Suppr超能文献

急性缺血性卒中试验中早期国立卫生研究院卒中量表与90天改良Rankin量表结果的比较:一项系统评价与分析

Comparing Early National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale Versus 90-Day Modified Rankin Scale Outcomes in Acute Ischemic Stroke Trials: A Systematic Review and Analysis.

作者信息

Rinkel Leon A, Ospel Johanna M, Kappelhof Manon, Sehgal Arshia, McDonough Rosalie V, Tymianski Michael, Hill Michael D, Goyal Mayank, Ganesh Aravind

机构信息

Calgary Stroke Program, Departments of Clinical Neurosciences and Community Health Sciences, The Hotchkiss Brain Institute and the O'Brien Institute for Public Health University of Calgary Canada.

Department of Neurology, Amsterdam University Medical Centres Location University of Amsterdam the Netherlands.

出版信息

J Am Heart Assoc. 2025 May 6;14(9):e040304. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.124.040304. Epub 2025 Apr 25.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Early National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) assessment may provide practical benefits over 90-day modified Rankin Scale (mRS), but it is unclear how it compares in adjudicating randomized clinical trial (RCT) results in acute ischemic stroke.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We searched Ovid Medline (inception to April 1, 2023) and included RCTs of acute therapies for acute ischemic stroke with data for both 90-day mRS and NIHSS within 7 days. Primary outcome was agreement between trial results (classified as positive, negative, or neutral) based on 24-hour NIHSS and 90-day mRS scores. We additionally assessed agreement for 2-hour, 48-hour, 72- to 96-hour, and 5- to 7-day NIHSS scores. We aimed to validate our findings using individual patient data from the ESCAPE (Randomized Assessment of Rapid Endovascular Treatment of Ischemic Stroke) and ESCAPE-NA1 (Safety and Efficacy of Nerinetide [NA-1] in Subjects Undergoing Endovascular Thrombectomy for Stroke) RCTs. We included 116 trials (44 387 patients), contributing 165 NIHSS assessments. The 24-hour NIHSS scores resulted in the same classification as 90-day mRS scores in 61/73 (83.6%) trials (Cohen's kappa, 0.64 [95% CI: 0.45-0.83] and Gwet's agreement coefficient 1, 0.79 [95% CI: 0.67-0.90]). Agreement was not statistically different by timing of NIHSS assessments (range 75%-100%, =0.33). Individual patient data showed higher agreement for assessments between 48 hours and 7 days, varying by NIHSS dichotomization cutoffs (NIHSS score, 0-2; 2 hours, 56.6%; 24 hours, 66.6%; 48 hours, 71.8%; 5-7 days: 76.5%, <0.01; NIHSS score, 0-7; 2 hours, 72.8%; 24 hours, 80.5%; 48 hours, 83.1%; 5-7 days: 84.7%, <0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

The 24-hour NIHSS scores aligned with 90-day mRS scores in 84% of RCT results, indicating intermediate-to-good agreement. However, individual patient data showed that early NIHSS risks misclassifying around 1/4 patients. These data contribute to a better understanding of the nuances of early NIHSS score as an outcome in acute ischemic stroke RCTs.

摘要

背景

早期美国国立卫生研究院卒中量表(NIHSS)评估可能比90天改良Rankin量表(mRS)具有实际优势,但在判定急性缺血性卒中的随机临床试验(RCT)结果时,两者的比较情况尚不清楚。

方法与结果

我们检索了Ovid Medline(起始至2023年4月1日),纳入急性缺血性卒中急性治疗的随机对照试验,这些试验需提供7天内90天mRS和NIHSS的数据。主要结局是基于24小时NIHSS和90天mRS评分的试验结果(分为阳性、阴性或中性)之间的一致性。我们还评估了2小时、48小时、72至96小时以及5至7天NIHSS评分的一致性。我们旨在使用来自ESCAPE(缺血性卒中快速血管内治疗随机评估)和ESCAPE-NA1(神经保护剂[NA-1]在接受血管内血栓切除术治疗卒中患者中的安全性和有效性)随机对照试验的个体患者数据来验证我们的发现。我们纳入了116项试验(44387例患者),进行了165次NIHSS评估。在61/73(83.6%)的试验中,24小时NIHSS评分与90天mRS评分得出的分类相同(Cohen's kappa系数为0.64[95%CI:0.45 - 0.83],Gwet's一致性系数1为0.79[95%CI:0.67 - 0.90])。NIHSS评估时间不同,一致性无统计学差异(范围75% - 100%,P = 0.33)。个体患者数据显示,48小时至7天评估的一致性更高,因NIHSS二分法临界值而异(NIHSS评分,0 - 2;2小时,56.6%;24小时,66.6%;48小时,71.8%;5 - 7天:76.5%,P < 0.01;NIHSS评分,0 - 7;2小时,72.8%;24小时,80.5%;48小时,83.1%;5 - 7天:84.7%,P < 0.01)。

结论

在84%的随机对照试验结果中,24小时NIHSS评分与90天mRS评分一致,表明一致性为中等至良好。然而,个体患者数据显示,早期NIHSS有大约1/4的患者分类错误风险。这些数据有助于更好地理解早期NIHSS评分作为急性缺血性卒中随机对照试验结局的细微差别。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验