Sun Binbin, Pei Shan, Wang Qingjin, Meng Xuelei
School of Business, Qingdao University, Qingdao 266071, China.
Behav Sci (Basel). 2025 Apr 8;15(4):494. doi: 10.3390/bs15040494.
The prevalence of artificial intelligence (AI) increases social concern surrounding unethical consumer behavior in human-AI interaction. Existing research has mainly focused on anthropomorphic characteristics of AI and unethical consumer behavior (UCB). However, the role of algorithms in unethical consumer behavior, which is central to AI, is not yet fully understood. Drawing on social exchange theory, this study investigates the impact of algorithmic discrimination on UCB and explores the interrelationships and underlying mechanisms. Through three experiments, this study found that experiencing algorithmic discrimination significantly increases UCB, with anticipatory guilt mediating this relationship. Moreover, consumers' negative reciprocity beliefs moderated the effects of algorithmic discrimination on anticipatory guilt and UCB. In addition, this study distinguish between active and passive UCB based on their underlying ethical motivations. This enhances the study's universality by assessing both types of behaviors and highlighting their differences. These insights extend current research on UCB within the purview of AI agents and provide valuable insights into effectively mitigating losses caused by UCB behaviors, offering improved directions for facilitating AI agents to provide fair, reliable, and efficient interactions for both businesses and consumers.
人工智能(AI)的普及引发了社会对人机交互中不道德消费行为的关注。现有研究主要集中在人工智能的拟人化特征和不道德消费行为(UCB)上。然而,算法在不道德消费行为中的作用,这是人工智能的核心,尚未得到充分理解。本研究借鉴社会交换理论,调查算法歧视对不道德消费行为的影响,并探讨其间的相互关系和潜在机制。通过三个实验,本研究发现,经历算法歧视会显著增加不道德消费行为,预期内疚在这一关系中起中介作用。此外,消费者的消极互惠信念调节了算法歧视对预期内疚和不道德消费行为的影响。此外,本研究根据不道德消费行为的潜在道德动机,区分了主动和被动不道德消费行为。通过评估这两种行为类型并突出它们的差异,增强了研究的普遍性。这些见解扩展了当前在人工智能代理范围内对不道德消费行为的研究,并为有效减轻不道德消费行为造成的损失提供了有价值的见解,为促进人工智能代理为企业和消费者提供公平、可靠和高效的交互提供了改进方向。