• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在接受Impella治疗的心源性休克患者中结合患者特征和生物标志物进行联合风险分层

Combined Risk Stratification With Patient Characteristics and Biomarkers in Patients Treated With the Impella for Cardiogenic Shock.

作者信息

Saito Yuichi, Shiko Yuki, Tateishi Kazuya, Toda Koichi, Matsumiya Goro, Kobayashi Yoshio

机构信息

Department of Cardiovascular Medicine Chiba University Graduate School of Medicine Chiba Japan.

Biostatistics Section, Clinical Research Center Chiba University Hospital Chiba Japan.

出版信息

J Am Heart Assoc. 2025 May 6;14(9):e040487. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.124.040487. Epub 2025 Apr 25.

DOI:10.1161/JAHA.124.040487
PMID:40281652
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12184222/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

In patients with cardiogenic shock (CS), a percutaneous microaxial ventricular assist device (Impella, Abiomed, Danvers, MA) is a choice for temporary mechanical circulatory support. Given the high morbidity and mortality in this patient population, early risk stratification is relevant when making treatment decisions.

METHODS

Using nationwide registry data between February 2020 and December 2022 in Japan, we included a total of 4122 patients with cardiogenic shock treated with the Impella devices. Using logistic regression analysis, we incorporated patient characteristics and biomarkers to develop a risk-stratifying model for in-hospital mortality. The model was also tested if applicable to composite outcomes of in-hospital death and major complications.

RESULTS

Of the 4122 patients with cardiogenic shock, the Impella was indicated for acute myocardial infarction in 2575 (62.5%). Multivariable analysis identified 4 patient characteristics (age, body mass index, out-of-hospital cardiac arrest, and blood pressure) and 6 biomarkers (lactate, lactate dehydrogenase, creatinine, total bilirubin, albumin, and creatinine kinase) with cutoff values as factors significantly associated with in-hospital mortality. We developed a risk-stratifying model using the 10 variables, which was predictive of in-hospital death (area under the curve, 0.711; <0.001). Adding biomarkers to patient characteristics significantly improved the diagnostic accuracy (area under the curve, from 0.649 to 0.711; <0.001). This risk score was also predictive of death and major complications (area under the curve, 0.680; <0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with cardiogenic shock treated with the Impella devices, our risk-stratifying system, consisting of 4 patient characteristics and 6 biomarkers, strongly correlated with in-hospital mortality, potentially facilitating clinical decision-making.

摘要

背景

在心源 性休克(CS)患者中,经皮微轴心室辅助装置(Impella,Abiomed,丹弗斯,马萨诸塞州)是临时机械循环支持的一种选择。鉴于该患者群体的高发病率和死亡率,在做出治疗决策时进行早期风险分层具有重要意义。

方法

利用日本2020年2月至2022年12月期间的全国登记数据,我们纳入了总共4122例接受Impella装置治疗的心源性休克患者。使用逻辑回归分析,我们纳入患者特征和生物标志物来建立院内死亡风险分层模型。还测试了该模型是否适用于院内死亡和主要并发症的复合结局。

结果

在4122例心源性休克患者中,Impella用于急性心肌梗死的有2575例(62.5%)。多变量分析确定了4个患者特征(年龄、体重指数、院外心脏骤停和血压)和6种生物标志物(乳酸、乳酸脱氢酶、肌酐、总胆红素、白蛋白和肌酸激酶)及其临界值为与院内死亡显著相关的因素。我们使用这10个变量建立了一个风险分层模型,该模型可预测院内死亡(曲线下面积,0.711;P<0.001)。将生物标志物添加到患者特征中可显著提高诊断准确性(曲线下面积,从0.649提高到0.711;P<0.001)。该风险评分也可预测死亡和主要并发症(曲线下面积,0.680;P<0.001)。

