disease and Chronic Kidney Disease in Patients With Acute Intracerebral Hemorrhage: A Cross-Sectional Study.急性脑出血患者脑小血管病与慢性肾脏病的相关性:一项横断面研究。
Neurology. 2024 Jul 23;103(2):e209540. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000209540. Epub 2024 Jun 18.
2
The Difference Between Cystatin C- and Creatinine-Based Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate and Risk of Diabetic Microvascular Complications Among Adults With Diabetes: A Population-Based Cohort Study.胱抑素 C- 和基于肌酐的估算肾小球滤过率在糖尿病患者的糖尿病微血管并发症风险中的差异:一项基于人群的队列研究。
Diabetes Care. 2024 May 1;47(5):873-880. doi: 10.2337/dc23-2364.
3
Difference Between Estimated GFR Based on Cystatin C Versus Creatinine and Incident Atrial Fibrillation: A Cohort Study of the UK Biobank.
基于胱抑素 C 与肌酐的估算肾小球滤过率的差异与房颤事件:英国生物库的队列研究。
Am J Kidney Dis. 2024 Jun;83(6):729-738.e1. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2023.11.004. Epub 2024 Jan 1.
4
Cerebral Small Vessel Disease, Hypertension, and Vascular Contributions to Cognitive Impairment and Dementia.脑小血管病、高血压与血管因素对认知障碍和痴呆的影响。
Hypertension. 2024 Jan;81(1):75-86. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.123.19943. Epub 2023 Nov 29.
5
Association of Cumulative Lifetime Exposure to Female Hormones With Cerebral Small Vessel Disease in Postmenopausal Women in the UK Biobank.英国生物库中老年女性中女性激素累积终生暴露与脑小血管病的关系。
Neurology. 2023 Nov 14;101(20):e1970-e1978. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000207845. Epub 2023 Sep 27.
6
Discordance Between Creatinine-Based and Cystatin C-Based Estimated GFR: Interpretation According to Performance Compared to Measured GFR.基于肌酐和基于胱抑素C的估算肾小球滤过率之间的不一致性:与实测肾小球滤过率相比,根据性能进行解读
Kidney Med. 2023 Aug 9;5(10):100710. doi: 10.1016/j.xkme.2023.100710. eCollection 2023 Oct.
7
Discrepancies between Cystatin C-Based and Creatinine-Based eGFR.胱抑素 C 与基于肌酐的 eGFR 之间的差异。
Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2023 Sep 1;18(9):1143-1152. doi: 10.2215/CJN.0000000000000217. Epub 2023 Jun 20.
8
Cerebral small vessel disease: Recent advances and future directions.脑小血管病:最新进展与未来方向。
Int J Stroke. 2023 Jan;18(1):4-14. doi: 10.1177/17474930221144911.
9
The global burden of cerebral small vessel disease in low- and middle-income countries: A systematic review and meta-analysis.低收入和中等收入国家脑小血管病的全球负担:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Int J Stroke. 2023 Jan;18(1):15-27. doi: 10.1177/17474930221137019. Epub 2022 Nov 25.
10
Association of Cystatin C Kidney Function Measures With Long-term Deficit-Accumulation Frailty Trajectories and Physical Function Decline.胱抑素 C 肾功能指标与长期累积性虚弱轨迹和身体功能下降的关系。
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Sep 1;5(9):e2234208. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.34208.