Miyawaki M, Tsuruda T
Cell Biol Int Rep. 1985 Jun;9(6):555-9. doi: 10.1016/0309-1651(85)90020-7.
It was reported previously that the red chromatophores on the midgut of a freshwater shrimp, Caridina denticulata, are affected by Locke's and van Harreveld's solutions differently, i.e., the pigment disperses in Locke's solution and concentrates with the addition of crude eyestalk extract, but in Harreveld's solution the chromatophores do not change in the saline alone nor do they respond to eyestalk extract. The differences were probably due to the osmotic pressure and Mg ion concentrations of the two solutions not being the same. Harreveld's solution is commonly used as a physiological saline for freshwater crustaceans such as crayfish. Consequently, this solution was employed at first in a previous study (Miyawaki and Tsuruda, 1985). But this solution completely inhibited pigment migration in the chromatophores. But when Locke's solution was subsequently tried, migration of the pigment in the midgut chromatophores occurred. It seemed worthwhile to examine further the effects of both solutions on these chromatophores. The results of this study are presented below.
先前有报道称,一种淡水虾——锯齿米虾中肠上的红色色素细胞受洛克氏溶液和范哈维尔德氏溶液的影响不同,即色素在洛克氏溶液中分散,添加粗眼柄提取物后浓缩,但在哈维尔德氏溶液中,色素细胞在单独的盐溶液中不会发生变化,对眼柄提取物也无反应。这些差异可能是由于两种溶液的渗透压和镁离子浓度不同。哈维尔德氏溶液通常用作淡水甲壳类动物(如小龙虾)的生理盐溶液。因此,在先前的一项研究中(宫胁和鹤田,1985年)最初使用了这种溶液。但这种溶液完全抑制了色素细胞中的色素迁移。但随后尝试使用洛克氏溶液时,中肠色素细胞中的色素发生了迁移。进一步研究这两种溶液对这些色素细胞的影响似乎是值得的。以下是本研究的结果。