Chen Li-Da, Wu Shi-Cheng, Lin Xue-Jun, Yang Chu-Dan, Cai Zhi-Ming, Lin Li, Lian Ning-Fang, Wu Zhi
Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Zhangzhou Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, No 59, Shenglixi road, Xiangcheng district, Zhangzhou, Fujian Province, 363000, China.
Sleep Medicine Center, Zhangzhou Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Zhangzhou, Fujian Province, China.
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2025 Apr 25. doi: 10.1007/s00405-025-09409-6.
Positional obstructive sleep apnea (POSA) is common among obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) patients and exhibits distinct clinical features. This study aimed to analyze the clinical characteristics and associated factors of POSA, as well as compare the outcomes between POSA and non-POSA (NPOSA).
OSA subjects aged over 40 years from the Sleep Heart Health Study were included in this study. OSA was classified into POSA and NPOSA according to the Cartwright criteria. Univariate and multivariable logistic regression analyses were conducted to identify predictors of POSA. The incidence of outcome events across the two groups was assessed using cumulative hazard curves and compared with the log-rank test.
A total of 1,080 OSA subjects were included, with 412 in the NPOSA group and 668 in the POSA group. In the univariate analysis, body mass index, diabetes, apnea-hypopnea index (AHI), the percentage of sleep time with oxygen saturation below 90% (CT90) and arousal index were inversely associated with POSA, average oxygen saturation during sleep and minimum oxygen saturation during sleep were positively associated with POSA. In the multivariate analysis, AHI (OR 0.98, 95% CI 0.97 to 0.99, p = 0.006) and CT90 (OR 0.98, 95% CI 0.96 to 1.00, p = 0.027) remained significantly inversely associated with POSA after adjusting for other variables. There was no significant difference in the cumulative hazard of myocardial infarction, stroke, congestive heart failure, or all-cause mortality between the two groups during the mean follow-up period of 11 years.
This study identified AHI and CT90 as independent predictive factors for POSA. There was no significant difference in the incidence of myocardial infarction, stroke, congestive heart failure, or all-cause mortality between POSA and NPOSA.
体位性阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停(POSA)在阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停(OSA)患者中很常见,且具有独特的临床特征。本研究旨在分析POSA的临床特征及相关因素,并比较POSA与非体位性阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停(NPOSA)之间的结局。
本研究纳入了睡眠心脏健康研究中40岁以上的OSA受试者。根据卡特赖特标准将OSA分为POSA和NPOSA。进行单因素和多因素逻辑回归分析以确定POSA的预测因素。使用累积风险曲线评估两组结局事件的发生率,并通过对数秩检验进行比较。
共纳入1080例OSA受试者,其中NPOSA组412例,POSA组668例。单因素分析中,体重指数、糖尿病、呼吸暂停低通气指数(AHI)、血氧饱和度低于90%的睡眠时间百分比(CT90)和觉醒指数与POSA呈负相关,睡眠期间平均血氧饱和度和睡眠期间最低血氧饱和度与POSA呈正相关。多因素分析中,调整其他变量后,AHI(比值比[OR]0.98,95%置信区间[CI]0.97至0.99,p = 0.006)和CT90(OR 0.98,95% CI 0.96至1.00,p = 0.027)仍与POSA显著负相关。在11年的平均随访期内,两组之间心肌梗死、中风、充血性心力衰竭或全因死亡率的累积风险无显著差异。
本研究确定AHI和CT90为POSA的独立预测因素。POSA和NPOSA之间心肌梗死、中风、充血性心力衰竭或全因死亡率的发生率无显著差异。