Suppr超能文献

用于严重半球缺血性中风患者的磺脲类药物。

Sulfonylurea drugs for people with severe hemispheric ischemic stroke.

作者信息

Fan Linlin, Xu Jin, Wang Tao, Yang Kun, Bai Xuesong, Yang Wuyang

机构信息

Neurocritical Care Unit, Department of Neurology, Xuanwu Hospital Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.

Education Department, Capital Medical University Xuanwu Hospital, Beijing, China.

出版信息

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Mar 11;3(3):CD014802. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014802.pub2.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Large hemispheric infarction (LHI), caused by occlusion of the internal carotid or middle cerebral artery, is the most malignant type of supratentorial ischemic stroke. Due to severe intracranial edema, mortality fluctuates between 53% and 78%, even after the most effective medical treatment. Decompressive craniectomy can reduce mortality by approximately 17% to 36%, but the neurological outcomes are not satisfactory, and there are contraindications to surgery. Therapeutic hypothermia shows promising effects in preclinical research, but it causes many complications, and clinical studies have not confirmed its efficacy. Glibenclamide is a type of sulfonylurea. Preclinical research shows that glibenclamide can reduce mortality and brain edema and improve neurological outcomes in animal models of ischemic stroke. Sulfonylureas may be a promising treatment for individuals with LHI.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the effects of sulfonylurea drugs in people with large hemispheric ischemic stroke.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, five other databases, and three trials registers. We also searched gray literature sources, checked the bibliographies of included studies and relevant systematic reviews, and used Cited Reference Search in Google Scholar. The latest search date was 23 March 2024.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared sulfonylureas with placebo, hypothermia, or usual care in people with severe hemispheric ischemic stroke.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

We used standard Cochrane methods. Our primary outcomes were neurological and functional outcomes. Our secondary outcomes were death, quality of life, adverse events, and complications. We used GRADE to assess the certainty of the evidence for each outcome.

MAIN RESULTS

This review includes two RCTs (N = 621): the GAMES-RP trial (glyburide advantage in malignant edema and stroke) and the CHARM trial (phase 3 study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of intravenous BIIB093 (glibenclamide) for severe cerebral edema following large hemispheric infarction). Both studies compared the effects of intravenous glyburide (0.13 mg bolus intravenous injection for the first 2 minutes, followed by an infusion of 0.16 mg/h for the first 6 hours and then 0.11 mg/h for the remaining 66 hours) to placebo. The GAMES-RP trial (N = 86) was conducted in 18 hospitals in the USA (mean age: intervention = 58 ± 11 years; control = 63 ± 9 years); the CHARM trial (N = 535) was conducted in 20 countries across North and South America and Eurasia (mean age: intervention = 60.5 ± 11.17 years; control = 61.6 ± 10.81 years). The overall risk of bias was high in both trials. Neither trial reported neurological outcomes. Compared with placebo, glyburide may result in little to no difference in functional outcomes, assessed with the modified Rankin Scale (range 0 to 4) at 90 days (risk ratio (RR) 1.08, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.89 to 1.32; P = 0.43; 2 studies, 508 participants; low-certainty evidence), or death (RR 0.78, 95% CI 0.36 to 1.69; P = 0.53; 2 studies, 595 participants; low-certainty evidence). Glyburide likely results in a large increased risk of hypoglycemia (RR 4.66, 95% CI 1.59 to 13.67; P = 0.005; 2 studies, 601 participants; moderate-certainty evidence) compared to placebo. However, it probably results in little to no difference between groups in cardiac events (RR 0.73, 95% CI 0.47 to 1.14; P = 0.17; 2 studies, 601 participants; moderate-certainty evidence), or pneumonia (RR 0.72, 95% CI 0.36 to 1.44; 1 study, 518 participants; moderate-certainty evidence), and may result in little to no difference between groups in neurological deterioration within three days (RR 0.88, 95% CI 0.61 to 1.27; 1 study, 77 participants; low-certainty evidence).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Compared to placebo, intravenous glyburide may have little to no effect on functional outcomes, assessed with the modified Rankin Scale, or mortality. It may also have little to no effect on neurological deterioration within three days, and probably has little to no effect on cardiac events or pneumonia. However, intravenous glyburide probably results in a large increased risk of hypoglycemia. This review includes only two RCTs at overall high risk of bias. We do not have sufficient evidence to determine the effects of sulfonylureas in people with ischemic stroke. More large studies, which include more sulfonylurea drugs with different routes of administration and dosages, and different age groups with ischemic stroke, would help to reduce the current uncertainties.

