Duc H T, Kinsky R G, Monnot P, Voisin G A
Cell Immunol. 1985 Oct 1;95(1):180-94. doi: 10.1016/0008-8749(85)90306-5.
The kinetics and quality of the alloimmune reaction were studied in CBA (H-2k) mice treated for passive enhancement of tumor allografts (Sa 1 indigenous of A/J (H-2a or H-2k/d) mice). Serum samples of treated animals were tested for their biological properties relevant to different antibody isotypes in vitro (hemagglutination, complement-dependent cytotoxicity, and anaphylaxis, i.e., mast cell degranulation involving all main Ig isotypes; IgM, IgG2, and IgG1, IgE, respectively) as well as in vivo (allograft enhancement). Spleen cells from these treated animals were examined for their capacity to interfere with the rejection of tumor allografts by adoptive transfers into syngeneic recipients. In vitro, 51Cr release cytolysis assays were performed in order to test their cytolytic and regulatory activities in comparison to rejecting control animals. It has been shown that: grafted mice, pretreated for passive enhancement, kept their grafts longer and synthetized anaphylactic antibodies (mainly IgG1) earlier and at higher titers than normal serum controls, which rejected the same Sa 1 allografts. Mice with enhanced tumors synthetized cytotoxic antibodies (mainly IgG2) later than rejecting controls. Serum samples from treated and control animals, harvested 10 days (early sera) and 30 days (late sera) after grafting, were injected with a "normal dose" (0.2 ml) and a "high" dose (0.4 ml) to new CBA recipients grafted with Sa 1. Early immune sera were only enhancing at high doses when derived from animals previously treated for enhancement (at the low dose both immune sera were enhancing). Late sera, presenting both complement-fixing, cytotoxic (predominantly IgG2), and IgG1 anaphylactic alloantibodies in the two groups, induced enhancement in all cases, but more strongly when derived from the group treated for Sa 1 enhancement. Adoptive transfer of spleen cells from animals treated for passive enhancement were able either to inhibit the accelerated rejection (Day 10) or to promote enhancement of Sa 1 allogeneic cells (Day 30) while similar cells taken (Day 10 and Day 30) from control graft-rejecting mice transferred accelerated rejection. Among the transferred T-cell sub-populations, the suppressive effect was mediated by Lyt 2 T cells. In vitro, these spleen cells showed a weaker cytolytic activity than those of allograft-rejecting mice. Moreover, they were able to regulate the cytolytic activity of cytotoxic effector cells from specifically immunized CBA mice.
在接受过肿瘤同种异体移植被动增强治疗(移植来自A/J(H-2a或H-2k/d)小鼠的Sa 1肿瘤)的CBA(H-2k)小鼠中,研究了同种免疫反应的动力学和质量。对治疗动物的血清样本进行体外测试,检测其与不同抗体同种型相关的生物学特性(血凝反应、补体依赖性细胞毒性和过敏反应,即分别涉及所有主要Ig同种型IgM、IgG2、IgG1和IgE的肥大细胞脱颗粒)以及体内测试(同种异体移植增强)。检查这些治疗动物的脾细胞通过过继转移至同基因受体来干扰肿瘤同种异体移植排斥的能力。在体外,进行51Cr释放细胞溶解试验,以便与排斥对照组动物相比,测试其细胞溶解和调节活性。结果表明:接受过被动增强预处理的移植小鼠,其移植瘤保留时间更长,合成过敏抗体(主要是IgG1)的时间更早且效价比正常血清对照组更高,而正常血清对照组会排斥相同的Sa 1同种异体移植瘤。肿瘤增强的小鼠合成细胞毒性抗体(主要是IgG2)的时间比排斥对照组更晚。在移植后10天(早期血清)和30天(晚期血清)采集的治疗组和对照组动物的血清样本,以“正常剂量”(0.2 ml)和“高剂量”(0.4 ml)注射到移植了Sa 1的新CBA受体中。早期免疫血清只有在来自先前接受过增强治疗的动物时,高剂量才具有增强作用(低剂量时两种免疫血清都具有增强作用)。晚期血清在两组中均呈现出补体结合、细胞毒性(主要是IgG2)和IgG1过敏同种抗体,在所有情况下均诱导增强作用,但来自接受Sa 1增强治疗组的血清诱导作用更强。过继转移接受过被动增强治疗动物的脾细胞,要么能够抑制加速排斥(第10天),要么能够促进Sa 1同种异体细胞的增强(第30天),而取自对照移植排斥小鼠(第10天和第30天)的类似细胞则转移加速排斥。在转移的T细胞亚群中,抑制作用由Lyt 2 T细胞介导。在体外,这些脾细胞的细胞溶解活性比同种异体移植排斥小鼠的脾细胞弱。此外,它们能够调节特异性免疫的CBA小鼠的细胞毒性效应细胞的细胞溶解活性。