Jelisejevas Lukas Andrius, Rehder Peter, Wassermann Jannik, Kink Patricia, Tulchiner Gennadi
Department of Urology, Medical University Innsbruck, 6020 Innsbruck, Tyrol, Austria.
Department of Urology, Tauernklinikum Zell am See, 6700 Zell am See, Salzburg, Austria.
Medicina (Kaunas). 2025 Apr 11;61(4):700. doi: 10.3390/medicina61040700.
: We aimed to assess the outcomes of upfront Optilume drug-coated balloon (DCB) dilation in patients after failed treatment for complex recurrent urethral stricture disease. All patients presented with acute urinary retention and were treated with DCB dilation regardless of stricture site and length. : We retrospectively evaluated patients with acute urinary retention and known complex recurrent urethral strictures. Patients presented at the urology emergency room of our tertiary centre with an inability to void or a post-void residual (PVR) volume exceeding 400 mL between August 2021 and February 2024. Urethrography and/or endoscopic imaging confirmed the diagnosis. Patients with urinary tract infection/sepsis and those with neurological disease were excluded. Urethral dilation to 20 Fr was performed, followed by DCB dilation (30 Fr, 10 bar, 10 min). The primary endpoints were anatomical success (≥14 Fr by cystoscopy/calibration) at 12 months and freedom from repeat interventions. : Thirty-one consecutive male patients were evaluated, with twenty-six patients followed for ≥12 months (mean age 65 ± 16.8 years). The stricture sites included seven bulbopenile, seven bulbomembranous, seven anastomotic, three bladder neck, one penile, and one panurethral stricture. The median number of prior urethral/surgical interventions was 2 [IQR: 1-3] (range: 1-31). The median stricture length was 3 [IQR: 2-4] cm (range: 1-8). At 12 months, 65.4% (17/26) of subjects voided satisfactorily and were free of recurrence and reoperation. : Timely DCB dilation may offer a viable treatment option for patients with complex recurrent urethral strictures and urinary retention, particularly those who are unable or unwilling to undergo surgical reconstruction and prefer to avoid indwelling catheters.
我们旨在评估在复杂性复发性尿道狭窄疾病治疗失败后,采用Optilume药物涂层球囊(DCB)进行初始扩张的疗效。所有患者均表现为急性尿潴留,且不论狭窄部位和长度,均接受DCB扩张治疗。我们回顾性评估了患有急性尿潴留且已知患有复杂性复发性尿道狭窄的患者。2021年8月至2024年2月期间,患者因无法排尿或排尿后残余尿量(PVR)超过400 mL就诊于我们三级中心的泌尿外科急诊室。尿道造影和/或内镜成像确诊病情。排除患有尿路感染/脓毒症以及患有神经系统疾病的患者。先将尿道扩张至20 Fr,随后进行DCB扩张(30 Fr,10 bar,10分钟)。主要终点为12个月时的解剖学成功(膀胱镜检查/校准显示≥14 Fr)以及无需再次干预。连续评估了31例男性患者,其中26例患者随访时间≥12个月(平均年龄65±16.8岁)。狭窄部位包括7例球海绵体部、7例球膜部、7例吻合口部、3例膀胱颈部、1例阴茎部和1例全尿道狭窄。既往尿道/手术干预的中位数为2次[四分位间距:1 - 3](范围:1 - 31)。狭窄长度的中位数为3 cm[四分位间距:2 - 4](范围:1 - 8)。12个月时,65.4%(17/26)的受试者排尿情况良好,无复发且无需再次手术。及时进行DCB扩张可能为患有复杂性复发性尿道狭窄和尿潴留的患者提供一种可行的治疗选择,尤其是那些无法或不愿接受手术重建且希望避免留置导尿管的患者。