摘要

背景

由颈内动脉或大脑中动脉闭塞引起的大脑半球大面积梗死(LHI)是幕上缺血性卒中最严重的类型。由于严重的颅内水肿,即使经过最有效的药物治疗,死亡率仍在53%至78%之间波动。减压性颅骨切除术可使死亡率降低约17%至36%,但神经功能预后并不理想,且手术存在禁忌证。治疗性低温在临床前研究中显示出有前景的效果,但会引发许多并发症,且临床研究尚未证实其疗效。格列本脲是一种磺脲类药物。临床前研究表明,格列本脲可降低缺血性卒中动物模型的死亡率和脑水肿,并改善神经功能预后。磺脲类药物可能是治疗LHI患者的一种有前景的疗法。

目的

评估磺脲类药物对大脑半球大面积缺血性卒中患者的影响。

检索方法

我们检索了Cochrane系统评价数据库、医学期刊数据库、Embase数据库以及其他五个数据库和三个试验注册库。我们还检索了灰色文献来源,查阅了纳入研究和相关系统评价的参考文献,并在谷歌学术中使用了被引参考文献检索。最新检索日期为2024年3月23日。

选择标准

我们纳入了将磺脲类药物与安慰剂、低温或常规治疗相比较的随机对照试验(RCT),试验对象为严重大脑半球缺血性卒中患者。

数据收集与分析

我们采用标准的Cochrane方法。我们的主要结局是神经功能和功能预后。次要结局是死亡、生活质量、不良事件和并发症。我们使用GRADE方法评估每个结局证据的确定性。

主要结果

本综述纳入了两项RCT(N = 621):GAMES-RP试验(格列本脲在恶性水肿和卒中中的优势)和CHARM试验(评估静脉注射BIIB093(格列本脲)治疗大脑半球大面积梗死后严重脑水肿的疗效和安全性的3期研究)。两项研究均比较了静脉注射格列本脲(前2分钟静脉推注0.13 mg,随后前6小时以0.16 mg/h输注,其余66小时以0.11 mg/h输注)与安慰剂的效果。GAMES-RP试验(N = 86)在美国的18家医院进行(平均年龄:干预组 = 58 ± 11岁;对照组 = 63 ± 9岁);CHARM试验(N = 535)在北美、南美和欧亚大陆的20个国家进行(平均年龄:干预组 = 60.5 ± 11.17岁;对照组 = 61.6 ± 10.81岁)。两项试验的总体偏倚风险均较高。两项试验均未报告神经功能结局。与安慰剂相比,在90天时用改良Rankin量表(范围0至4)评估,格列本脲可能在功能预后方面几乎没有差异(风险比(RR)1.08,95%置信区间(CI)0.89至1.32;P = 0.43;2项研究,508名参与者;低确定性证据),或在死亡方面(RR 0.78,95% CI 0.36至1.69;P = 0.53;2项研究,595名参与者;低确定性证据)。与安慰剂相比,格列本脲可能导致低血糖风险大幅增加(RR 4.66,95% CI 1.59至13.67;P = 0.005;2项研究,601名参与者;中等确定性证据)。然而,两组在心脏事件方面可能几乎没有差异(RR 0.73,95% CI 0.47至1.14;P = 0.17;2项研究,601名参与者;中等确定性证据),或在肺炎方面(RR 0.72,95% CI 0.36至1.44;1项研究,518名参与者;中等确定性证据),并且在三天内两组在神经功能恶化方面可能几乎没有差异(RR 0.88,95% CI 0.61至1.27;1项研究,77名参与者;低确定性证据)。

作者结论

与安慰剂相比,静脉注射格列本脲在用改良Rankin量表评估的功能预后或死亡率方面可能几乎没有影响。它在三天内对神经功能恶化可能也几乎没有影响,并且对心脏事件或肺炎可能也几乎没有影响。然而,静脉注射格列本脲可能导致低血糖风险大幅增加。本综述仅包括两项总体偏倚风险较高的RCT。我们没有足够的证据来确定磺脲类药物对缺血性卒中患者的影响。更多的大型研究,包括更多具有不同给药途径和剂量的磺脲类药物,以及不同年龄组的缺血性卒中患者,将有助于减少当前的不确定性。

相似文献

1
Sulfonylurea drugs for people with severe hemispheric ischemic stroke.用于严重半球缺血性中风患者的磺脲类药物。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Mar 11;3(3):CD014802. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014802.pub2.
8
Surgery for spontaneous supratentorial intracerebral haemorrhage.自发性幕上脑出血的手术治疗
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Jul 17;7(7):CD015387. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD015387.pub2.
9
Transcranial laser therapy for acute ischaemic stroke.经颅激光治疗急性缺血性卒中
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Jul 24;7:CD012426. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012426.pub2.
10
Systemic treatments for metastatic cutaneous melanoma.转移性皮肤黑色素瘤的全身治疗
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Feb 6;2(2):CD011123. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011123.pub2.

本文引用的文献

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验