结论

在接受Impella装置治疗的心源性休克患者中,我们由4个患者特征和6种生物标志物组成的风险分层系统与院内死亡率密切相关,可能有助于临床决策。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0f68/12184222/eaabacd63508/JAH3-14-e040487-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0f68/12184222/2a9027e1ea26/JAH3-14-e040487-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0f68/12184222/8e75b817c347/JAH3-14-e040487-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0f68/12184222/e1654f32ffd2/JAH3-14-e040487-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0f68/12184222/d8f75352fa94/JAH3-14-e040487-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0f68/12184222/880a921b5fe2/JAH3-14-e040487-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0f68/12184222/eaabacd63508/JAH3-14-e040487-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0f68/12184222/2a9027e1ea26/JAH3-14-e040487-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0f68/12184222/8e75b817c347/JAH3-14-e040487-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0f68/12184222/e1654f32ffd2/JAH3-14-e040487-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0f68/12184222/d8f75352fa94/JAH3-14-e040487-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0f68/12184222/880a921b5fe2/JAH3-14-e040487-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0f68/12184222/eaabacd63508/JAH3-14-e040487-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Combined Risk Stratification With Patient Characteristics and Biomarkers in Patients Treated With the Impella for Cardiogenic Shock.在接受Impella治疗的心源性休克患者中结合患者特征和生物标志物进行联合风险分层
J Am Heart Assoc. 2025 May 6;14(9):e040487. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.124.040487. Epub 2025 Apr 25.
2
Safety and efficacy of mechanical circulatory support with Impella or intra-aortic balloon pump for high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention and/or cardiogenic shock: Insights from a network meta-analysis of randomized trials.机械循环支持联合 Impella 或主动脉内球囊泵在高危经皮冠状动脉介入治疗和/或心源性休克中的安全性和疗效:来自随机试验网络荟萃分析的见解。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2021 Apr 1;97(5):E636-E645. doi: 10.1002/ccd.29236. Epub 2020 Sep 7.
3
Inotropic agents and vasodilator strategies for the treatment of cardiogenic shock or low cardiac output syndrome.用于治疗心源性休克或低心输出量综合征的正性肌力药物和血管扩张剂策略。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Jan 29;1(1):CD009669. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009669.pub3.
4
Left Ventricular Unloading Before Percutaneous Coronary Intervention is Associated With Improved Survival in Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction Complicated by Cardiogenic Shock: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗前左心室卸载与伴心原性休克的急性心肌梗死患者生存率的改善相关:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2022 Jun;39:28-35. doi: 10.1016/j.carrev.2021.10.012. Epub 2021 Nov 10.
5
Efficacy and safety of Impella 5.0 in cardiogenic shock: an updated systematic review.Impella 5.0用于心源性休克的疗效与安全性:一项更新的系统评价
Future Cardiol. 2022 Mar;18(3):253-264. doi: 10.2217/fca-2021-0046. Epub 2021 Oct 29.
6
Short-term mechanical circulatory support as a bridge to durable left ventricular assist device implantation in refractory cardiogenic shock: a systematic review and meta-analysis.短期机械循环支持作为难治性心源性休克患者持久左心室辅助装置植入的桥梁:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2017 Jul 1;52(1):14-25. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezx088.
7
Predicting Mortality in Patients Hospitalized With Acute Myocardial Infarction: From the National Cardiovascular Data Registry.预测急性心肌梗死住院患者的死亡率:来自国家心血管数据注册库
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2025 Mar;18(3):e011259. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.124.011259. Epub 2025 Jan 13.
8
ECMO and Impella Support Strategies as a Bridge to Surgical Repair of Post-Infarction Ventricular Septal Rupture.体外膜肺氧合(ECMO)和 Impella 支持策略作为心肌梗死后室间隔破裂手术修复的桥接。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2022 Apr 28;58(5):611. doi: 10.3390/medicina58050611.
9
Impella Versus Extracorporeal Membranous Oxygenation (ECMO) for Cardiogenic Shock: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Impella 与体外膜肺氧合(ECMO)治疗心源性休克的比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Curr Probl Cardiol. 2023 Jan;48(1):101427. doi: 10.1016/j.cpcardiol.2022.101427. Epub 2022 Sep 26.
10
Percutaneous short-term active mechanical support devices in cardiogenic shock: a systematic review and collaborative meta-analysis of randomized trials.经皮短期主动机械支持装置在心源性休克中的应用:一项随机试验的系统评价和协作荟萃分析。
Eur Heart J. 2017 Dec 14;38(47):3523-3531. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehx363.

本文引用的文献

1
Clinical Review of Cardiogenic Shock After Acute Myocardial Infarction - Revascularization, Mechanical Circulatory Support, and Beyond.急性心肌梗死后心源性休克的临床综述——血运重建、机械循环支持及其他。
Circ Rep. 2024 Nov 29;7(1):6-14. doi: 10.1253/circrep.CR-24-0141. eCollection 2025 Jan 10.
2
Device-related adverse events and flow capacity of percutaneous ventricular assist devices.经皮心室辅助装置的器械相关不良事件及流量能力
Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care. 2025 Feb 20;14(2):93-103. doi: 10.1093/ehjacc/zuae132.
3
Microaxial Flow Pump Use and Renal Outcomes in Infarct-Related Cardiogenic Shock: A Secondary Analysis of the DanGer Shock Trial.
微轴流泵在梗死相关心源性休克中的应用及肾脏结局:DanGer休克试验的二次分析
Circulation. 2024 Dec 17;150(25):1990-2003. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.124.072370. Epub 2024 Oct 27.
4
Prognostic Value of Cardiovascular Biomarkers in the Population.心血管生物标志物在人群中的预后价值。
JAMA. 2024 Jun 11;331(22):1898-1909. doi: 10.1001/jama.2024.5596.
5
Microaxial Flow Pump or Standard Care in Infarct-Related Cardiogenic Shock.微轴流泵与常规治疗在梗死相关性心源性休克中的比较。
N Engl J Med. 2024 Apr 18;390(15):1382-1393. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2312572. Epub 2024 Apr 7.
6
Intra-aortic balloon pump is associated with the lowest whereas Impella with the highest inpatient mortality and complications regardless of severity or hospital types.主动脉内球囊泵相关的住院病死率和并发症最低,Impella 相关的住院病死率和并发症最高,与严重程度或医院类型无关。
Cardiovasc Interv Ther. 2024 Jul;39(3):252-261. doi: 10.1007/s12928-024-00993-8. Epub 2024 Mar 31.
7
Biomarkers for Risk Stratification in Patients With Type A Acute Aortic Dissection.A型急性主动脉夹层患者的风险分层标志物。
Am J Cardiol. 2024 Feb 1;212:103-108. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2023.11.053. Epub 2023 Nov 30.
8
Early Utilization of Mechanical Circulatory Support in Acute Myocardial Infarction Complicated by Cardiogenic Shock: The National Cardiogenic Shock Initiative.急性心肌梗死并发心源性休克患者机械循环支持的早期应用:国家心源性休克倡议。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2023 Dec 5;12(23):e031401. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.123.031401. Epub 2023 Nov 28.
9
Impella - Current issues and future expectations for the percutaneous, microaxial flow left ventricular assist device.Impella - 经皮微轴流左心室辅助装置的当前问题和未来期望。
J Cardiol. 2024 Apr;83(4):228-235. doi: 10.1016/j.jjcc.2023.10.008. Epub 2023 Nov 4.
10
Complications and Outcomes of Impella Treatment in Cardiogenic Shock Patients With and Without Acute Myocardial Infarction.在伴有和不伴有急性心肌梗死的心源性休克患者中使用 Impella 治疗的并发症和结果。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2023 Sep 5;12(17):e030819. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.123.030819. Epub 2023 Aug 30.